Biotechnology, disagreement and the limitations of public debate

Bernice Bovenkerk

Biotechnology, disagreement and the limitations of public debate

于Ethics and the politics of food

著者：

Bernice Bovenkerk

Bernice Bovenkerk University of Melbourne, Currently linked to the Ethics Institute, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands, bernicebovenkerk@yahoo.com.au

Search for other papers by Bernice Bovenkerk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

类型:: 章节

Page Range:: 95–102

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086865758_015

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€42.00€35.00 excl. VAT

Add to Cart

找回访问令牌

In discussions about the merits of biotechnology we are faced with a diversity of opinions and attitudes, giving rise to persistent disagreements. I distinguish six different sources of disagreement, which correspond to different levels of ‘fundamentality’; the more basic the values and worldviews that specific arguments appeal to, the more fundamental the disagreement is, and the more likely it is to become intractable. This could be one reason why the biotechnology debate tends to revolve around more pragmatic issues, such as the safety of GMOs and the need for labelling, while other issues, especially those of a more metaphysical nature, remain in the background. Appeals to more fundamental concerns are often left out of public debate, because it is argued that in a pluralistic society we will never be able to reach agreement on these. However, I want to argue that limiting public debate about biotechnology to less fundamental levels of disagreement, does injustice to the biotechnology controversy, because it misrepresents the actual way in which participants in the debate reach their positions on biotechnology. To a certain extent all the different categories of disagreement are based on moral viewpoints − as they all have evaluative aspects − and on a deeper level they can be traced to specific worldviews and metaphysical views. We would be abstracting from the wider reasons that move people, if we limited the debate to less fundamental issues. More importantly, framing the biotechnology debate solely in less fundamental or pragmatic terms is inherently biased, because it tends to favour pro-biotechnology standpoints.

引用信息

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share Link

Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789086865758/BP000015.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

折叠
展开
回到页面顶端

Ethics and the politics of food

Preprints of the 6th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics

ISBN:: 9789086865758

出版社:: Wageningen Academic

印刷出版日期:: 10 Oct 2006

Subjects
- Life Sciences

统计数据

	全部期间	过去一年	过去30天
摘要浏览次数	136	45	6
全文浏览次数	3	0	0
PDF下载次数	3	0	0

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

AppBar-Authors 2025

AppBar-Open Access 2025

AppBar-Product Information 2025

AppBar-Company 2025

AppBar-Contact 2025

Biotechnology, disagreement and the limitations of public debate

引用信息

Share Link

Ethics and the politics of food

Preprints of the 6th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics

目录

统计数据

统计数据