Issues, Challenges, and Dilemmas in Conducting Research on Restorative Justice

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Becoming a Brill Author

Publishing Ethics & AI Policy

Publishing Guides

General Open Access Information

For Authors

For Academic Societies

Metadata: Title Lists, MARC & KBART Files

Catalogs, Flyers and Price Lists

Accessing Brill Products

About Brill & its History

Imprints

Careers

Organization

Corporate Social Responsibility

求助

Part 2 Issues, Challenges, and Dilemmas in Conducting Research on Restorative Justice

于Handbook on Methods in Restorative Justice Research

编者：

Katrine Barnekow Rasmussen

Katrine Barnekow Rasmussen
Search for other papers by Katrine Barnekow Rasmussen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

Fernanda Fonseca Rosenblatt

Fernanda Fonseca Rosenblatt
Search for other papers by Fernanda Fonseca Rosenblatt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

Brunilda Pali

Brunilda Pali
Search for other papers by Brunilda Pali in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

, and

Estelle Zinsstag

Estelle Zinsstag
Search for other papers by Estelle Zinsstag in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

类型:: 章节

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€42.00€35.00 excl. VAT

Add to Cart

找回访问令牌

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share Link

Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789004729827/b_9789004729827-part2.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

折叠
展开
回到页面顶端

Handbook on Methods in Restorative Justice Research

丛编： Monographs and edited collections, 卷： 8/M-5and Studies in Restorative Justice, 卷： 8/M-5

ISBN:: 9789004729827

出版社:: Brill | Nijhoff

印刷出版日期:: 08 Dec 2025

Subjects

Front Matter

Preliminary Material

About the Series

Acknowledgments

Notes on Contributors

Introduction. Mapping the Path: Exploring Methods in Restorative Justice Research

Part 1 Disciplinary Approaches, Perspectives and Methodological Contributions

Chapter 1 Goffman’s Useful but Seductive Metaphors: A Researcher’s Journey When Analysing Victim-Offender Mediation

Chapter 2 Restorative Justice and Historical Criminology in Context and Practice: A Study of Nineteenth Century Printed Public Apologies

Chapter 3 The Value of Researching Restorative Justice Policy through Discourse Analysis

Chapter 4 ‘Philo-sophia’

Chapter 5 Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and Restorative Justice

Chapter 6 Investigating Restorative Justice through Participatory Action Research

Chapter 7 Countering Injustice as Re-storying: A Narrative Perspective on Restorative Justice

Chapter 8 Researching and Empowering the Publics: The Application of Restorative Approaches in Attitudinal Research

Chapter 9 Observing Communication in Restorative Encounters

Chapter 10 ‘Living’ Ethnography: A Culturally Responsive Research Approach for Investigating Restorative Justice in a Cretan Highland Community

Chapter 11 Restorative Justice Viewed from below: Exploring the Value of ‘Ethnography at Home’ and Emic Theory

Chapter 12 Reoffending Research versus Desistance Research in Restorative Justice: Competing or Complementary Paradigms?

Chapter 13 Researching Restorative Justice in an Environmental Regulatory Organisation

Part 2 Issues, Challenges, and Dilemmas in Conducting Research on Restorative Justice

Chapter 14 The Use of Surveys within a Mixed Method Project to Research ‘Under the Radar’ Practices

Chapter 15 The Art of Interviewing in Restorative Justice Research

Chapter 16 Researching Restorative Justice and Honour-Based Violence

Chapter 17 Video-Based Research of Restorative Interactions: Challenges and Benefits

Chapter 18 Researching Restorative Justice in the Police

Chapter 19 Rigor versus Ethics? Some Considerations for Researching Victims’ Experiences in Restorative Justice

Chapter 20 Sense and Sensitivity: Reflections on Qualitative Interviews with People who Experienced Adversity and Harm

Chapter 21 Ethical Dilemmas in Restorative Justice Research

Part 3 Ways of Knowing Restoratively

Chapter 22 Affective Methods for Restorative Justice Research and Communication

Chapter 23 ‘All Parts of the Circle Are Equal’ … or Are They? The Dilemma of Co-creation in an Island and Practice-Based Restorative Justice Study

Chapter 24 Making the Case for Restorative Justice Practitioners Researching Their Own Practice

Chapter 25 Autoethnography in Restorative Justice Research: A Relational Methodology

Chapter 26 Decolonising Research Methods in Restorative Justice In Education

Back Matter

Index

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

BibTeX

Zotero

EndNote

Andrews, M. (2005). Who is being heard? Response bias in open-ended responses in a large government employee survey. Paper presented at the 60th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, FL. Retrieved from: http://www.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/y2005f.html.
Baruch, Y, & Holtom, B.C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Braithwaite, J. (2002) Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brannen, J. (2005). Mixed methods research: A discussion paper. esrc National Centre for Research Methods, ncrm Methods Review Papers NCRM/005. Retrieved from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/89/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-005.pdf.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
Cameron, A. (2006) Stopping the violence: Canadian feminist debates on restorative justice and intimate violence. Theoretical Criminology, 10, 49–66.
Centre for Innovative Justice. (2014). Innovative justice responses to sexual offending. Pathways to better outcomes for victims, offenders and the community. rmit University, Melbourne. Retrieved from: http://mams.rmit.edu.au/qt1g6twlv0q3.pdf.
Couper, M.P., Kennedy, C., Conrad, F.G., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Designing input fields for non-narrative open-ended responses in web surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 27(1), 65–85.
Cossins, A, (2008). Restorative justice and child sex offences. The theory and the practice. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 359–378.
Couture, J., Parker, T., Couture, R. & Laboucane, P. (2001). A cost-benefit analysis of Hollow Water Community holistic healing circle process. Ontario: Solicitor General of Canada.
Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2005). Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 87–98.
Daly, K. (2006). Restorative justice and sexual assault: an archival study of court and conference cases. British Journal of Criminology, 46(2), 334–356.
Daly, K. (2011). Conventional and innovative justice responses to sexual violence. Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, 12. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Daly, K., Bouhours, B., Broadhurst, R & Loh, N. (2013). Youth sex offending, recidivism and restorative justice: comparing court and conference cases. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 4(2), 241–267.
Daly, K. & Stubbs, J. (2006). Feminist engagement with restorative justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10, 9–28.
De Leeuw, E.D. & De Heer, W. (2002). Trends in household survey nonresponse: a longitudinal and international comparison. In R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge & R.J.A. Little (eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 41–54). New York: John Wiley.
De Rada, V.D. & Domínguez-Álvarez, J.A. (2014). Response quality of self-administered questionnaires: a comparison between paper and web questionnaires. Social Science Computer Review, 32(2), 256–269.
Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D. & Christian, L.M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. New York: Wiley.
Fazekas, Z., Wall, M.T., & Krouwel, A. (2014). Is it what you say, or how you say it? An experimental analysis of the effects of invitation wording for online panel surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(2), 235–244.
Grimes, W. (2012). When businesses can’t stop asking, ‘how am I doing?’ The New York Times, 16th March 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/17/business/onslaught-of-surveys-is-fraying-customer-patience.html?pagewanted=alland_r=0.
Gustafson, D. (2005). Exploring treatment and trauma recovery implications in facilitating victim-offender encounters in crimes of severe violence: lessons from the Canadian experience. In E. Elliot, & R. Gordon (eds.), New directions in restorative justice (pp. 193–227). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Holley, L. (2012). Satisfaction survey overload. International Customer Management Institute, 12th January 2012. Retrieved from http://www.icmi.com/Resources/Customer-Experience/2012/01/Satisfaction-Survey-Overload.
Hudson, B. (1998). Restorative justice: the challenge of racial and sexual violence. Journal of Law and Society, 25(2), 237–256.
Hudson. B. (2003). Understanding justice: an introduction to ideas, perspectives and controversies in modern penal theory. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ivankova, N.V., Creswell, J.W. & Stick, S.L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20.
Julich, S.J., Buttle, J., Cummins, C. & Freeborn, E. (2010). Project Restore: an exploratory study of restorative justice and sexual violence. Auckland: aut University.
Kaplowitz, M.D., Lupi, F., Couper, M.P. & Thorp, L. (2012). The effect of invitation design on web survey response rates. Social Science Computer Review, 30(3), 339–349.
Keenan, M. (2014). Sexual trauma and abuse: restorative and transformative possibilities? A collaborative study on the potential of restorative justice in sexual crimes in Ireland. Dublin: University College Dublin. Retrieved from https://researchrepository.ucd.ie/handle/10197/6247.
Keenan, M. (2017). Criminal justice, restorative justice, sexual violence and the rule of law. In E. Zinsstag & M. Keenan, (eds.) (2017). Restorative responses to sexual violence: legal, social and therapeutic dimensions. London: Routledge (pp. 44–68).
Keenan, M & Griffith A. (2019). Two Women’s Journeys towards Restorative Justice after sexual violence. In Pali B., K. Lauwaert, & S. Pleysier (eds). The Praxis of Justice. Eleven Publishing. The Hague: The Netherlands
Keenan, M. & Griffith A. (2021). Restorative justice after sexual violence: an international perspective. In R. Killean, E. Dowds & A-M McAlinden (Eds). Sexual Violence on Trial: Local and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 187–198). doi:
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Keenan, M. & Zinsstag, E. (2014). Restorative justice and sexual offenses: can ‘changing lenses’ be appropriate in this case too? Monatschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 97(1), 93–106.
Keenan, M. & Zinsstag, E. (2022). Sexual violence and restorative justice: addressing the justice gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keenan, M., Zinsstag, E. & O’Nolan, C. (2016). Sexual violence and restorative practices in Belgium, Ireland and Norway: a thematic analysis of country variations. Restorative Justice: an International Journal, 4(1), 86–114.
Koss, M.P. (2014). The RESTORE program of restorative justice for sex crimes: vision, process and outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(9),1623–1660.
Leppik, P. (2014). Combatting survey overload. Vocalabs’. Blog posted on May 16, 2014 in Survey Design and Technique. Retrieved from https://www.vocalabs.com/blog/combatting-survey-overload.
Liebmann, M. (2007). Restorative Justice: how it works. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Lonsway, K., & Archambault, J. (2012). The ‘justice gap’ for sexual assault cases: future directions for research and reform. Violence Against Women, 18(2), 145–168.
Lovett, J. & Kelly, L. (2009). Different systems, similar outcomes? Tracking attrition in reported rape cases across Europe. London: Child and Women Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University.
McGee, H., Garavan, R., De Barra, M., Byrne, J. & Conroy, R. (2002). ThesaviReport: sexual abuse and violence in Ireland. A national study of Irish experiences, beliefs and attitudes concerning sexual violence. Dublin: The Liffey Press.
Milner, S. (2011). After the crime: the power of restorative justice dialogues between victims and violent offenders. New York: New York University Press.
Monk-Shepherd, R., & Nation, D. (1995) Mediation in prison following incest. Probation Journal, 42, 26–30.
Morse, J.M. (2003). Principles of mixed method and multi-method research design. In C. Teddlie, & A. Tashakkori (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (pp. 189–208). London: Sage.
National Commission on Restorative Justice (Ireland). (2009). Final report. Dublin: Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform.
Nelund. A. (2015) Policy conflict: Women’s groups and institutionalized restorative justice. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(1), 65–84.
O’Nolan, C., Zinsstag, E. & Keenan, M. (2018). Researching ‘under the radar’ practices: exploring restorative practices in sexual violence cases. Temida: The Journal on Victimization, Gender and Human Rights, 21(1), 107–130.
Pali, B., & Madsen, K.S. (2011). Dangerous liaison? A feminist and restorative approach to sexual assault. Temida, 14(1), 49–65.
Porter, S.R., Whitcomb, M.E. & Weitzer, W.H. (2004). Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New directions for institutional research, 121, 63–73.
Ptacek, J. (ed.) (2010). Restorative justice and violence against women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Regan, L., & Kelly, L. (2003). Rape: still a forgotten issue? London: Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University.
Roberts, T. (1995). Evaluation of the victim offender mediation project, Langley, British Columbia: final report. Victoria: Tim Roberts Focus Consultants.
Scholz, E. & Zuell, C. (2012). Item non-response in open-ended questions: who does not answer on the meaning of left and right? Social Science Research, 41(6), 1415–1428.
Silber, H., Lischewski, J. & Leibold, J. (2013). Comparing different types of web surveys: Examining drop-outs, non-response and social desirability. Metodološki zvezki, 10(2), 121–143.
Shapland, J., Buchan, J., Kirkwood, S. & Zinsstag, E. (2022) Mitigation and risk in restorative justice. Project report for Scottish Government.
Shields, C.M. (2003). ‘Giving voice’ to students: using the internet for data collection. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 397–414.
Shin, E., Johnson, T.P. & Rao. K. (2012). Survey mode effects on data quality: comparison of web and mail modes in a U.S. national panel survey. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 212–228.
Stoop, I.A.L. (2005). The hunt for the last respondent: nonresponse in sample surveys. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands (scp).
Strang, H., Sherman, L.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Woods, D. & Ariel, B. (2013). Restorative justice conferencing using face-to-face meetings of offenders and victims: effects on offender recidivism and victim satisfaction. A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. Oslo: Campbell Collaborations. Retrieved from www.campbellcollaboration.org.
Stubbs, J. (2002). Domestic violence and women’s safety: Feminist challenges to restorative justice. In H. Strang, & J. Braithwaite (eds.), Restorative justice and family violence (pp. 42–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stulberg, T.L. (2011). The restorative justice program evaluation. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
Sudman, S. & Bradburn, N.M. (1982) Asking questions: a practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences. Los Angeles/London: Sage.
Tolonen, H., Helakorpi, S., Talala, K., Helasoja, V., Martelin, T. & Prattala, R. (2006). 25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. European Journal of Epidemiology, 21, 409–415.
Umbreit. M.S., Vos, B., Coates, R.B., & Brown, K. (2003). Facing violence: the path of restorative justice and dialogue. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
United Nations. (2006). Handbook on restorative justice programs. Vienna: UN Office on Drugs and Crime.
vaw Network (2022). OPEN LETTER to Scottish Government: Scottish Government proposals to implement Restorative Justice processes in domestic abuse and sexual violence crimes. On file with author.
Van Wormer, K. (2009). Restorative justice as social justice for victims of gendered violence: a standpoint feminist perspective. Social Work, 54(2),107–116.
Woolford, A. (2009). The politics of restorative justice. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
World Health Organization (2021). Sexual violence. Available at https://apps.who.int/violence-info/sexual-violence/#:~:text=Sexual%20violence%20is%20any%20sexual,the%20victim%2C%20in%20any%20setting.
Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses: a new focus for crime and justice. Harrisonburg: Herald Press.
Zinsstag, E. & Keenan, M. (eds.) (2017). Restorative responses to sexual violence: legal, social and therapeutic dimensions. London: Routledge.
Zinsstag, E., Teunkens, M. & Pali, B. (2011) Conferencing: a way forward for restorative justice in Europe – Final report of JLS/2008/JPEN/043, Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice (efrj).
Andersen, N. (1923). The Hobo: the sociology of the homeless man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bacher, J., Kannonier-Finster, W. & Ziegler, M. (ed.) (2019). Marie Jahoda: Arbeitslose bei der Arbeit. Aufsätze und Essays. Wien: Studienverlag.
Blackstone, A. (2012). Principles of sociological inquiry – quantitative and qualitative methods. Washington, D.C.: Saylor Foundation.
Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A. & Tipton, S.M. (1985). Habits of the heart: individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Booth, C. (1902–1903). Life and labour of the people in London. London: Macmillan.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). The weight of the world. Social suffering in contemporary society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Cartabia, M. (2023). Restorative justice: what I was looking for. Speech at the opening session of the International Conference of the efrj: Justice beyond borders: restorative connections through space and language. Newsletter ofefrj, vol. 23/2.
Dinkins, C.S. (2013). Dialog on a country path. The qualitative Research Journey. Nurse Education Today, 34(3). DOI: .
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Devault, M. (1990). Talking and listening from women’s standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems, 37, 96–116.
Fleck, C. & Zillian, H. (eds.) (1989). Marie Jahoda. Arbeitslose bei der Arbeit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag GmbH.
Fontana, A. & Frey, J.H. (1994). Interviewing: the art of science. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–376). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Froschauer, U. & Lueger, M. (2003). Das qualitative Interview. Zur Praxis interpretativer Analyse sozialer Systeme. Wien: uva Universitätsverlag.
Fujii, L.A. (2018). Interviewing in social science research: a relational approach. New York: Routledge.
Goethe, W. (1949). Briefe an Auguste zu Stolberg. Wiesbaden: Insel Verlag. E-book release, May 23, 2015 (# 49024).
Heistinger, A. (2006) Qualitative Interviews – Ein Leitfaden zu Vorbereitung und Durchführung inclusive einiger theoretischer Anmerkungen. Retrieved from www.uibk.ac.at/iezw/mitarbeiterinnen/seniorlecturer/berndlederer/downloads/durchführung von qualitativen interviews uniwien.pdf (last accessed 15 June 2024).
Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P.F. & Zeisel, H. (1972). Marienthal: a sociography of an unemployed community [Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal]. London: Tavistock.
Latour, B. (1988). Scientific objects and legal objectivity. Science & Law English, 88, 1–42.
Lenski, G.E. & Leggett, J.C. (1960). Caste, class, and deference in the research interview. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 463–467. .
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Maindok, H. (2003). Professionelle Interviewführung in der Sozialforschung. Herbolzheim: Centauris Verlag.
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mey, G. & Mruck, K. (2007). Qualitative Interviews. In G. Naderer & E. Balzer (eds.), Qualitative Marktforschung in Theorie und Praxis. Grundlagen, Methoden und Anwendungen (pp. 247–252). Wiesbaden: Gabler. https://nbnresolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-2994.
Müller, R. (1995). Marie Jahoda, Sozialpsychologie der Politik und Kultur. Ausgewählte Schriften. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften, 6(2), 335–337.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts. Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W. (1984). The City (1st ed. 1925). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rebschläger, M. (1995). Zur Bedeutung von Interviewereffekten im sozio-ökonomischen Panel, Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
Reuband, K.H. & Meulemann, H. (eds.) (1984). Soziale Realität im Interview. Empirische Analysen methodischer Probleme. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag GmbH.
Rosenblatt, F.F. & Farias, K.A.D. (2021). Where is ‘race’ in restorative justice? Creating space for book reviews ‘with a focus’. The International Journal of Restorative Justice 2021, 4(3), 487–495. doi: .
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Roulston. K. (2013). Asking questions and individual interviews. In K. Roulston (ed.), Reflective Interviewing. A guide to theory and practice (pp. 9–33). New York: Routledge.
Sorokin, P. (1947). Society, culture, and personality: Their structure and dynamics. A system general sociology. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Steger, T. (2003). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. Chemnitz: Schriften zur Organisationswissenschaft.
Steinar, K. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.
Steinert, H. (1984). Das Interview als soziale Interaktion. In H. Meulemann & K.-H. Reuband (eds.) Soziale Realität im Interview. Empirische Analysen methodischer Probleme (pp. 18–59). Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag GmbH.
Steinert, H. (ed.) (1973). Symbolische Interaktion. Arbeiten zu einer reflexiven Soziologie. Konzepte der Humanwissenschaften. Stuttgart: Klett Verlag.
Tanggaard, L. (2008). Objections in research interviewing. International Journal ofqualitative methods, 7(3). Retrieved from: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) (last accessed 15 June 2024).
Thrasher, F.M. (1927). The gang: a study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weiss, R. (1994). Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.
Wright Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Znaniecki, F. &Thomas, W. (1918–1920). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Boston: Gorham Press.
Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5–32.
Aplin, R. (2019). Policing UK honour-based abuse crime. Leeds: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bates, L. (2018). Female perpetrators of honour-based violence: conspirators, collaborators, coerced? Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 10(4), 293–303.
bbc (2013). Secrets of Britain’s Sharia Councils. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01rxfjt (last accessed 20 Novembre 2023).
Black, D. (1976). The behaviour of law. New York: Academic Press.
Blagg, H. (2002). Restorative justice and aboriginal family violence: opening a space for healing. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (eds.), Restorative justice and family violence (pp. 191–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brandon, J. & Hafez, S. (2008). Crimes of the community. Honour-based violence in the UK. London: Civitas.
cedaw (2013). Concluding Observations of the Seventh Periodic Report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2013 by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (cedaw/C/gbr/CO/7). Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Crigoni1/Downloads/CEDAW_C_GBR_CO_7-EN.pdf (last accessed 20 November 2023).
Chantler, K. & Gangoli, G. (2011). Violence against women in minoritised communities: cultural norm or cultural anomaly? In R.K. Thiara, S.A. Condon & M. Schröttle (eds.), Violence against women and ethnicity: commonalities and differences across Europe (pp. 353–366). Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Crenshaw, K.W. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of colour. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Danna, D. & Cavenaghi, P. (2011). Transformative mediation in forced marriage cases. Interdisciplinary Journal of Family Studies, xvii(2), 45–62.
Directorate of Integration and Diversity (2008). Integration map 2008. Forced marriage – an information base. Oslo.
Ertürk, Y. (2009). Towards a post-patriarchal gender order: Confronting the universality and the particularity of violence against women. Sociologisk Forskning, 46(4), 61–70.
Fundamental Rights Agency (2014). Addressing forced marriage in the EU: legal provisions and promising practices. Retrieved from https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-forced-marriage-eu_en.pdf.pdf (last accessed 23 November 2023).
Gill, A. (2013). Feminist reflections on researching so-called ‘honour’ killings. Feminist Legal Studies, 21(3), 241–261.
Gimse, G.A. (2010). Norway: we might be on the right track. European Forum for Restorative Justice Newsletter, 11(3), 2–5.
Idriss, M.M. (2017). Key agent and survivor recommendations for intervention in honour-based violence in the UK. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 42(4), 321–339.
Jahan, F. (2008). When women protect women: restorative justice. New Delhi: South Asian Publisher.
Mulvihill, N., Gangoli, G., Gill, A. & Hester, M. (2018). The experience of interactional justice for victims of honour−based violence and abuse reporting to the police in England and Wales. Policing and Society, 29(6), 1–17.
Nielsen, F. (2013). Cross−cultural mediation method in honour−related conflicts. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/66709741 (last accessed 16 March 2022).
Rigoni, C. (2023). Honour-Based Violence and Forced Marriages. Community and Restorative Practices in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
Roberts, K.A., Campbell, G. & Glen, L. (2014). Honour−based violence policing and prevention. Boca Raton: crc Press.
Schlytter, A. & Linnell, H. (2010). Girls without honour related problems in a comparative perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(2), 152–161.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: sage.
Tas, L. (2013a). One State, Plural Options: Kurds in the UK. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 45(2), 167–189.
Tas, L. (2013b). Resolving Family Disputes in the Gurbet: The Role of Kurdish Peace Committee and Roj Women. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3(6), 1111–1135.
Tas, L. (2014a). Legal pluralism in action. Dispute resolution and the Kurdish Peace Committee. Farnham: Ashgate.
Tas, L. (2014b). Kurdish “Unofficial” Family Law in the Gurbet. In P. Shah, M.-C. Foblets, & M. Rohe (eds.), Family, Religion and Law (pp. 209–235). Farnham: Ashgate.
Thiara, R.K., Condon, S.A. & Schröttle, M. (2011). Violence against women and ethnicity: commonalities and differences across Europe. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Argyle, M. (2013): Körpersprache und Kommunikation. Paderborn: Junfermann.
Asmussen, I. (2015). Performing absolution narratives in restorative justice. Restorative Justice: an International Journal, 3(1), 28–48.
Bamberg, M. (2020). Narrative analysis. An integrated approach. In M. Järvinen & N. Mik-Meyer (eds.), Qualitative analysis: eight approaches to the social sciences (pp. 243–264). London: Sage.
Bamberg, M. (2010). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 1–22.
Bergmann, J. (1985). Flüchtigkeit und methodische Fixierung sozialer Wirklichkeit: Aufzeichnungen als Daten der interpretativen Soziologie. In W. Bonß & H. Hartmann (eds.), Entzauberte Wissenschaft: Zur Relativität der Geltung soziologischer Forschung (pp. 299–320). Göttingen: Schwarz.
Blumer, H. (1969). Society as symbolic interaction. In H. Blumer (ed.), Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method (pp. 78–89). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bolitho J. (2017). Inside the restorative justice black box: the role of memory reconsolidation in transforming the emotional impact of violent crime on victims. International Review of Victimology, 23(3), 233–255. doi:
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Bruce, J. (2013). Understanding ‘back stage’ and ‘front stage’ work in restorative justice conferences: the benefits of using ethnographic techniques. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 25(1), 517–526.
Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution. An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.
Cobb, S. (1994). A narrative perspective on mediation: toward the materialization of the ‘storytelling’ metaphor. In J. Folgers & T. Jones (eds.), New directions in mediation: communication, research and perspectives (pp. 48–63). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
De Fina, A. (2015). Narrative and identity. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (eds.), The handbook of narrative inquiry (pp. 351–368). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Deppermann, A. (2018). Sprache mit der multimodalen Interaktion. In A. Deppermann & S. Reineke (eds.), Sprache im kommunikativen, interaktiven und kulturellen Kontext (pp. 51–85). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Dinkelaker, J. & Herrle, M. (2009). Erziehungswissenschaftliche Videographie: eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2015). Small stories research: methods – analysis – outreach. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (eds.), The handbook of narrative inquiry (pp. 255–271). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Goffman, E. (1990 [1959]). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Vol. ii: Lifeworld and system. Boston: Beacon.
Haw, K. & Hadfield, M. (2011). Video in social science research: functions and forms. London & New York: Routledge.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J. & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: analysing social interactions in everyday life. London: Sage.
Hopf, C. (2012). Forschungsethik und qualitative Forschung. In U. Flick, E.V. Kardorff & I. Steinke (eds.), Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch (pp. 589–599). Reinbek: Rowohlt.
Hulsman, L. (1986). Critical criminology and the concept of crime. Contemporary crises: crime, law, social policy, 10(1), 63–80.
Imo, W. & Lanwer, J.P. (2019). Interaktionale Linguistik. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Knoblauch, H. (2005). Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503440 (last accessed 3 May 2020).
Knoblauch, H., Tuma, R. & Schnettler, B. (2013). Video analysis and videography. In U. Flick (ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 435–449). London: Sage.
Krummheuer, A. (2009). Conversation analysis, video recordings, and human-computer interchanges. In U. Kissmann (ed.), Video interaction analysis: methods and methodology (pp. 59–83). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Langdon, J. (2016). Talk it out: toward a narrative theory of community conferencing. Contemporary Justice Review, 19(1),19–30.
Laurier, E. & Philo, C. (2012). Natural problems of naturalistic video data. In H. Knoblauch, B., Schnettler, H.-G. Soeffner & J. Raab (eds.), Video analysis: methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (pp. 183–190). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Loer, T. (2010). Videoaufzeichnungen in der interpretativen Sozialforschung. Sozialer Sinn. 11(2), 319–352.
Molden, D. (2014). Understanding priming effects in social psychology: what is ‘social priming’ and how does it occur? Social Cognition, 32 (special issue), 1–11.
Moritz, C. (ed.) (2014). Transkription von Video und Filmdaten in der Qualitativen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Oevermann, U. (2002). Klinische Soziologie auf der Basis der Methodologie der objektiven Hermeneutik – Manifest der objektiv hermeneutischen Sozialforschung. Retrieved from https://www.ihsk.de/publikationen/Ulrich_Oevermann-Manifest_der_objektiv_hermeneutischen_Sozialforschung.pdf (last accessed 14 February 2022).
Oevermann, U. (2000). Die Methode der Fallrekonstruktion in der Grundlagenforschung sowie der klinischen und pädagogischen Praxis. In K. Kraimer (ed.), Die Fallrekonstruktion. Sinnverstehen in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung (pp. 58–156). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5 (2), 243–263.
Rosenthal, G. (2018). Interpretive social research: an introduction. Göttingen: University Press.
Rypi, A. (2017). ‘You don’t have to say it straight out…’: Directed impression management at victim-offender mediation pre-meetings. Sociological Focus, 50(3), 261–276.
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Meyer, C., Oberzaucher, F. & Uhmann, S. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: gat 2. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51.
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: the manufacture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Tuma, R., Schnettler, B. & Knoblauch, H. (2013). Videographie. Eine Einführung in die interpretative Videoanalyse sozialer Situationen. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Witte, N. & Rosenthal, G. (2018). Analyzing video films. In G. Rosenthal (ed.), Interpretive social research: An introduction (pp. 108–121). Göttingen: University Press.
Abrahamsen, M.H. (2018). Et forsøg på at forbinde fængslet og omverdenen. – En sociologisk undersøgelse af hvad der sker, når omverdenen lukkes inden for i fængslet [An Attempt to Connect the Prison and the Outside World]. PhD thesis. Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen.
Andersson, S. (2003). Ordnande praktiker: En studie av status, homosocialitet och maskuliniteter utifrån två närpolisorganisationer [Orderly practices: a study of status, homosociality and masculinites from two local police stations]. Stockholm: Pedagogiske institutionen, Stockholms Universitet.
Ashby, D., Irving, B. & Longley, P. (2007). Police reform and the new public management paradigm: matching technology to the rhetoric. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 159–175.
Balvig, F., Holmberg, L. & Højlund Nielsen, M.P. (2011). Verdens bedste Politi. Politireformen i Danmark 2007–2011 [The world’s best police. The police reforn in Denmark 2007–2011]. Copenhagen: Jurist- og økonomiforbundets forlag.
Bittner, E. (1967). The police on skid row: a study of peace keeping. American Sociological Review, 32, 699–717.
Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of the police in modern society: a review of background factors, current practices, and possible role models. Chevy Chase: National Institute of Mental Health.
Bittner, E. (1974). Florence Nightingale in pursuit of Willie Sutton: a theory of the police. In H. Jacob (ed.), The potential for reform of criminal justice (pp. 285–305). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Davis, K.C. (1975). Police discretion. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.
Davis, K.C. (1969). Discretionary justice. A preliminary inquiry. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press
DeWalt, K.M. & DeWalt, B.R (2011). Participant observation – A guide for fieldworkers. (2nd ed.). Lanham: AltaMira Press.
Fielding, N. & Innes, M. (2006). Reassurance policing, community policing and measuring police performance. Policing & Society, 16(2), 127–145.
Finstad, L. (2000). Politiblikket [The police gaze]. Olso: Pax Forlag.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books
Granér, R. (2004). Patrullerande polisers yrkeskultur [Working culture of patrolling police]. Socialhögskolan, Lunds Universtitet.
Grønborg, L. (2012). Forskeren og felten: et dobbelsidet spejl. Om brugen af subjektivitet i deltagerobservation [The Researcher and the Field: A Double-sided Mirror. On using subjetivity in participatory observation]. In M., Pedersen, M., Klitmøller, J. & Nielsen, K. (eds.), Deltagerobservation – en metode til undersøgelse af psykologiske fænomener [Participatory observation – a method for examining psycological phenomena] (pp. 135–148). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Gurney, J.N. (1985). Not one of the guys: the female researcher in a male-dominated setting. Qualitative Sociology, 8(1), 42–62.
Görtz, D. (2015). Etnifierade polispraktiker. Hur etnicitet görs I polisers vardag [Etnified police practices. How ethnicity is done in the everyday of police]. Lund: Lund University.
Hoogenboezem, J. & Hoogenboezem, D. (2005). Coping with targets: performance measurement in The Netherlands police. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(7), 568–578.
Holmberg, L. (1999). Politiets skøn i retssociologisk belysning [Police discretion in the light of sociology of law] PhD thesis. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Holmberg, L. (2003). Policing stereotypes. A qualitative study of police work in Denmark. Berlin: Galda + Wlich Verlag.
Holmberg, L. (2014). Scandinavian police reforms: can you have your cake and eat it, too? Police practice and research, 15(6), 447–460.
Høigård, C. (2011). Policing the north. Crime and Justice, 40, 265–348.
Jakobsen, K.K., Stridbeck, U. & Langballe, Å. (2018). Objektivitet i avhør. Avhør av fornærmede i straffesaker i Norge [Objectivity in interrogation. Interrogating victims in Norwegian court cases]. Tidsskrift for strafferett, 18(02), pp. 74–101.
Kyvsgaard, B. (2016). Evaluering af Konfliktråd [Evaluation of the Danish vom programme]. Copenhagen: Justitsministeriets Forskningskontor.
Kyvsgaard, B. & Ribe, M. Ø. (2018). Effekten af konfliktmægling for ofre [The effect of vom for victims]. Copenhagen: Justitsministeriets Forskningskontor.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Maguire, E.R. (2003). Organisational structure in American police agencies: context, complexity and control. New York: State University of New York Press.
Marder, I.D. (2018). Restorative justice and the police: exploring the institutionalisation of restorative justice in two English forces. The University of Leeds School of Law Centre for Criminal Justice Studies Centre for Law and Social Justice.
McLaughlin, E. (ed.) (2006). The new policing. London: Sage Publications.
Moore, M.H. & Braga, A.A. (2003). Measuring and improving police performance: the lessons of Compstat and its progeny. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26(3), 439–453.
Muir, W.K. (1977). Police. Streetcorner politicians. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Olhoff-Jakobsen, E.E. (2013). Politiet forhindrede offentliggørelse af rapport om afhøringer [The police stopped the publishing of reports on interrogation]. Berlingske Tidende, May 1st, 2013. Retrieved from: https://www.berlingske.dk/samfund/politiet-forhindrede-offentliggoerelse-af-rapport-om-afhoeringer (last accessed 10 December 2019).
Peterson, A. (2008). Who ‘owns’ the street? Ritual performances of respect and authority in interactions between young men and police officers. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 9(2), 97–118.
Potter, J. (1996). Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: theoretical background. In J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 125–140). Leicester: BPS Books.
Rasmussen, K.B. (2018). When is restorative justice? Exploring the implications of restorative processes in juvenile offence cases based on interviews and observations in Northern Ireland, Norway, and Orlando, Florida. In A. Nylund, K. Ervasti, L. Adrian (eds.), Nordic mediation research (pp. 145–179). Cham: Springer Open.
Rasmussen, K.B. (2020a). Victim-offender mediation in Denmark: or how institutional placement and organisation matter. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 3(2), 235–261.
Rasmussen, K.B. (2020b). The police as gatekeepers of restorative justice – Perspectives of professionals, perspectives on professionals. Nordisk Politiforskning, 2, 137–159.
Rasmussen, K.B. (2021). Ethnic bias in restorative processes? An analysis of access to the police-based national Danish vom-programme. The Police Journal.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Reiner, R. (1992). Police research in the United Kingdom: a critical review. Crime and Justice, 15, 435–508.
Scharling, N. (2016). Politikadetterne kommer [The police cadets are coming]. Dansk Politi, December 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.dansk-politi.dk/nyheder/politikadetterne-kommer (last accessed 10 December 2019).
Scharling, N. (2017). 10.600 politifolk – men kun 6.000 til klassisk politiarbejde [10.600 police officers – but only 6.000 for classical police work]. Dansk Politi, April, 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.dansk-politi.dk/nyheder/10600-politifolk-men-kun-6000-til-klassisk-politiarbejde (last accessed 10 December 2019).
Scharling, N. (2018). Afhøring er en svær balancegang [Interrogations are a difficult act of balance.] Interview with Kristina Kepinska Jakobsen. Dansk Politi, December 12th, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.dansk-politi.dk/nyheder/afhoring-er-svaer-balancegang (last accessed 10 December 2019).
Scharling, N. & Bjørnholdt, K. (2017). Bandekonflikt – når politisk handlekraft koster [Gang conflict – when political action costs]. Dansk Politi, September 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.dansk-politi.dk/sites/dansk-politi.dk/files/media/document/Dansk%20Politi%20nr%204-2017_low.pdf (last accessed 10 December 2019).
Skolnick, J.H. (1966). Clearance rates. In S. Rubington & M.S. Weinber (eds.), Deviance: the interactionist perspective (pp. 142–153). New York: Macmillian.
Sollund, R. (2007). Tatt for en annan. En feltstudie av relasjonen mellom etniske minoriteter og politiet [Mistaken for someone else. A field study of the relation between ethnic minorities and the police]. Olso: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
Sherman, L.W. & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative justice: the evidence. London: The Smith Institute.
Van Maanen, J. (1975). Police organisation: a longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2), 207–228.
Volquartsen, M. (2019). Politi og privat vagtvirksomhed. Retlige perspektiver på opgavefordelingen mellem politiet og den private sikkerhedsbranche [Police and Private Guarding. Legal perspectives on the roles of police and private security]. PhD thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen.
Williams, C. & Heikes, E.J. (1993). The importance of researcher’s gender in the in-depth interview: evidence from two case studies of male nurses. Gender and Society, 7(2), 280–291.
Appelbaum, P.S., Lidz, C.W. & Klitzman, R. (2009). Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model. Hastings Center Report, 39(1), 30–39.
Archibald, M.M., Ambagtsheer, R.C., Casey, M.G. & Lawless, M. (2019). Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, .
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Babbie, E.R. (2013). The practice of social research. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Becker-Blease, K.A. & Freyd, J.J. (2006). Research participants telling the truth about their lives: the ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. American Psychologist, 61(3), 218–226.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Berger, R. & Malkinson, R. (2000). ‘Therapeutising’ research: the positive impact of research on participants. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 70, 307–314.
Bolívar, D. (2013). For whom is restorative justice? A mixed-method study on victims and (non-) participation. Restorative Justice: an International Journal, 1(2), 190–214.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Bolivar, D. (2019). Restoring harm: a psychosocial approach to victims and restorative justice. London: Routledge.
Bolívar, D. & Vanfraechem, I. (2016). Víctimas en justicia restaurativa: ¿Sujetos activos o en necesidad? Un estudio europeo desde la perspectiva de operadores sociales. Universitas Psychologica, 14(4), 1437–1458.
Boyce, C. & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input (Vol. 2). Watertown: Pathfinder International.
Bredal, A., Stefansen, K. & Bjørnholt, M. (2022). Why do people participate in research interviews? Participant orientations and ethical contracts in interviews with victims of interpersonal violence. Qualitative research, 24(2), 287–304.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Brunovskis, A. & Surtees, R. (2010). Untold stories: biases and selection effects in research with victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation. International Migration, 48(4), 1–37.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Campbell, R., Goodman-Williams, R. & Javorka, M. (2019). A trauma-informed approach to sexual violence research ethics and open science. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(23–24), 4765–4793.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Chapple, A. (1999). The use of telephone interviewing for qualitative research. Nurse Researcher (through 2013), 6(3), 85–93.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.
Collogan, L.K., Tuma, F.K. & Fleischman, A.R. (2004). Research with victims of disaster: institutional review board considerations. irb: Ethics & Human Research, 26(4), 9–11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3563698
Corbin, J. & Morse, J.M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 335–354.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage publications.
Decker, S.E., Naugle, A.E., Carter-Visscher, R., Bell, K. & Seifert, A. (2011). Ethical issues in research on sensitive topics: participants’ experiences of distress and benefit. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(3), 55–64..
- Crossref
- 导出引用
DiLillo, D., DeGue, S., Kras, A., Di Loreto-Colgan, A.R. & Nash, C. (2006). Participant responses to retrospective surveys of child maltreatment: does mode of assessment matter? Violence and Victims, 21(4), 410–424.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Drake, P. (2010). Grasping at methodological understanding: a cautionary tale from insider research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 33(1), 85–99.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Elliott, D.E., Bjelajac, P., Fallot, R.D., Markoff, L.S. & Reed, B. G. (2005). Trauma‐informed or trauma‐denied: principles and implementation of trauma‐informed services for women. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(4), 461–477.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
European Parliament and Council of Europe (2012) Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/jha.
Finch, H. & Lewis, J. (2003). Focus groups. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (eds), Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 170–198). London: Sage.
Fleischman, A.R. & Wood, E.B. (2002). Ethical issues in research involving victims of terror. Journal of Urban Health, 79(3), 315–321.
Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Galea, S., Nandi, A., Stuber, J., Gold, J., Acierno, R., Best, C.L., Bucuvalas, M., Rudenstine, S., Boscarino, J. & Resnick, H. (2005). Participant reactions to survey research in the general population after terrorist attacks. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 18(5), 461–465. .
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Gray, L.M., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G.R. & Cook, K. (2020). Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: Zoom video communications. The Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1292–1301.
Griffin, M.G., Resick, P.A., Waldrop, A.E. & Mechanic, M.B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: is there evidence of harm? Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 16(3), 221–227.
Heath, J., Williamson, H., Williams, L. & Harcourt, D. (2018). ‘It’s just more personal’: Using multiple methods of qualitative data collection to facilitate participation in research focusing on sensitive subjects. Applied Nursing Research, 43, 30–35.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Heiselberg, L. & Stępińska, A. (2022). Transforming qualitative interviewing techniques for video conferencing platforms. Digital Journalism, 1353–1364.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Hennink, M., Hutter, I. & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. London: Sage Publications.
Hennink, M.M. (2013). Focus group discussions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C. & Baptista Lucio, P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Holt, A. (2010). Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 113–121.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Hlavka, H.R., Kruttschnitt, C. & Carbone-López, K.C. (2007). Revictimising the victims? Interviewing women about interpersonal violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(7), 894–920.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (inei). 2022 informe técnico Estadísticas de las Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en los Hogares, Peru. Retrieved from https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/boletines/02-informe-tecnico-tic-i-trimestre-2022.pdf (last accessed 2 July 2024).
Irvine, A. (2011). Duration, dominance and depth in telephone and face-to-face interviews: a comparative exploration. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 202–220.
Jaffe, A.E., DiLillo, D., Hoffman, L., Haikalis, M. & Dykstra, R.E. (2015). Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 40–56.
Jamieson, M.K., Govaart, G.H. & Pownall, M. (2022). Reflexivity in quantitative research: a rationale and beginner’s guide. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1–15.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Joinson, A.N., Paine, C., Buchanan, T. & Reips, U.D. (2008). Measuring self-disclosure online: blurring and non-response to sensitive items in web-based surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2158–2171.
Kvale, S. (1994). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus group methodology: principle and practice. London: Sage publications.
Logan, T.K., Walker, R., Shannon, L. & Cole, J. (2008). Combining ethical considerations with recruitment and follow-up strategies for partner violence victimisation research. Violence Against Women, 14(11), 1226–1251.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Marcos, A.P., Colón, J.Z., Gutiérrez, M.R. & Santos, A.M.P. (2014). Investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Elsevier España.
Macmillan, R. (2001). Violence and the life course: the consequences of victimization for personal and social development. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 1–22.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
McCosker, H., Barnard, A. & Gerber, R. (2001). Undertaking sensitive research: issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs of all participants. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1).
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Melrose, M. (2002). Labour pains: some considerations on the difficulties of researching juvenile prostitution. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(4), 333–351.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Newman, E. & Kaloupek, D.G. (2004). The risks and benefits of participating in trauma‐focused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 17(5), 383–394.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Newman, E., Walker, E.A. & Gefland, A. (1999). Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21(3), 187–196.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Oliffe, J.L., Kelly, M.T., Gonzalez Montaner, G. & Yu Ko, W.F. (2021). Zoom interviews: benefits and concessions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20,
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Ryan, L. & Golden, A. (2006). ‘Tick the box please’: a reflexive approach to doing quantitative social research. Sociology, 40(6), 1191–1200.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Rogers, W. & Meek, M. (2013). Rethinking the vulnerability of minority populations in research. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 2141–2146.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Ruzek, J.I. & Zatzick, D.F. (2000). Ethical considerations in research participation among acutely injured trauma survivors: an empirical investigation. General Hospital Psychiatry, 22(1), 27–36.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Sharkey, J.D., Reed, L.A. & Felix, E.D. (2017). Dating and sexual violence research in the schools: balancing protection of confidentiality with supporting the welfare of survivors. American journal of community psychology, 60(3–4), 361–367.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Shapland, J. & Hall, M. (2007). What do we know about the effects of crime on victims? International Review of Victimology, 14(2), 175–217.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Smith, J. & Noble, H. (2014). Bias in research. Evidence-based nursing, 17(4), 100–101.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Smith, K.V., Thew, G.R. & Graham, B. (2018). Conducting ethical internet-based research with vulnerable populations: a qualitative study of bereaved participants’ experiences of online questionnaires. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 9(1), 1–9.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Snyder, B.L. (2016). Women’s experience of being interviewed about abuse: a qualitative systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 23(9–10), 605–613.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. New York: Sage.
Stronach, I., Garratt, D., Pearce, C. & Piper, H. (2007). Reflexivity, the picturing of selves, the forging of method. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(2), 179–203.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Tonkiss, F. (2004). Using focus group. In C. Seale (ed.), Researching society and culture (pp. 193–206). London: Sage publications.
U.S. Department of health and human services (hhs) (1974) The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html (last accessed 10 January 2024).
United Nations (1985). Declaration of basic principles of justice for victims of crime and abuse of power. General Assembly resolution 40/34. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-basic-principles-justice-victims-crime-and-abuse#:~:text=%22Victims%22%20means%20persons%20who%2C,within%20Member%20States%2C%20including%20those (last accessed 10 January 2024).
Watson, A.H. (2022). Qualitative Interviewing during the covid-19 Pandemic Part 1: the literature on telephone interviews. Retrieved from https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/262157 (last accessed 10 January 2024).
Wellings, K., Branigan, P. & Mitchell, K. (2000). Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: using focus groups to research sensitive topics. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 2(3), 255–267.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Williamson, E., Gregory, A., Abrahams, H., Aghtaie, N., Walker, S.J. & Hester, M. (2020). Secondary trauma: emotional safety in sensitive research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(1), 55–70. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-019-09348-y
Wellings, K., Branigan, P. & Mitchell, K. (2000). Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: using focus groups to research sensitive topics. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 2(3), 255–267.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Williamson, E., Gregory, A., Abrahams, H., Aghtaie, N., Walker, S.J. & Hester, M. (2020). Secondary trauma: emotional safety in sensitive research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(1), 55–70. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-019-09348-y
Andriessen, K., Krysinska, K., Draper, B., Dudley, M. & Mitchell, P.B. (2018). Harmful or helpful? A systematic review of how those bereaved through suicide experience research participation. Crisis, 39(5), 364–376.
Angel, C. M., Sherman, L.W., Strang, H., Ariel, B., Bennett, S., Inkpen, N., Keane, A. & Richmond, T.S. (2014). Short-term effects of restorative justice conferences on post-traumatic stress symptoms among robbery and burglary victims: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 291–307.
Batchelor, D. (2023). Separating the ‘deed’ from the ‘done-to’: how communicating with the offender can change victims’ self-concept. Journal of interpersonal violence, 38(5–6), 4877–4905.
Bell, K. (2013). Participants’ motivations and co-construction of the qualitative research process. Qualitative Social Work, 12(4), 523–539.
Bolívar, D. (2019). Restoring harm: a psychosocial approach to victims and restorative justice. London: Routledge.
Buckle, J.L., Dwyer, S.C., and Jackson, M. (2010). Qualitative bereavement research: incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 111–125.
Campbell, R., Adams, A.E., Wasco, S.M., Ahrens, C.E. & Sefl, T. (2010). ‘What has it been like for you to talk with me today?’: The impact of participating in interview research on rape survivors. Violence against women, 16(1), 60–83.
Campbell, R. & Adams, A.E. (2009). Why do rape survivors volunteer for face-to-face interviews? A meta-study of victims’ reasons for and concerns about research participation. Journal of Interpersonal violence, 24(3), 395–405.
Choi, J.J., Green, D.L. & Kapp, S.A. (2010). Victimization, victims’ needs, and empowerment in victim offender mediation. International Review of Victimology, 17(3), 267–290.
Clark, J.J. & Walker, R. (2011). Research ethics in victimization studies: widening the lens. Violence against women, 17(12), 1489–1508.
Clark, T. (2008). ‘We’re over-researched here!’: exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology, 42(5), 953–970.
Clark, T. (2010). On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research, 10(4), 399–419.
Clark, T. (2011). Gaining and maintaining access: exploring the mechanisms that support and challenge the relationship between gatekeepers and researchers. Qualitative Social Work, 10(4), 485–502.
Cook, J.K. (2022). Shattered justice. Crime victims’ experiences with wrongful convictions and exonerations. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Cook, S.L., Swartout, K.M., Goodnight, B.L., Hipp, T.N. & Bellis, A.L. (2015). Impact of violence research on participants over time: helpful, harmful, or neither?. Psychology of violence, 5(3), 314–324.
Corbin, J. & Morse, J.M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative inquiry, 9(3), 335–354.
Crossley, M.L. (2000). Narrative psychology, trauma and the study of self/identity. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 527–546.
Delker, B.C., Salton, R. & McLean, K.C. (2020). Giving voice to silence: empowerment and disempowerment in the developmental shift from trauma ‘victim’ to ‘survivor-advocate’. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 21(2), 242–263.
Deming, R.S., Wolfe, J. & DeCourcey, D.D. (2021). Weighing distress and benefit: understanding the research participation experiences of bereaved parents of children with complex chronic conditions. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 62(1), 39–47.
Denzin, N.K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative inquiry, 23(1), 8–16.
DePrince, A.P. & Freyd, J.J. (2004). Costs and benefits of being asked about trauma history. Journal of Trauma Practice, 3(4), 23–35.
Dichter, M.E., Chatterjee, A., Protasiuk, E. & Newman, B.S. (2022). ‘I’d go from a mountain top and tell my story’: perspectives of survivors of intimate partner violence on storytelling for social change. Violence Against Women, 28(6–7), 1708–1720.
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E.L., Kippen, S. & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: what challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative research, 7(3), 327–353.
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E.L., Kippen, S. & Liamputtong, P. (2009). Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative research, 9(1), 61–79.
Disch, E. (2001). Research as clinical practice: creating a positive research experience for survivors of sexual abuse by professionals. Sociological Practice, 3(3), 221–239.
Doak, J. (2011). Honing the stone: refining restorative justice as a vehicle for emotional redress. Contemporary Justice Review, 14(4), 439–456.
East, L., Jackson, D., O’Brien, L. & Peters, K. (2010). Storytelling: an approach that can help to develop resilience. Nurse researcher, 17(3), 17–25.
Etherington, K. (2007). Working with traumatic stories: from transcriber to witness. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(2), 85–97.
Fernandez, M. (2010). Restorative justice for domestic violence victims: an integrated approach to their hunger for healing. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Fohring, S. (2020). The risks and rewards of researching victims of crime. Methodological Innovations, 13(2), 1–11
Frazier, P., Greer, C., Gabrielsen, S., Tennen, H., Park, C. & Tomich, P. (2013). The relation between trauma exposure and prosocial behavior. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 5(3), 286–294.
Gekoski, A., Gray, J.M. & Adler, J.R. (2012). Interviewing women bereaved by homicide: assessing the impact of trauma-focused research. Psychology, crime & law, 18(2), 177–189.
Goodrum, S. & Keys, J.L. (2007). Reflections on two studies of emotionally sensitive topics: bereavement from murder and abortion. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(4), 249–258.
Goodwin, J. & Tiderington, E. (2022). Building trauma-informed research competencies in social work education. Social Work Education, 41(2), 143–156.
Green, S. & Pemberton, A. (2018). The impact of crime: victimisation, harm and resilience. In S. Walklate (ed.), Handbook of victims and victimology (2nd ed.) (pp. 77–101). New York: Routledge.
Griffin, M.G., Resick, P.A., Waldrop, A.E., & Mechanic, M.B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: is there evidence of harm? Journal of traumatic stress, 16, 221–227.
Hamberger, L.K., Larsen, S. & Ambuel, B. (2020). ‘It helped a lot to go over it’: intimate partner violence research risks and benefits from participating in an 18-month longitudinal study. Journal of family violence, 35, 43–52.
Herman, J.L. (2005). Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women, 11(5), 571–602.
Hutchinson, S. & Wilson, H. (1994). Research and therapeutic interviews: a poststructuralist perspective. In J.M. Morse (ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (p. 300–315). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jaffe, A.E., DiLillo, D., Hoffman, L., Haikalis, M. & Dykstra, R.E. (2015). Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research. Clinical Psychology Review, 40(2015), 40–56.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions. Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: The Free Press.
Josselson, R. (2007). The ethical attitude in narrative research. In D.J. Clandinin (ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: mapping a methodology (pp. 537–566). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kay, J.W. (2006). Murder victims’ families for reconciliation: story-telling for healing, as witness, and in public policy. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (eds.), Handbook of restorative justice: a global perspective (pp. 230–245). New York: Routledge.
Kelly, Jr, V.C. (2014). Interpersonal caring, social discipline and a blueprint for restorative healing. In V.C. Kelly, Jr. & M. Thorsborne (eds.), The psychology of emotion in restorative practice (pp.54–82). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Kirkner, A., Relyea, M. & Ullman, S.E. (2019). Predicting the effects of sexual assault research participation: reactions, perceived insight, and help-seeking. Journal of interpersonal violence, 34(17), 3592–3613.
Latimer, J., Dowden, C. & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: a meta-analysis. The prison journal, 85(2), 127–144.
Liebling, A., McNeill, F. & Schmidt, B.E. (2017). Criminological engagements. In A. Liebling, S. Maruna & L. McAra (eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (6th ed.) (pp. 990–1009). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McGlynn, C., Westmarland, N. & Godden, N. (2012). ‘I just wanted him to hear me’: sexual violence and the possibilities of restorative justice. Journal of Law and Society, 39(2), 213–240.
Maguire, M. & McVie, S. (2017). Crime data and criminal statistics: a critical reflection. In A. Liebling, S. Maruna & L. McAra (eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (6th ed.) (pp.163–189). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, S.L. (2011). After the crime: the power of restorative justice dialogues between victims and violent offenders. New York: New York University Press.
Miller, S.L. (2018). Journeys: resilience and growth for survivors of intimate partner abuse. Oakland: University of California Press.
Moran, R.J. & Asquith, N. L. (2020). Understanding the vicarious trauma and emotional labour of criminological research. Methodological Innovations, 13(2), 1–11.
Newman, E. & Kaloupek, D. (2009). Overview of research addressing ethical dimensions of participation in traumatic stress studies: autonomy and beneficence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(6), 595–602.
Newman, E. & Kaloupek, D.G. (2004). The risks and benefits of participating in trauma‐focused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(5), 383–394.
Nielsen, L.H., Hansen, M., Elklit, A. & Bramsen, R.H. (2016). Sexual assault victims participating in research: causing harm when trying to help? Archives of psychiatric nursing, 30(3), 412–417.
Opsal, T., Wolgemuth, J., Cross, J., Kaanta, T., Dickmann, E., Colomer, S. & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2016). ‘There are no known benefits...’: considering the risk/benefit ratio of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1137–1150.
Park, C.L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological bulletin, 136(2), 257–301.
Park, C.L. & Blumberg, C.J. (2002). Disclosing trauma through writing: testing the meaning-making hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(5), 597–616.
Pemberton, A., Aarten, P.G. & Mulder, E. (2019). Stories as property: narrative ownership as a key concept in victims’ experiences with criminal justice. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 19(4), 404–420.
Pennebaker, J.W. & Seagal, J.D. (1999). Forming a story: the health benefits of narrative. Journal of clinical psychology, 55(10), 1243–1254.
Poulson, B. (2003). A third voice: a review of empirical research on the psychological outcomes of restorative justice. Utah Law Review, 15(1), 167–203.
Poupart, J. (1997). L’entretien de type qualitatif: considérations épistémologiques, théoriques et méthodologiques. In J. Poupart, J-P. Deslauriers, L-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer and A.P. Pires (eds.), La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques (pp.173–209). Montréal: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur.
Rosenblatt, F.F., Mello, M.M.P., & Medeiros, C.S.L.Q de. (2023). Secondary victimisation, procedural injustices, and machismo: the experiences of women who access Brazil’s not-so-specialised domestic violence courts. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 47(2), 167–184.
Rosenthal, G. (2003). The healing effects of storytelling: on the conditions of curative storytelling in the context of research and counseling. Qualitative inquiry, 9(6), 915–933.
Rossetto, K.R. (2014). Qualitative research interviews: assessing the therapeutic value and challenges. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(4), 482–489.
Rossner, M. (2018). Restorative justice and victims of crime: directions and developments. In S. Walklate (ed.), Handbook of victims and victimology (2^nd ed.) (pp. 229–246). New York: Routledge.
Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Colledge, E., Dignan, J., Howes, M., Johnstone, J., Robinson, G. & Sorsby, A. (2006). Situating restorative justice within criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), 505–532.
Shapland, J., Robinson, G. & Sorsby, A. (2011). Restorative justice in practice: evaluating what works for victims and offenders. London: Routledge.
Sherman, L.W., Strang, H., Angel, C., Woods, D., Barnes, G.C., Bennett, S. & Inkpen, N. (2005). Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 367–395.
Singer, J.A. (2004). Narrative identity and meaning making across the adult lifespan: an introduction. Journal of Personality, 72(3), 437–460.
Stanfield II, J.H. (2006). The possible restorative justice functions of qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 723–727.
Strang, H. (2002). Repair or revenge: victims and restorative justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Strang, H., Sherman, L., Angel, C.M., Woods, D.J., Bennett, S., Newbury‐Birch, D. & Inkpen, N. (2006). Victim evaluations of face‐to‐face restorative justice conferences: a quasi‐experimental analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 281–306.
Van Camp, T. (2014). Victims of violence and restorative practices: finding a voice. London: Routledge.
Van Camp, T. (2017). Understanding victim participation in restorative practices: looking for justice for oneself as well as for others. European Journal of Criminology, 14(6), 679–696.
Van Camp, T. & Wemmers, J.A. (2013). Victim satisfaction with restorative justice: more than simply procedural justice. International Review of Victimology, 19(2), 117–143.
Van Camp, T. & Wemmers, J.A. (2016). Victims’ reflections on the protective and proactive approaches to the offer of restorative justice: the importance of information. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 58(3), 415–442.
van Hoek, A. & Wolthuis, A. (2020). Story telling by victims and offenders: a tool for personal and social change. Experiences from the Netherlands, Belgium and Rwanda. In G. Varona Martínez (ed.), Arte en prisión: justicia restaurativa a través de proyectos artísticos y narrativos (pp. 89–113). Valencia: tirant lo blanch.
Vollhardt, J.R. & Staub, E. (2011). Inclusive altruism born of suffering: the relationship between adversity and prosocial attitudes and behavior toward disadvantaged outgroups. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(3), 307–315.
Walker, E.A., Newman, E., Koss, M. & Bernstein, D. (1997). Does the study of victimization revictimize the victims? General Hospital Psychiatry, 19(6), 403–410.
Walklate, S. (2018). Conclusion: developing an agenda for a (critical) victimology. In S. Walklate (ed.), Handbook of victims and victimology (2^nd ed.) (pp. 379–384). New York: Routledge.
Wemmers, J.A. & Cyr, K. (2005). Can mediation be therapeutic for crime victims? An evaluation of victims’ experiences in mediation with young offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 47(3), 527–544.
Widom, C.S. & Czaja, S.J. (2005). Reactions to research participation in vulnerable subgroups. Accountability in Research, 12(2), 115–138.
Adams, T.E., Jones, S.H., Jones, L.H. & Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cowburn, M., Gelsthorpe, L. & Wahidin, A. (2017). Research ethics in criminology: dilemmas, issues and solutions. Abingdon: Routledge.
Cowburn, M. & Wahidin, A. (2021). Ethics and criminology and criminal justice: from conceptualizing to conduct. In J.C. Barnes & D.R. Forde (eds.) The encyclopedia of research methods in criminology and criminal justice (pp. 190–194). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell
Israel, M. & Hay, I. (2012). Research ethics in criminology. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt & S.F. Messner (eds.) The SAGE handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 500–515). London: Sage.
Johnstone, G. (2017). Restorative justice for victims: inherent limits? Restorative Justice: an International Journal, 5 (3), 382–395.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
Kraska, P.B., Brent, J.J. & Neuman, W.L. (2021). The ethics of crime and justice research. Abingdon: Routledge.
Rosenblatt, F.F. (2015). The role of community in restorative justice. Abingdon: Routledge.
Strang, H. & Sherman, L. (2015). The morality of evidence: the second annual lecture for Restorative Justice: an International Journal. Restorative Justice: an International Journal, 3(1), 6–27.
- Crossref
- 导出引用
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime – unodc (2020). Restorative Justice. Decade of Action. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/justice-and-prison-reform/cpcj-restorative-justice.html (last accessed 16 June 2022).