EUR  â¬187.20EUR  â¬156.00 excl. VAT
Theodotionâs Greek Text of Daniel
An Analysis of the Revisional Process and Its Semitic Source
Series:
Author:
This study advances our knowledge regarding the character of the version of Daniel attributed to Theodotion within the larger framework of the Theodotionic problem in Septuagint research. This is achieved in two ways. In addition to demonstrating the recensional character of Theodotion-Daniel and describing its revising techniques, it also breaks new ground on Theodotionâs Hebrew-Aramaic source. The findings compellingly argue for the theory that Theodotion-Daniel is a systematic revision of the Old Greek in conformity with a Semitic text form which often preserved original readings against the Masoretic Text and the Qumran scrolls.
Daniel Olariu, Ph.D. (2021), Hebrew University of Jerusalem, is teaching Biblical Studies at Theologische Hochschule Friedensau, Germany. He is the recipient of distinguished scholarships, awards, and prizes. He has presented papers at various international conferences and published many articles on the Book of Daniel.
Abbreviations
Terms and Sigla Employed in the Discussion
Remarks on Form and Style
1 Introduction
â1âState of Research on the Theodotionic Problem
â2âThe Purpose and Importance of the Present Study
â3âMethodology
â4âTools
â5âTrajectory of the Study
2 The Character of a Revision
â1âPrevious Recensional Studies
â2âRecensional Techniques
3 The Characterization of the Revisional Process in Th-Daniel 1â12
âAâRecensional Consistency
âBâRecensional Techniques
âCâRecensional Inconsistencies
âDâEvaluation
4 The Nature of Th-Danâs Vorlage
â1âMinuses in Th-Dan
â2âPluses in Th-Dan
â3âDifferences in Words
â4âEvaluation
5 Summary of Results and Conclusions
â1âRecensional Character of Th-Dan
â2âInsights on Th-Danâs Vorlage
â3âHistorical Aspects of Th-Danâs Revision
Appendix 1: Proto-Th and Th-Dan: A Comparative Synopsys
Appendix 2: Samples of Inner-Greek Corruptions in Th-Dan
Appendix 3: The Distribution of the Dialogic Formula ×¢× × â¦ ×××ר/×¢× × â¦ ×××ר×× in MT-Dan
Appendix 4: The Distribution of the Phrase ××ר×× ××× âThese Menâ in MT-Dan
Bibliography
Index of Modern Authors
Index of Ancient Texts
Terms and Sigla Employed in the Discussion
Remarks on Form and Style
1 Introduction
â1âState of Research on the Theodotionic Problem
â2âThe Purpose and Importance of the Present Study
â3âMethodology
â4âTools
â5âTrajectory of the Study
2 The Character of a Revision
â1âPrevious Recensional Studies
â2âRecensional Techniques
3 The Characterization of the Revisional Process in Th-Daniel 1â12
âAâRecensional Consistency
âBâRecensional Techniques
âCâRecensional Inconsistencies
âDâEvaluation
4 The Nature of Th-Danâs Vorlage
â1âMinuses in Th-Dan
â2âPluses in Th-Dan
â3âDifferences in Words
â4âEvaluation
5 Summary of Results and Conclusions
â1âRecensional Character of Th-Dan
â2âInsights on Th-Danâs Vorlage
â3âHistorical Aspects of Th-Danâs Revision
Appendix 1: Proto-Th and Th-Dan: A Comparative Synopsys
Appendix 2: Samples of Inner-Greek Corruptions in Th-Dan
Appendix 3: The Distribution of the Dialogic Formula ×¢× × â¦ ×××ר/×¢× × â¦ ×××ר×× in MT-Dan
Appendix 4: The Distribution of the Phrase ××ר×× ××× âThese Menâ in MT-Dan
Bibliography
Index of Modern Authors
Index of Ancient Texts
Institutes, seminaries, libraries, specialists, graduate and post-graduate students interested in Textual Studies, Septuagint, Qumran Scrolls, Book of Daniel, translation studies, translation/revising techniques.