Acknowledgements
The author and editors wish to acknowledge the kind permission of the relevant publishers to reprint the chapters collected in this volume:
-
Review of H. Hettrich, Kontext und Aspekt in der altgriechischen Prosa Herodots, in Lingua 48 (1979) 223–257
-
‘The Greek Perfect: Subject versus Object’, translated by A. Rijksbaron from ‘Het Griekse perfectum: subject contra object’, Lampas 17 (1984) 403–420
-
‘The Discourse Function of the Imperfect’, in A. Rijksbaron, H.A. Mulder, G.C. Wakker (eds), In the Footsteps of Raphael Kühner: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in Commemoration of the 150th Anniversary of the Publication of Raphael Kühner’s Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, II. Theil: Syntaxe (Amsterdam: Gieben, 1988) 237–254
-
‘Sur les emplois de λέγε et εἰπέ chez Platon’, in B. Jacquinod et J. Lallot (eds), Études sur l’ aspect verbal chez Platon (Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’ Université, 2000) 151–170
-
‘On False Historic Presents in Sophocles (and Euripides)’, in I.J.F. de Jong, A. Rijksbaron (eds), Sophocles and the Greek Language (Leiden: Brill, 2006) 127–149
-
‘ἀκροᾶσθαι or ἀκροάσασθαι? (Plato Ion 530d9)’, Appendix III in Plato: Ion. Or: On the Iliad, edited with introduction and commentary (Leiden: Brill, 2007) 261–269
-
‘The Imperfect as the Tense of Substitutionary Perception’, in P. da Cunha Corrêa, M. Martinho, A. Pinheiro Hasegawa (eds), Hyperboreans: Essays in Greek and Latin Poetry, Philosophy, Rhetoric and Linguistics (São Paulo: Humanitas, 2012) 331–377
-
‘How Does a Messenger Begin His Speech? Some Observations on the Opening Lines of Euripidean Messenger Speeches’, in J.M. Bremer, S.L. Radt, C.J. Ruijgh (eds), Miscellanea tragica in honorem J.C. Kamerbeek (Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1976) 293–309
-
‘Discourse Cohesion in the Proem of Hesiod’s Theogony’, in S.J. Bakker, G.C. Wakker (eds), Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek (Leiden: Brill, 2009) 241–267
-
‘On the Syntax and Semantics of inquit Formulae in Plato’s Narrated Dialogues’, in J. de la Villa Polo et al. (eds), Ianua Classicorum: Temas y formas del Mundo Clásico, vol. 1 (Madrid: Sociedad Española de Estudios Clásicos, 2015) 397–410
-
‘Sur quelques différences entre οὗτος ὁ + substantif, οὗτος δὲ ὁ + substantif et ὁ δὲ + substantif + οὗτος chez Hérodote’, Lalies 12 (1993) 119–130
-
‘Sur les emplois de ἐάν et ἐπεάν’, Lalies 12 (1993) 131–144
-
‘The Syntax and Semantics of Expressions of Sorrow and Related Concepts in Homer’, adapted by A. Rijksbaron from ‘D’ où viennent les ἄλγεα? Quelques observations à propos d’ ἄλγε᾽ ἔχειν chez Homère’, in F. Létoublon (ed.), La langue et les textes en grec ancien: Actes du Colloque P. Chantraine, Grenoble, 5–8 septembre 1989 (Amsterdam: Gieben, 1991) 181–193, and from ‘Further Observations on Expressions of Sorrow and Related Expressions in Homer’, in E. Banfi (ed.), Atti del Secondo Incontro internazionale di Linguistica greca (Trento: Editrice Universita degli Studi, 1997) 215–224
-
‘The Meaning and Word Class of πρότερον and τὸ πρότερον’ in E. Crespo et al. (eds), Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek (Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, 2006) 405–441
-
‘Sur l’ article avec nom propre’, in J.-L. Breuil et al. (eds), Ἐν κοινωνίᾳ πᾶσα φιλία: Mélanges pour Bernard Jacquinod (Saint-Etienne: Presses universitaires, 2006) 243–257
-
‘Does Ancient Greek Have a Word for ‘No’? The Evidence from οὐκοῦν … οὐ Questions’, Journal of Greek Linguistics 12 (2012) 140–160
-
‘The Treatment of the Greek Middle Coice by the Ancient Grammarians’, in H. Joly (ed.), Actes du Colloque International ‘Philosophies du langage et théories linguistiques dans l’ Antiquité’, Grenoble 1985 (Bruxelles: Editions Ousia-Université des Sciences Sociales de Grenoble, 1986) 427–444
-
‘A Question of Questions: peusis, erôtêsis and [Longinus] Περὶ ὕψους 18.1’ Mnemosyne 56 (2003) 733–736
-
‘The Xenophon Factory: One Hundred and Fifty Years of School Editions of Xenophon’s Anabasis’, in R. Gibson, C.S. Kraus (eds), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory (Leiden: Brill, 2002) 235–267