Why increasing predictability cannot do the job alone when we aim to establish trust in the agri-food sector

Franck L.B. Meijboom

Why increasing predictability cannot do the job alone when we aim to establish trust in the agri-food sector

In: Ethics and the politics of food

Author:

Franck L.B. Meijboom

Franck L.B. Meijboom Ethiek Instituut, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, f.l.b.meijboom@ethics.uu.nl

Search for other papers by Franck L.B. Meijboom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

Type:: Chapter

Pages:: 167–171

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086865758_028

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€42.00€35.00 excl. VAT

Add to Cart

Redeem Access Token

In spite of all attention to the safety and quality of food, public trust in food is still subject to discussion. A common way to address the public hesitance to trust the parties within the food sector is a strong focus on increasing predictability. This mainly results in measures that aim to increase transparency and provide information. The argument that underlies this focus is that the real problem of trust is a lack of predictability and a need for possibilities of a trustor to anticipate on what will happen when one trusts. Without denying the relevance of explicating routines and patterns in the sector, I argue in this paper that predictability is not a sufficient condition if the aim is to build public trust in the agri-food sector. For this claim I present three arguments. First, the current food sector faces us with the problem that patterns and routines are not simply elements that are present and only have to be revealed with the help of sufficient information. This has implications for the scope of transparency, which is elaborated in my second argument. Transparency cannot be restricted to mere openness. It has to include more fundamental assumptions that underlie actions and policy. Finally, trustful expectations are not only based upon predictable patterns, but also on anthropological or moral assumptions. These assumptions enable us to trust even when predictable patterns fail or are conflicting with each other. Hence they are an essential addition to the emphasis on trust and predictability.

Citation Info

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share link with colleague or librarian

You can email a link to this page to a colleague or librarian:
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789086865758/BP000028.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

Collapse
Expand

Ethics and the politics of food

Preprints of the 6th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics

E-Book ISBN:: 9789086865758

Publisher:: Wageningen Academic

Print Publication Date:: 10 Oct 2006

Subjects
- Life Sciences

Metrics

	All Time	Past 365 days	Past 30 Days
Abstract Views	88	23	7
Full Text Views	1	0	0
PDF Views & Downloads	2	0	0

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

Authors

Open Access

Product Information

Company

Contact

Why increasing predictability cannot do the job alone when we aim to establish trust in the agri-food sector

Citation Info

Share link with colleague or librarian

Ethics and the politics of food

Preprints of the 6th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics

Table of Contents

Metrics

Metrics