Chapter 3 Whatâs in a Rule? A Cross-Slavic Survey of Anankastic Modals
In: The Slavic VerbSearch for other papers by Marco Biasio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
In this chapter, a more fine-grained distinction within the domain of Slavic universal necessity modals is advocated for between âtrueâ deontics and anankastics, i.e., operators expressing ânon-epistemic,â participant-external, ânon-deonticâ necessity (van der Auwera and Plungian 1998). Although anankastic modals have been extensively treated in formal semantics approaches, which have mainly dealt with a set of conditional constructions apparently impervious to a compositional derivation, they have rarely been studied from a comparative perspective. On the basis of a mixed sample of corpus and questionnaire data from Russian, Serbo-Croatian, and Czech, a number of formal diagnostics designed to capture the distributional properties of anankastic modals are put to the test and aligned with the structural characteristics of Slavic modal systems.
van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. âModalityâs Semantic Map.â Linguistic Typology 2(1): 79â124. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79.
BatistiÄ, Tatjana. 1983. âO nekim pitanjima u vezi sa analizom glagola morati i moÄi.â Južnoslovenski filolog XXXIX: 99â111.
van Berkel, Kees, Dov Gabbay, and Leendert van der Torre. 2021. âIf You Want to Smoke, Donât Buy Cigarettes: Near-Anankastics, Contexts, and Hyper Modality.â In Deontic Logic and Normative Systems: 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021, edited by Fenrong Liu, Alessandra Marra, Paul Portner, and Frederik Van De Putte, 36â55. London: College Publications.
Bernasconi, Beatrice. 2022. âChoice of Aspect in a Russian Modal Construction: The Case of prixoditâsja/prijtisâ + infinitive.â Poljarnyj Vestnik: Norwegian Journal of Slavic Studies 25 (2): 1â20. https://doi.org/10.7557/6.6340.
Besters-Dilger, Juliane, Ana DrobnjakoviÄ, and Björn Hansen. 2009. âModals in the Slavonic Languages.â In Modals in the Languages of Europe: A Reference Work, edited by Björn Hansen and Ferdinand de Haan, 167â197. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219210.2.167.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cejtlin, Stella N. 1990. âNeobxodimostâ.â In Teorija funkcionalânoj grammatiki. Temporalânostâ. Modalânostâ, edited by Aleksandr V. Bondarko, 142â156. Leningrad: Nauka.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Condoravdi, Cleo. 2002. âTemporal Interpretation of Modals: Modals for the Present and for the Past.â In The Construction of Meaning, edited by David I. Beaver, Luis D. Casillas MartÃnez, Brady Z. Clark, and Stefan Kaufmann, 59â88. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Condoravdi, Cleo, and Sven Lauer. 2016. âAnankastic Conditionals Are Just Conditionals.â Semantics and Pragmatics 9 (8): 1â69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.9.8.
Condoravdi, Cleo, and Itamar Francez. 2022. âA Minimally Sufficient Analysis of Sufficiency Modal Constructions.â In Proceedings of the 23rd Amsterdam Colloquium, edited by Marco Degano, Tom Roberts, Giorgio Sbardolini, and Marieke Schouwstra, 77â83. Amsterdam: ILLC. https://www.dropbox.com/s/qv9qzppggxz23er/Proceedings2022-pages-84-90.pdf?dl=0 (last access: September 27th, 2024).
Conte, Maria-Elizabeth. 1995. âEpistemico, deontico, anankastico.â In From Pragmatics to Syntax: Modality in Second Language Acquisition, edited by Anna Ramat Giacalone and Grazia Crocco Galèas, 3â10. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Copley, Bridget. 2010. âTowards a Teleological Model for Modals.â Paper presented at Paris Working Sessions on Modality, Goals, and Events (23â24 November 2010). Retrieved from http://bcopley.com/wp-content/uploads/copley.teleological.modals.2010.talk_.pdf (Last access: September 27th, 2024).
Croft, William. 2022. âOn Two Mathematical Representations for âSemantic Mapsâ.â Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41 (1): 67â87. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2021-2040.
De Wit, Astrid, and Stephen M. Dickey. 2024. âAn Epistemic Approach to Aspectual Systems: English, Russian and Beyond.â In Beyond Aspectual Semantics: Explorations in the Pragmatic and Cognitive Realms of Aspect, edited by Astrid De Wit, Frank Brisard, Carol Madden-Lombardi, Michael Meeuwis, and Adeline Patard, 89â116. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192849311.003.0005.
Dickey, Stephen M. 2018. âThoughts on the âTypology of Slavic Aspectâ.â Russian Linguistics 42 (1): 69â103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-017-9189-x.
Divjak, Dagmar. 2009. âMapping between Domains: The Aspect-Modality Interaction in Russian.â Russian Linguistics 33 (3): 249â269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-009-9045-8.
Dunaway, Billy, and Alex Silk. 2014. âWhither Anankastics?â Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1): 75â94. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12041.
Fernando, Tim. 2005. âComic Relief for Anankastic Conditionals.â In Proceedings of the 15th Amsterdam Colloquium, edited by Paul Dekker and Michael Franke, 71â76. Amsterdam: ILLC.
von Fintel, Kai, and Sabine Iatridou. 2007. âAnatomy of a Modal Construction.â Linguistic Inquiry 38 (3): 445â483. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.445.
Franke, Michael. 2006. âTeleological Necessity and Only.â In Proceedings of the Eleventh ESSLLI Student Session, edited by Janneke Huitink and Sophia Katrenko, 14â26. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga.
Gerasimova, Irina A. 2000. âDeontiÄeskaja logika i kognitivnye ustanovki.â In LogiÄeskij analiz jazyka: Jazyki Ätiki, edited by Nina D. Arutjunova, Tatâjana E. Janko, and Nadežda K. Rjabceva, 7â16. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kulâtury.
Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Eleni Staraki. 2013. âAbility, Action and Causation: From Pure Ability to Force.â In Genericity, edited by Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade, and Fabio Del Prete, 250â275. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691807.003.0009.
Goncharov, Julie. 2020. âWhom to Oblige?â In Advances in Formal Slavic Linguistics 2017, edited by Franc MaruÅ¡iÄ, Petra MiÅ¡maÅ¡, and Rok Žaucer, 51â73. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3764847.
Grano, Thomas. 2017. âThe Logic of Intention Reports.â Journal of Semantics 34 (4): 587â632. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffx010.
Grillborzer, Christine. 2019. Sintaksis konstrukcij s pervym dativnym aktantom v russkom jazyke: Sinxronnyj i diaxronnyj analiz. Berlin: Peter Lang.
GvozdanoviÄ, Jadranka. 2021. ââHaveâ + Infinitive in Czech: A Long Multilingual History.â In Selected Proceedings of the 14th Meeting of the Slavic Linguistics Society: In Honor of Peter Kosta, edited by Steven L. Franks, Alan H. Timberlake, and Anna W. Wietecka, 77â88. Berlin: Peter Lang.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1997. The Interaction of Modality and Negation: A Typological Study. New York: Garland.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 2002. âStrong Modality and Negation in Russian.â In Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, edited by Randi Reppen, Susan Fitzmaurice, and Douglas Biber, 91â110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.9.07haa.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 2005. âModality in Slavic and Semantic Maps.â In Modality in Slavonic Languages: New Perspectives, edited by Björn Hansen and Petr Karlik, 3â24. München: Otto Sagner.
Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. âAspects of Modality.â PhD diss., University of California.
Hacquard, Valentine. 2009. âOn the Interaction of Aspect and Modal Auxiliaries.â Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (3): 279â315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9061-6.
Hansen, Björn. 2001. Das Modalauxiliar im Slavischen: Grammatikalisierung und Semantik im Russischen, Polnischen, Serbischen/Kroatischen und Altkirchenslavischen. München: Otto Sagner. https://doi.org/10.5283/epub.11226.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. âComparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies.â Language 86 (3): 663â687. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021.
Homer, Vincent. 2021. âActualistic Interpretations in French.â Semantics and Pragmatics 14 (12): 1â50. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.14.12.
Honselaar, Wim. 1992. âThe Russian Modals пÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¾Ð´Ð¸ÑÑÑÑ/пÑийÑиÑÑ, нÑжно and надо: Semantics and Pragmatics.â In Studies in Russian Linguistics, edited by Adriaan A. Barentsen, B.M. Groen, and R. Sprenger, 125â149. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Huitink, Janneke. 2005. âAnalyzing Anankastic Conditionals and Sufficiency Modals.â In Proceedings of ConSOLE XIII (2004, Tromsø), edited by Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente, and Erik Schoorlemmer, 135â156. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.
Huitink, Janneke. 2008. âModals, Conditionals and Compositionality.â PhD diss., Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
Iatridou, Sabine, and Hedde Zeijlstra. 2013. âNegation, Polarity, and Deontic Modals.â Linguistic Inquiry 44 (4): 529â568. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00138.
JeretiÄ, Paloma. 2021. âNeg-Raising Modals and Scaleless Implicatures.â PhD diss., New York University.
JÄdrzejowski, Åukasz. 2015. âOn Tensed Modals in Polish.â In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The First Berkeley Meeting, edited by MaÅgorzata Szajbel-Keck, Roslyn Burns, and Darya Kavitskaya, 122â142. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Kalogjera, Damir. 1991. âOn the Form and Meaning of the Serbo-Croatian Modal morati.â In Languages in Contact and Contrast: Essays in Contact Linguistics, edited by Vladimir Ivir and Damir Kalogjera, 261â270. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869118.261.
Kagan, Olga A. 2020. âA Force-Dynamic Approach to Perfectivity.â In Vzaimodejstvie aspekta so smežnymi kategorijami: Materialy VII Meždunarodnoj konferencii Komissii po aspektologii Meždunarodnogo komiteta slavistov (Sankt-Peterburg, 5â8 maja 2020 goda), edited by Evgenij V. Golovko, Elena V. Gorbova, Petr A. KoÄarov, Viktor S. Xrakovskij, and Oksana Ju. Äujkova, 149â155. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelâstvo RPGU im. A.I. Gercena.
Kaufmann, Magdalena, and Sanae Tamura. 2020. âPossibility and Necessity in Japanese: Prioritizing, Epistemic, and Dynamic Modality.â In Handbook of Japanese Semantics and Pragmatics, edited by Wesley M. Jacobsen and Yukinori Takubo, 537â585. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512073-011.
Kislov, Aleksej G. 2013. âDinamiÄeskij podxod k deontiÄeskoj logike: Semantika normativnyx operatorov.â NauÄnyj ežegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Uralâskogo otdelenija Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk 13 (3): 20â37.
Klikovac, DuÅ¡ka. 2011. âJoÅ¡ jednom o glagolu trebati: Teorija, upotreba i norma.â NaÅ¡ jezik, XLII (3â4): 3â23.
Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota. 2022. âVariation in Aspect Usage in General-Factual Contexts: New Quantitative Data from Polish, Czech, and Russian.â Languages 7 (2), 146 (Special issue: Tense and Aspect across Languages), 1â35. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020146.
Knobe, Joshua, and Zoltán Gendler Szabó. 2013. âModals with a Taste of the Deontic.â Semantics and Pragmatics 6 (1): 1â42. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.1.
Knyazev, Mikhail. 2020. ââNeedâ with Accusative in Russian.â Scando-Slavica 66 (1): 3â22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00806765.2020.1740107.
KovaÄeviÄ, PeÄa, and Tanja MiliÄev. 2018. âThe Nature(s) of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from the Serbian/Croatian Dialect Continuum.â In Advances in Formal Slavic Linguistics 2016, edited by Denisa Lenertová, Roland Meyer, Radek Å imÃk, and Luka Szucsich, 147â167. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2545519.
Krasikova, Sveta. 2010. âSufficiency Inference in Anankastic Conditionals.â In Proceedings of SALT 20, edited by Nan Li and David Lutz, 91â108. Ithaca: Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v20i0.2576.
Krasikova, Sveta, and Ventsislav Zhechev. 2006. âYou Only Need a Scalar Only.â In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10 (1), edited by Christian Ebert and Cornelia Endriss, 199â210. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2006.v10i1.684.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and Conditionals: New and Revised Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lauer, Sven, and Cleo Condoravdi. 2014. âPreference-Conditioned Necessities: Detachment and Practical Reasoning.â Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (4) (Special issue: Deontic Modality, Guest Editors: Stephen Finlay and Mark Schroeder), 584â621. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12049.
Mari, Alda. 2016. âActuality Entailments: When the Modality is in the Presupposition.â In Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics: Celebrating 20 Years of LACL (1996â2016). 9th International Conference, LACL 2016 (Nancy, France, December 5â7, 2016), Proceedings, edited by Maxime Amblard, Philippe de Groote, Sylvain Pogodalla, and Christian Retoré, 191â210. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53826-5_12.
Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica. 2022. âBelarusian Modals of Necessity: A Corpus-Based Analysis.â Studi Slavistici 19 (2): 231â245. https://doi.org/10.36253/Studi_Slavis-13831.
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2019. âA New Approach on the Modal KE å¯ and the Relation Between the Aspectual and the Modal System in Archaic Chinese.â In New Perspectives on Aspect and Modality in Chinese Historical Linguistics, edited by Barbara Meisterernst, 159â189. Singapore: Springer Singapore; Beijing: Peking University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1948-8_7.
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2020. âA New Approach to the Development of Deontic Markers: In Pre-Modern Chinese.â In A Typological Approach to Grammaticalization and Lexicalization: East Meets West, edited by Janet Zhiqun Xing, 191â230. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110641288-008.
Moltmann, Friederike. 2020. âTruthmaker Semantics for Natural Language: Attitude Verbs, Modals, and Intensional Transitive Verbs.â Theoretical Linguistics 46 (3â4) (Special issue: Truthmaker Semantics for Natural Language: Attitude Verbs, Modals, and Intensional Transitive Verbs), 159â200. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2020-0010.
Nadathur, Prerna. 2020. âCausality and Aspect in Ability, Actuality, and Implicativity.â In Proceedings of SALT 30, edited by Joseph Rhyne, Kaelyn Lamp, Nicole Dreier, and Chloe Kwon, 409â429. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Nadathur, Prerna, and Hana Filip. 2021. âTelicity, Teleological Modality, and (Nonâ)Culmination.â Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 2021. Retrieved from https://pnadathur.github.io/pdfs/Nadathur-Filip.WCCFL2021.pdf (last access: September 27th, 2024).
Nauze, Fabrice D. 2008. âModality in Typological Perspective.â PhD diss., Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Nissenbaum, Jon. 2005. âKissing Pedro Martinez: (Existential) Anankastic Conditionals and Rationale Clauses.â In Proceedings of SALT 15, edited by Efthymia Georgala and Jonathan Howell, 134â151. Ithaca: Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v15i0.3093.
Oshima, David Y. 2019. âOn Supererogation: One Should Not Go When Going Is Good Enough and Not Going Is Not.â In Proceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium, edited by Julian J. Schlöder, Dean McHugh, and Floris Roelofsen, 319â326. Amsterdam: ILLC. https://archive.illc.uva.nl/AC/AC2019/uploaded_files/inlineitem/Oshima_On_supererogation_one_should_go_when_going_i.pdf (last access: September 27th, 2024).
Palmer, Frank R. 22001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phillips-Brown, Milo. 2019. âWhat It Means to Want.â PhD diss., Massachussets Institute of Technology.
Plungjan, Vladimir A. 22003. ObÅ¡Äaja morfologija: Vvedenie v problematiku. Moskva: URSS.
Polinsky, Maria. 2013. âRaising and Control.â In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, Part IVâSyntactic Processes: Their Nature, Locality, and Motivation, edited by Marcel den Dikken, 577â606. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Privoznov, Dmitry. 2019. âTelic Modality in Russian and Beyond.â Ms. 12112 words.
Rubinstein, Aynat. 2012. âRoots of Modality.â PhD diss., University of Massachussets Amherst.
Rubinstein, Aynat. 2013. âFiguring Out What We Ought To Do: The Challenge of Delineating Priorities.â University of Pennsylvania Working Paper in Linguistics 19 (1), 20 (Proceedings of the 36th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium), 169â178.
Sæbø, Kjell J. 2001. âNecessary Conditions in Natural Language.â In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, edited by Caroline Féry and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 427â449. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050080116.427.
Sæbø, Kjell J. 2020. âAnankastic Conditionals: If you want to go to Harlem, â¦â In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, edited by Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann, and Thomas Ede Zimmermann. 27 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118788516.sem107.
Silk, Alex. 2016. âUpdate Semantics for Weak Necessity Modals.â In Deontic Logic and Normative Systems: 13th International Conference, DEON 2016 (Bayreuth, Germany, July 18â21, 2016), edited by Olivier Roy, Allard Tamminga, and Malte Willer, 237â255. London: College Publications.
Silk, Alex. 2022. âWeak and Strong Necessity Modals: On Linguistic Means of Expressing âA Primitive Concept OUGHTâ.â In Meaning, Decision, and Norms: Themes from the Work of Allan Gibbard, edited by Billy Dunaway and David Plunkett, 203â245. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing Services.
SimonoviÄ, Marko, and Boban ArsenijeviÄ. 2014. âLiÄnost i bezliÄnost srpskog glagola trebati. Avanture teorijske lingvistike u prenormiranom domenu.â In Jezik, književnost, marginalizacija, edited by Vesna LopiÄiÄ and Biljana MiÅ¡iÄ-IliÄ, 287â304. NiÅ¡: Univerzitet u NiÅ¡u.
Sparvoli, Carlotta. 2012. âDeontico e anankastico: Proposta di ampliamento della tassonomia modale basata sullâanalisi dei tratti distintivi dei modali cinesi inerenti dovere e necessità .â PhD diss., Università Caâ Foscari Venezia.
Sparvoli, Carlotta. 2020. âThe Factuality Status of Chinese Necessity Modals: Exploring the Distribution Via Corpus-Based Approach.â In Corpus-Based Research on Chinese Language and Linguistics, edited by Bianca Basciano, Franco Gatti, and Anna Morbiato, 145â182. Venezia: Edizioni Caâ Foscari. https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-406-6/005.
VeselinoviÄ, Dunja. 2019. âThe Syntax and Acquisition of Modal Verb Flavors.â PhD diss., New York University.
von Stechow, Arnim, Sveta Krasikova, and Doris Penka. 2006. âAnankastic Conditionals Again.â In A Festschrift for Kjell Johan Sæbø, edited by Torgrim Solstad, Atle Grønn, and Dag Haug, 151â171. Oslo: Unipub.
Werner, Tom. 2006. âAn Analysis of Existential Anankastics: How to Get There from Here.â In Proceedings of SALT 16, edited by Masayuki Gibson and Jonathan Howell, 313â328. Ithaca: Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v16i0.2954.
Wiemer, Björn. This volume. âUnity behind diversity: What explains the distribution of perfective present in Slavic languages?â In The Slavic Verb. Part 1: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Simeon Dekker, Egbert Fortuin, and Jaap Kamphuis, 286â348. Leiden; Boston: Brill.
von Wright, Georg H. 1963. Norm and Action. A Logical Inquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Yanovich, Igor. 2013a. âFour Pieces for Modality, Context and Usage.â PhD diss., Massachussets Institute of Technology.
Yanovich, Igor. 2013b. âDeontic Scope Restrictions Beyond Polarity.â In Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, edited by Maria Aloni, Michael Franke, and Floris Roelofsen, 257â264. Amsterdam: ILLC.
Yanovich, Igor. 2014. âSymbouletic Modality.â In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 10, edited by Christopher Piñón, 161â178. N.p. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss10/eiss10_yanovich.pdf (last access: September 27th, 2024).
Zhamaletdinova, Elmira. 2022. âThe Trajectory of the âMožno ja X?â Construction: Variation in Speech Acts of Request in Contemporary Russian.â Russian Linguistics 46 (2): 133â164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-022-09265-6.
hrWaC = Croatian Web Corpus (https://www.clarin.si/noske/all.cgi/first_form?corpname=hrwac;align=; last access: September 27th, 2024).
NKRJa = Nacionalânyj Korpus Russkogo Jazyka (https://ruscorpora.ru/; last access: September 27th, 2024).
SrpKor = Korpus savremenog srpskog jezika (http://www.korpus.matf.bg.ac.rs/korpus/korpus2013adv.php; last access: September 27th, 2024).
srWaC = Serbian Web Corpus (https://www.clarin.si/noske/all.cgi/first_form?corpname=srwac;align=; last access: September 27th, 2024).
syn2015 = Synchronnà reprezentativnà korpus (https://www.korpus.cz/kontext/query?corpname=syn2015; last access: September 27th, 2024).
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 127 | 127 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Settings | Accessibility | Legal Notice | Sitemap | Copyright © 2016-2026