Kapitel 1 Natur und Geist
in Hegels dialektischer NaturalismusSearch for other papers by Morteza Fakharian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Guided by the dialectical concept of “second nature,” which I develop in this work, I will offer a form of conceptual clarification in the first chapter. In a Hegelian model, concepts are not to be considered in isolation. What they are, they are only in relation to one another. Thus, according to this foundational framework, one can only properly grasp concepts like nature and spirit by understanding them relationally. While this relational approach is valid, it risks giving the misleading impression that nature and spirit relate to one another merely externally. Such a relationship would then stem from an external reflection, a description from an outside perspective. Only by recognizing a mutuality between nature and spirit can the relationality be truly understood – the kind I term dialectical relationality. The distinction between these two forms of relationality systematically aligns with the difference between finite and infinite spirit. Consequently, I propose reinterpreting the nature‐spirit constellation not as a dichotomy but as a triad: nature‐finite spirit‐infinite spirit. Even here, the definitions and their interrelations are explained through relationality, meaning that the infinite spirit functions as such in relation to another position, namely that of the finite spirit. Therefore, in this chapter, I will examine not only the concept of nature but also those of finite and infinite spirit.