Can killing be justified: a dismissal of the replaceability argument

T. Visak

Can killing be justified: a dismissal of the replaceability argument

in Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons

Autor:in:

T. Visak

T. Visak Ethics Institute, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80103, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands; T.Visak@uu.nl

Search for other papers by T. Visak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

Art:: Kapitel

Seiten:: 165–169

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086866731_027

Über Institut einloggen

Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):

42,00 €35,00 € excl. VAT

Add to Cart

Token einlösen

I evaluate a utilitarian argument that justifies killing animals: the Replaceability Argument. According to utilitarianism, killing an animal, which would otherwise have continued to live a pleasant life, amounts to a welfare loss. The idea of the Replaceability Argument is that bringing another animal into existence, which is at least as happy as the killed animal, can compensate for the welfare loss. The Replaceability argument depends on the view that the possible welfare of possible individuals, such as the possible second animal, counts. This is the Total View. An alternative view is the Prior Existence View, which accepts as moral objects only individuals who already exist or who will definitely exist. Those whose existence depends on the moral choice in question do not count. So, the Prior Existence View would not take into account the possible welfare of the possible second animal while considering whether killing the first animal is acceptable. This is because the second animal does not exist and its existence depends on the moral choice that is contemplated, i.e. whether to kill the first animal. The Prior Existence View is initially attractive. It does not accept the creation of happy beings as a way of maximizing welfare that counts on a par with making existing beings more happy. The fact that a possible being would be happy is no reason for bringing it into existence. Though initially attractive, a powerful argument has been brought forward against the Prior Existence View. It has been argued that the Prior Existence View cannot accept the expected misery of a possible individual as a reason against bringing this being into existence. This problem for the Prior Existence View has famously been brought forward in the Case of the Wretched Child (Parfit, 1984). I argue, however, that the Prior Existence View can deal in an intuitively plausible way with the Case of the Wretched Child. The Case of the Wretched Child does not dismiss the Prior Existence View. The Prior Existence View has not been dismissed as a plausible view within utilitarianism. The Prior Existence View does not support the Replaceability Argument. Utilitarianism therefore might offer animals a stronger protection against killing than both utilitarians and their critics deemed possible.

Zitierungsangaben

Save
Cite
Inhalt per Mail versenden

Link teilen

Sie können einen Link zu dieser Seite per E-Mail senden:
Inhalt per Mail versenden
oder den Link direkt kopieren:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789086866731/BP000027.xml
Der Link wurde nicht kopiert. Ihr aktueller Browser unterstützt das Kopieren über diese Schaltfläche möglicherweise nicht.

Link wurde kopiert

Reduzieren
Erweitern
Nach oben

Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons

ISBN:: 9789086866731

Verleger:: Wageningen Academic

Print-Publikationsdatum:: 30 Oct 2009

Fachgebiete
- Biowissenschaften

Kennzahlen

	Insgesamt	Letzte 365 Tage	In den letzten 30 Tagen
Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen	97	38	6
Gesamttextansichten	0	0	0
PDF-Downloads	4	1	0

Afrikanistik	Internationale Beziehungen	Nahost- und Islamwissenschaften
Altorientalistik und Ägyptologie	Internationales Recht	Pädagogik
Amerikanistik	Judaistik	Philosophie
Asienwissenschaften	Klassische Altertumswissenschaft	Religionswissenschaft
Bibelauslegung	Kunstgeschichte	Slawistik und Eurasienkunde
Biologie	Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaften	Sozialwissenschaften
Biowissenschaften	Medienwissenschaft	Sprachen und Linguistik
Buchgeschichte und Kartographie	Menschenrechte und humanitäres Völkerrecht	Theologie und Christentum
Geschichte	Musikwissenschaft

Fachgebiete

Autor:innen

Open Access

Produkt-Informationen

Über uns

Kontakt

Can killing be justified: a dismissal of the replaceability argument

Zitierungsangaben

Link teilen

Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Kennzahlen

Kennzahlen