Keeping warm in an ethical way â is it acceptable to use food crops as fuel?

C. Gamborg; K.H. Madsen; P. SandÃ¸e

Keeping warm in an ethical way â is it acceptable to use food crops as fuel?

In: Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons

Authors:

C. Gamborg

C. Gamborg ¹University of Copenhagen, Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark; chg@life.ku.dk

Search for other papers by C. Gamborg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

K.H. Madsen

K.H. Madsen ²AgroTech, Institute for Agri Technology and Food Innovation, UdkÃ¦rsvej 15, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark

Search for other papers by K.H. Madsen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

, and

P. SandÃ¸e

P. SandÃ¸e ¹University of Copenhagen, Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark; chg@life.ku.dk

Search for other papers by P. SandÃ¸e in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

Type:: Chapter

Pages:: 106â110

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086866731_017

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

â¬42.00â¬35.00Â excl. VAT

Add to Cart

Redeem Access Token

Since 1990 crop based products which may be used as food are not allowed in the Danish heating supply system â for âethicalâ reasons. This ethically founded resistance seems to flourish in other parts of the world as well: you cannot burn food when there is hunger in the world. At the same time, setting agricultural land aside or growing non-food crops on a minor part of the fields has been seen by many as a fairly uncontroversial solution to periodical surplus production of food within the European Union (EU). This is despite the fact that the net result is the same: less food is produced, i.e. a smaller part of the production area is used for producing crops for food. The main issue to be addressed in this paper is to understand what lies behind this difference in acceptance. In the paper the background and arguments used in the debate are described and discussed to see whether ethically relevant differences between the two ways of reducing surplus agricultural production can be discerned. The paper argues that one obvious way of explaining the difference is by means of the so-called act- and omission-doctrine found in discussions on medical ethics.

Citation Info

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share link with colleague or librarian

You can email a link to this page to a colleague or librarian:
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789086866731/BP000017.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

Collapse
Expand

Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons

E-Book ISBN:: 9789086866731

Publisher:: Wageningen Academic

Print Publication Date:: 30 Oct 2009

Subjects
- Life Sciences

Metrics

	All Time	Past 365 days	Past 30 Days
Abstract Views	102	25	7
Full Text Views	2	0	0
PDF Views & Downloads	1	1	0

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

Authors

Open Access

Product Information

Company

Contact

Keeping warm in an ethical way â is it acceptable to use food crops as fuel?

Citation Info

Share link with colleague or librarian

Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons

Table of Contents

Metrics

Metrics

Keeping warm in an ethical way â is it acceptable to use food crops as fuel?