Animal welfare labelling: is the market the right governance structure to meet peopleâs moral concerns?

F. Pirscher

Animal welfare labelling: is the market the right governance structure to meet peopleâs moral concerns?

In: The ethics of consumption

Author:

F. Pirscher

F. Pirscher Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099 Halle, Germany; frauke.pirscher@landw.uni-halle.de

Search for other papers by F. Pirscher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

Type:: Chapter

Pages:: 120â125

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086867844_021

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

â¬42.00â¬35.00Â excl. VAT

Add to Cart

Redeem Access Token

The introduction of an animal welfare label is intensively discussed in Europe. The political debate is dominated by the technical question how to develop the label, while the fundamental question whether a market based approach is the right governance structure to deal with public moral concerns is nearly neglected. However, the decision to turn states of different animal welfare level via labelling into a process quality of meat is based on normative assumptions that are not without controversy. Following the school of social constructivism one can assume value articulating institutions as a social construct that determines what kind of values can be expressed and also influences the formation of values. Markets as institutional settings imply assumptions on the understanding of rationality, preferences formation and making choices. Therefore, it is the aim of this paper to disclose the normative implications associated with commodifying moral concerns regarding animal welfare and to induce a discussion whether markets are the appropriate institutional frame for animal welfare problems. The paper focusâ on the following questions: Whoâs moral concerns can be articulated and whoâs are excluded on a market? What kind of ethical value system regarding animal welfare is implicitly assumed by a market approach? What does the interpretation of moral concerns as individual preference for process quality imply for dealing with ethical conflicts? It can be shown that only the moral concerns of compassionate carnivore consumers are taken into consideration. This group must also have a utilitarian belief systems that allows for trade-offs between animal well-being and other material goods. Deontological systems are not compatible with the assumptions of neoclassical economics. Lexicographical ordering of preferences is here not assumed as rational. Finally, by interpreting animal suffering as a problem of market failure, the normative discussion of how should we deal with animals is reduced to a technical question of making individual preferences explicit. Preferences themselves are not under discussion.

Citation Info

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share link with colleague or librarian

You can email a link to this page to a colleague or librarian:
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789086867844/BP000021.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

Collapse
Expand

The ethics of consumption

The citizen, the market, and the law

E-Book ISBN:: 9789086867844

Publisher:: Wageningen Academic

Print Publication Date:: 01 Nov 2013

Subjects
- Life Sciences

Metrics

	All Time	Past 365 days	Past 30 Days
Abstract Views	128	38	6
Full Text Views	7	1	0
PDF Views & Downloads	5	1	0

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

Authors

Open Access

Product Information

Company

Contact

Animal welfare labelling: is the market the right governance structure to meet peopleâs moral concerns?

Citation Info

Share link with colleague or librarian

The ethics of consumption

The citizen, the market, and the law

Table of Contents

Metrics

Metrics

Animal welfare labelling: is the market the right governance structure to meet peopleâs moral concerns?