In The Authority of Law in the Hebrew Bible and Early Judaism, Vroom identifies a development in the authority of written law that took place in early Judaism. Ever since Assyriologists began to recognize that the Mesopotamian law collections did not function as law codes do todayâas a source of binding obligationâscholars have grappled with the question of when the Pentateuchal legal corpora came to be treated as legally binding. Vroom draws from legal theory to provide a theoretical framework for understanding the nature of legal authority, and develops a methodology for identifying instances in which legal texts were treated as binding law by ancient interpreters. This method is applied to a selection of legal-interpretive texts: Ezra-Nehemiah, Temple Scroll, the Qumran rule texts, and the Samaritan Pentateuch.
Jonathan Vroom, Ph.D. (2017) University of Toronto, is a Sessional Lecturer and Writing Instructor at the University of Toronto. He has published on Pentateuchal criticism and textual criticism in journals such as the Journal of Biblical Literature.
Acknowledgements Abbreviations
Introduction
â1âLegal Obligation and the Ancient Near Eastern Law âCodesâ
â2âInterpretation as the Key to Identifying Legal Obligation
â3âLegal Theory and the Problem of Conceptual Anachronism
â4âOverview of Chapters
PART 1: Theory and Method
1 Identifying Legal Obligation in Interpretive Sources
â1âLegal Obligation and the Nature of Lawâs Authority
â2âThe Rule of Law and Legal Interpretation
â3âSabbath Interpretation as a Test Case
â4âConclusion
2 History of Research and the Need for a Legal-Theoretical Approach
â1âArguments for the Non-Binding Character of Ancient Near Eastern Law
â2âHistory of Scholarship and Conflicting Assumptions about Law
â3âConclusion
3 Authority and Problem of Interpretation
â1âDefining Interpretation, Authority, and Scripture
â2âAuthority and the Problem of Interpretation
â3âAuthority Transfer and the Limits of Interpretation in Modern Law
â4âAuthority and Interpretation in Ancient Israel and Early Judaism
â5âInterpretive Methods and Motives
â6âConclusion
PART 2: Textual Analysis
4 Legal Interpretation in the Temple Scrollâs Yom Kippur Law
â1âAn Overview of the Temple Scroll
â2âThe Text of Temple Scroll 25:10â27:10
â3âThreats to the Rule of Law addressed in Temple Scrollâs Interpretive Rewriting
â4âConclusion
5 Legal Innovation in the Samaritan Pentateuchâs Covenant Code
â1âThe Provenance of the Samaritan Pentateuchâs Legal Innovations
â2âCorrecting Threats to the Rule of Law in the Samaritan Pentateuch
â3âFurther Considerations
â4âConclusion
6 Legal Rewriting in the Qumran Penal Codes
â1âThe Literary Relationship among the Rule Texts and the Problem of Their Genre
â2âInterpretive Rewriting in the Penal Codes
â3âThe Genre of the Penal Codes and Historical Reconstruction
â4âConclusion
7 The Authority of the Torah in the Ezra-Nehemiah Legal Narratives
â1âPreliminary Issue: Ezraâs Torah and Pentateuchal Law
â2âCommunity Response as Reflecting a Binding Attitude toward Law
â3âThe Authority of the Torah versus Torah Experts in Yehud
â4âConclusion
Conclusion 202
â1âSummary of Theory and Method
â2âSummary of Textual Analysis
â3âBetween Authority and Interpretation in Ancient Law
â4âMapping the Emergence of Legal Obligation in Early Judaism
â5âLooking Ahead
All interested in ancient Near Eastern law, history of legal thought, Pentateuchal law, the Torah in the Persian period, the Qumran rule texts, Temple Scroll, and the Samaritan Pentateuch