Beck, U. (2002). The cosmopolitan society and its enemies. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(1–2), 17–44.
Beck, U. (2003). Toward a New Critical Theory with a Cosmopolitan Intent. Constellations, 10(4), 453–468.
Beck, U. (2004), Cosmopolitical Realism: On the Distinction between Cosmopolitanism in Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Global Networks, 4: 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00084.x
Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan Vision. Polity.
Beck, U. (2008). Weltrisikogesellschaft: Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit. Suhrkamp.
Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: A research agenda. British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 1–23.
Boccagni, P. (2012). Rethinking transnational studies: Transnational ties and the transnationalism of everyday life. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011423600
Boczkowski, P. J., & Siles, I. (2014). Steps toward cosmopolitanism in the study of media technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(5), 560–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.808358
boyd, danah, & Crawford, K. (2012). CRITICAL QUESTIONSFORBIGDATA: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Cinnamon, J. (2020). Attack the Data: Agency, Power, and Technopolitics in South African Data Activism. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(3), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1644991
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2020). The costs of connection: How data are colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Oxford University Press.
Data Donations, Welcome at Europe’s Data Donation Infrastructure. (n.d.). Data Donation EU. Retrieved April 24, 2024, from https://datadonation.eu
Delanty, G. (2006). The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 25–47.
Delanty, G., & Harris, N. (2018). The idea of critical cosmopolitanism. In G. Delanty (Ed.), Routledge International Handbook of Cosmopolitanism Studies (2nd ed., pp. 10–25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351028905
Dieter (2010): The making of a comprehensive transnational discourse community, In M.L. Djelic, Marie-Laure & S. Quack (Eds.), Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance (pp. 305–326). Cambridge University Press.
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2023). Data Feminism. The MIT Press.
Dukalskis, A., Furstenberg, S., Gorokhovskaia, Y., Heathershaw, J., Lemon, E., & Schenkkan, N. (2022). Transnational repression: data advances, comparisons, and challenges. Political Research Exchange, 4(1).
Hall, Oliver 2018. “The Internet and Cosmopolitanism.” In Routledge International Handbook of Cosmopolitanism Studies, 406–18. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351028905-36.
Hepp, A., Loosen, W., Dreyer, S., Jarke, J., Kannengießer, S., Katzenbach, C., Malaka, R., Pfadenhauer, M., Puschmann, C., & Schulz, W. (2023). ChatGPT, LaMDA, and the hype around communicative AI: The automation of communication as a field of research in media and communication studies. Human-Machine Communication, 6, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.6.4
Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739
Morales, E., & Reilly, K. (2023). The unhomed data subject: negotiating datafication in Latin America. Information, Communication & Society, 26(12), 2457–2471. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2250436
Moats, D., & Seaver, N. (2019). “You Social Scientists Love Mind Games”: Experimenting in the “divide” between data science and critical algorithm studies. Big Data & Society, 6(1). https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1177/2053951719833404
Nguyen, D. (2017): Europe, the Crisis, and the Internet. A Web Sphere Analysis. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Nguyen, D. (2020). Media and Communication Studies in the Age of Digitalization and Datafication: How Practical Factors and Research Interests Determine Methodological Choices. In Understanding Media and Society in the Age of Digitalisation Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38577-4_2
Nguyen, D., & Hekman, E. (2022). A ‘New Arms Race’? Framing China and the U.S.A. in A.I. News Reporting: A Comparative Analysis of the Washington Post and South China Morning Post. Global Media and China, 7(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364221078626
Nguyen, D., & Nguyen, S. (2022). Data Literacy as an Emerging Challenge in the Migration/Refugee Context: A Critical Exploration of Communication Efforts Around “Refugee Apps”. International Journal of Communication, 16, 5553–5557. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17406
Nguyen, D., Wang, B., & Mutsvairo, B. (2024). (Pragmatic) collaboration for progress or threat to autonomy? African news discourses about Chinese technology in Nigeria and Ghana. Global Media and China, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364241232757
Rieder, G., & Simon, J. (2016). Datatrust: Or, the political quest for numerical evidence and the epistemologies of Big Data. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716649398
Tacheva, Z. (2022). Taking a critical look at the critical turn in data science: From “data feminism” to transnational feminist data science. Big Data & Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221112901
Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335
Wagner, K. B. (2023). TikTok and its mediatic split: the promotion of ecumenical user-generated content alongside Sinocentric media globalization. Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221136006
Zhu, Y. (2024). Privacy cynicism and diminishing utility of state surveillance: A natural experiment of mandatory location disclosure on China’s Weibo. Big Data & Society, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241242450
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books.
Ács, Z. J., Lafuente, E., & Szerb, L. (2022). A note on the configuration of the digital ecosystem in Latin America. Tec Empresarial, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18845/te.v16i1.5926
Alam, S. (2008). Majority world: Challenging the West’s rhetoric of democracy. Amerasia Journal, 34(1), 88–98.
Alatas, S. H. (1969). Academic imperialism. Lecture delivered to the History Society, University of Singapore.
Alatas, S. H. (2000). Intellectual imperialism: Definition, traits, and problems. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 28(1), 23–45.
Alatas, S. F. (2013). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences. Current Sociology, 51(6), 599–613.
Albagli, S., & Rocha, L. (2020). Citizen Science on the solid waste issue. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, 30(4), 1–31.
Albuquerque, A. de. (2021). The institutional basis of anglophone western centrality. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1).
Albuquerque, A. (2023). Towards a multipolar communication international scholarship? World of Media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 1(1), 5–18. doi:
Albuquerque, A. (2023). Towards a multipolar communication international scholarship? World of Media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 1(1), 5–18. doi: 10.30547/worldofmedia.1.2023.1)| false
Albuquerque, A., de Oliveira, T. M., dos Santos Junior, M. A., & de Albuquerque, S. O. F. (2020). Structural limits to the de-westernization of the communication field: The editorial board in Clarivate’s JCR system. Communication, Culture & Critique, 13(2), 185–203.
Alperin, Juan Pablo. The public impact of Latin America’s approach to open access. Stanford University, 2015.
American Society for Cell Biology. (2012). San Francisco declaration on research assessment (DORA).
Amiel, S.A., Potts, L., Goldsmith, K. et al. A parallel randomised controlled trial of the Hypoglycaemia Awareness Restoration Programme for adults with type 1 diabetes and problematic hypoglycaemia despite optimised self-care (HARPdoc). Nat Commun 13, 2229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29488
Amiel, T., Saraiva, F., Cruz, L. R. D., & Gonsales, P. (2023). Mapping surveillance capitalism in south american higher education. Latin American Journal of Educational Technology – RELATEC, 22 (1), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.22.1.221
Antón-Sancho, Á., Vergara, D., Sánchez-Calvo, M., & Fernández-Arias, P. (2023). On the influence of the university tenure on the digital pandemic stress in higher education faculty. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040335
Arocena, R. and Sutz, J. (2005). Latin American universities: From an original revolution to an uncertain transition. Higher Education, 50(4), 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6367-8
Barbudo, Carlos (2020). Hacia una privacidad colectiva: repensar las bases teóricas de la distinción público/privado en la economía de la vigilancia. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 17(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.66844.
Becerra, M. and Waisbord, S. (2021). The curious absence of cybernationalism in Latin America: Lessons for the study of digital sovereignty and governance. Communication and the Public, 6(1–4), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473211046730
Beigel, F. (Ed.). (2016). The politics of academic autonomy in Latin America. Routledge.
Bellanger, Pierre. De la souveraineté en général et de la souveraineté numérique en particulier. Les Echos, v. 30, 2011.
Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. 1999. On the cunning of imperialist reason. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(1), 41–58.
Boussebaa, M. and Tienari, J. (2019). Englishization and the politics of knowledge production in management studies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492619835314
Carlsson, U. (2003). The rise and fall of NWICO. Nordicom Review 24(2), 31–67.
Carvalho, G. (2022). The World Bank and healthcare reforms: A cross‐national analysis of policy prescriptions in South America. Social Inclusion, 10(1), 5–18.
Castro G., Angela Maria. Cidadania e direitos do trabalho. Zahar, 2002.
Ceballos, L. D., Maisonnave, M. A., & Londoño, C. R. B. (2020). Soberanía tecnológica digital en Latinoamérica. Propuestas para el Desarrollo, (IV), 151–167.
Chukwuemeka, E., Chekwubechukwu, O., & Obuteaku, N. (2018). The contributions of impact factor publication policy to academic development in nigerian higher institutions of learning: a critical evaluation. International Journal of Research -Granthaalayah, 6(11), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i11.2018.1143
Clinio, A. (2019). Ciência aberta na América Latina: duas perspectivas em disputa. Transinformação, 31, e190028.
Cong, W., & Thumfart, J. (2022). A Chinese precursor to the digital sovereignty debate: Digital anti-colonialism and authoritarianism from the Post–Cold War era to the Tunis Agenda. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac059.
Couture, S., & Toupin, S. (2019). What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital? New Media & Society, 21(10), 2305–2322.
Demeter, M. (2020). Academic knowledge production and the Global South. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (2002). The internationalization of palace wars: Lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Dorfman, A., & Mattelart, A. (1971). Para leer al Pato Donald [How to Read Donald Duck]. Valparaíso: Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso.
Dudin, M. N., Shkodinsky, S. I., & Usmanov, D. I. (2021). Digital Sovereignty of Russia: Barriers and New Development Tracks. Market Economy Problems, 2, 30–49.
Floridi, L. (2020). The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6.
Freije, V. (2019). The ‘emancipation of media’: Latin American advocacy for a New International Information Order in the 1970s. Journal of Global History, 14(2), 301–320.
Gábriš, T., & Hamuľák, O. (2023). Digital sovereignty or sovereignty with digital elements? In D. R. Troitiño, T. Kerikmäe, & O. Hamuľák (Eds.), Digital Development of the European Union (pp. 249–263). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27312-4_16.
George Mwangi, C.A., Yao, C.W. (2021). US Higher Education Internationalization Through an Equity-Driven Lens. In: Perna, L.W. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44007-7_11.
Golubev, A. (2021). Digitizing archives in Russia: Epistemic sovereignty and its challenges in the digital age. In The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies (pp. 353–372). Palgrave-Macmillan.
González, J. T. G., Estrada, M. S., & Pargman, T. C. (2022). Construyendo soberanía digital en América Latina: un análisis de las iniciativas de cuatro colectivos sociales. Chasqui: Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, (149), 227–242.
Gonzalo, T. Á. L. (2017). Despliegue de una Red Inalámbrica Libre Comunitaria: un ejercicio de soberanía digital en el barrio Villa del Río (Bogotá, Colombia). Hamut’ay, 4(2), 80–91.
Goyanes, M. (2020). Editorial boards in communication sciences journals: Plurality or standardization? International Communication Gazette, 82(4), 342–364.
Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2020). How the geographic diversity of editorial boards affects what is published in JCR-ranked communication journals. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1123–1148.
Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2017). Tendencias globales en educación superior y su impacto en América Latina: Desafíos pendientes. Lenguas Modernas, 50(50), 15–32.
Hayler, T. (1971). Aid as imperialism. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.
Jelinek, T. (2023). The digital sovereignty trap: Avoiding the return of silos and a divided world. SpringerBriefs in International Relations. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8414-3.
Kaloudis, M. (2021). Sovereignty in the digital age – How can we measure digital sovereignty and support the EU’s Action Plan? New Global Studies, 16(3), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2021-0015.
Katz, R. and Callorda, F. (2018). Accelerating the development of Latin American digital ecosystem and implications for broadband policy. Telecommunications Policy, 42(9), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.11.002
Kettell, S. and Sutton, A. (2013). New imperialism: toward a holistic approach. International Studies Review, 15(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12033
Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: The Free Press.
Litfin, Karen T. Constructing environmental security and ecological interdependence. Global Governance, v. 5, p. 359, 1999.
Lugo-Ocando, J. (2018). A mouthpiece for truth: Foreign aid for media development and the making of journalism in the global south. Brazilian Journalism Research, 14(2), 412–431.
Martin, C. (2022). Geopolitics and digital sovereignty. In H. Werthner, E. Prem, E. A. Lee, & C. Ghezzi (Eds.), Perspectives on Digital Humanism (pp. 227–231). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86144-5_30.
Meijas, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2019). Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). doi:
Mugnaini, R., Damaceno, R. J. P., Digiampietri, L. A., & Mena-Chalco, J. P. (2019). Panorama da produção científi ca do Brasil além da indexação: uma análise exploratória da comunicação em periódicos. Transinformação, 31, e190033.
Nye J. R., Joseph S. The changing nature of world power. Political science quarterly, v. 105, n. 2, p. 177–192, 1990. 108, 145–155.
Oliveira, T., Araujo, R. F., Cerqueira, R. C., & Pedri, P. (2021). Politização de controvérsias científicas pela mídia brasileira em tempos de pandemia: a circulação de preprints sobre Covid-19 e seus reflexos. Revista Brasileira de História da Mídia, 10(1).
Park, D. W., Pooley, J., & Simonson, P. (2022). Exclusions/Exclusiones: The Role for History in the Field’s Reckoning. History of Media Studies, 2.
Parmar, I. (2012). Foundations of the American Century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations in the rise of American Power. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pohle, J., & Thiel, T. (2020). Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, 9(4), 1–19.
Riveros, P., Meriño, J., Crespo, F., & Baptista, B. (2022). Situated transdisciplinarity in university policy: Lessons for its institutionalization. Higher Education, 84(5), 1003–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00812-6
Ramiro Beltran, L. (1976). TV etchings in the minds of Latin Americans: Conservatism, materialism, and conformism. International Communication Gazette 24(1), 61–85.
Riani, H. (2017). Globalization and american power: (Dis)order through the politics of cultural imperialism. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(2), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2202035261
Sánchez-Tarragó, N., Fernández-Molina, J. C., & Caballero-Rivero, A. (2012). Reflexiones en torno al acceso abierto a la información en el contexto cubano: el caso del sector Salud. Informação & Sociedade, 22(2), 1–10.
Schiller, D. (1999). Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. MIT Press.
Schwartzman, S. (1991). Latin America: Higher education in a lost decade. Prospects, 21(3), 363–373.
Simonson, P., Park, D. W. & Pooley, J. 2022. Exclusions/Exclusiones: The Role for
Straubhaar, J. D. (1991). Beyond media imperialism: Assymetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 8(1), 39–59.
Suzina, A. C. (2021). English as lingua franca. Or the sterilisation of scientific work. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 171–179.
Teichman, J. (2004). The World Bank and policy reform in Mexico and Argentina. Latin American Politics and Society, 46(1), 39–74.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Vessuri, H., Guédon, J. C., & Cetto, A. M. (2014). Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development. Current Sociology, 62(5), 647–665.
Volodenkov, S. V., Fedorchenko, S. N., & Artamonova, Y. D. (2022). Contemporary state in the context of digital technological transformations: Political opportunities, risks, and challenges. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 24(3), 351–366.
Wang, Y., & Gray, J. E. (2022). China’s evolving Stance against tech monopolies: A moment of international alignment in an era of digital sovereignty. Media International Australia, 185(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X221105124.
Wiedemann, T., & Meyen, M. (2016). Internationalization through Americanization: The expansion of the International Communication Association’s leadership to the world. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1489–1509.
Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. New Labor Forum, 28(1), 10–29.
Anderson, W. (1992). “Where every prospect pleases and only man is vile”: Laboratory medicine as colonial discourse. Critical Inquiry, 18(3), 506–529.
Anderson, W., & Adams, V. (2007). Pramoedya’s chickens: Postcolonial studies of technoscience. In E. J. Hackett, S. Turner, O. Amsterdamska, W. E. Bijker, M. E. Lynch, J. Wajcman, L. Smith-Doerr, M. Solomon, A. Supnithadnaporn, & C. Thorpe (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (3rd ed., pp. 181–204). MIT Press.
Andrejevic, M. (2014). The big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673–1689.
Axster, S., Danewid, I., Goldstein, A., Mahmoudi, M., Tansel, C. B., & Wilcox, L. (2021). Colonial lives of the carceral archipelago: Rethinking the neoliberal security state. International Political Sociology, 15(3), 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab013
Bächtold, S. (2015). The rise of an anti-politics machinery: peace, civil society and the focus on results in Myanmar. Third World Quarterly, 36(10), 1968–1983. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1063406
Bächtold, S. (2022). The smartphone and the coup: How Myanmar’s conflicts are entangled with digital technologies, policies and violence. International Journal of Public Policy, 16(5/6), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2022.127428
Bächtold, S. (2023). Blackouts, whitelists, and ‘Terrorist Others’: The role of socio-technical imaginaries in Myanmar. Journal of intervention and statebuilding. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2022.2152940
Bächtold, S., Bastide, J., & Lundsgaard-Hansen, L. (2020). Assembling drones, activists and oil palms: Implications of a multi-stakeholder land Platform for state formation in Myanmar. The European Journal of Development Research, 32(2), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00267-y
Barder, A. D. (2015). Empire within: International hierarchy and its imperial laboratories of governance. Routledge.
Buscemi, F. (2021). The art of arms (not) being governed: Means of violence and shifting territories in the borderworlds of Myanmar. Geopolitics, 28(1), 282–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1901083
Chonka, P., Diepeveen, S., & Haile, Y. (2022). Algorithmic power and African indigenous languages: search engine autocomplete and the global multilingual Internet. Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221104705
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2018). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Décobert, A., & Wells, T. (2020). Interpretive Complexity and Crisis: the History of International Aid to Myanmar. The European Journal of Development Research, 32(2), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00238-y
Deejay, A., Wells, T., Henne, K., & Bächtold, S. (2023). Bad adopters or bad proponents of technology? Facebook and the violence against Muslims in Myanmar. Third World Quarterly, 45(8), 1309–1324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2285808
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Fanon, F. (1961). Les damnés de la terre. Librairie François Maspero.
Faxon, H. O., Kintzi, K., Tran, V., Wine, K. Z., & Htut, S. Y. (2023). Organic online politics: Farmers, Facebook, and Myanmar’s military coup. Big Data & Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231168101
Fiskesjö, M. (2022). The Wa of the Burma-China borderlands: Identities and polities in the maelstrom of world-system cycles. In J. J. P. Wouters & M. T. Heneise (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Highland Asia (pp. 339–350). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345746-31
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Gray, C. (2023). More than Extraction: Rethinking data’s colonial political economy. International Political Sociology, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olad007
Haupt, J. (2021). Facebook futures: Mark Zuckerberg’s discursive construction of a better world. New Media & Society, 23(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929315
Holliday, I. (2011). Burma redux: Global justice and the quest for political reform in Myanmar. Columbia University Press.
Htaike Htaike Aung, & Wai Myo Htut (2019). From blogging to digital rights: Telecommunication reform in Myanmar. In L. Brooten, J. McElhone, & G. Venkiteswaran (Eds.), Myanmar media in transition: Legacies, challenges, and change (pp. 366–376). ISEAS Publishing.
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
Katzenbach, C. (2021). “AI will fix this” – The technical, discursive, and political turn to AI in governing communication. Big Data & Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211046182
Khalili, L. (2010). The location of Palestine in global counterinsurgencies. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42(3), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020743810000425
Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class, 60(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172
Kyaw Yin Hlaing. (2012). Understanding recent political changes in Myanmar. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 34(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1353/csa.2012.0015
Leong, L. (2017). Mobile Myanmar: The development of a mobile app culture in Yangon. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917689950
Lim, M. (2020). The politics and perils of dis/connection in the Global South. Media, Culture & Society, 42(4), 618–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720914032
Lindskov Jacobsen, K. (2015). The politics of humanitarian technology: Good intentions, unintended consequences and insecurity. Routledge.
Madianou, M. (2019). Technocolonialism: Digital innovation and data practices in the humanitarian response to refugee crises. Social Media + Society, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863146
Mark, S. (2023). Forging the nation: Land struggles in Myanmar’s transition period. University of Hawai’i Press.
Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.
McCarthy, G. (2017). Cyber-Spaces. In A. Simpson, N. Farelly, & I. Holliday (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar (pp. 92–105). Routledge.
McCarthy, G., & Menager, J. (2017). Gendered rumours and the Muslim scapegoat in Myanmar’s transition. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(3), 396–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1304563
Meehan, P., & Sadan, M. (2017). Borderlands. In A. Simpson, N. Farelly, & I. Holliday (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar (pp. 83–91). Routledge.
Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647
Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the South(s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. Public Affairs.
Prasad, R. (2017). Ascendant India, digital India: How net neutrality advocates defeated Facebook’s Free Basics. Media, Culture & Society, 40(3), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717736117
Prasse-Freeman, E. (2021). Hate Bait, Micro-publics, and National(ist) Conversations on Burmese Facebook. Independent Journal of Burmese Scholarship, 1(December), 144–204.
Quet, M., & Dahdah, M. A. (2020). Technologies without borders? The digitization of society in a postcolonial world. Science, Technology and Society, 25(3), 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721820912894
Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640
Rider, K., & Murakami Wood, D. (2018). Condemned to connection? Network communitarianism in Mark Zuckerberg’s “Facebook Manifesto”. New Media & Society, 21(3), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818804772
Ryan, M., & Tran, M. V. (2022). Democratic backsliding disrupted: The role of digitalized resistance in Myanmar. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 9(1), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911221125511
Sablosky, J. (2021). Dangerous organizations: Facebook’s content moderation decisions and ethnic visibility in Myanmar. Media, Culture & Society, 43(6), 1017–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720987751
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Routledge.
Schissler, M. (2016). On Islamophobes and Holocaust deniers: Making sense of violence, in Myanmar and elsewhere. In N. Cheesman & N. Farelly (Eds.), Conflict in Myanmar: War, Politics, Religion (pp. 283–309). ISEAS Publishing.
Schissler, M. (2024). Beyond Hate Speech and Misinformation: Facebook and the Rohingya Genocide in Myanmar. Journal of Genocide Research, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2024.2375122
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
South, A., & Lall, M. (Eds.). (2017). Citizenship in Myanmar: Ways of being in and from Burma. ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Wade, F. (2017). Myanmar’s enemy within: Buddhist violence and the making of a Muslim ‘other’. Zed Books.
Walton, M. J., & Hayward, S. (2014). Contesting Buddhist narratives: Democratization, nationalism, and communal violence in Myanmar. East-West Center.
Whitten-Woodring, J., Kleinberg, M. S., Thawnghmung, A. M., & Thitsar, M. T. (2020). Poison if you don’t know how to use it: Facebook, democracy, and human rights in Myanmar. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220919666
Woods, K. (2011). Ceasefire capitalism: military–private partnerships, resource concessions and military–state building in the Burma–China borderlands. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.607699
Yan Naung Oak, & Brooten, L. (2019). The tea shop meets the 8 o’clock news: Facebook, convergence and online public spaces. In L. Brooten, J. McElhone, & G. Venkiteswaran (Eds.), Myanmar Media in Transition: Legacies, Challenges, and Change (pp. 325–365). ISEAS Publishing. http://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/search/ISEASB0000754.html
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Althusser, L. (2004) [1968]. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In J. Rivkin & M. Ryan (Eds.), Literary Theory: An Anthology (pp. 768–777). Blackwell Publishing.
Bayer, J. B., Anderson, I. A., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2022). Building and breaking social media habits. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101303
Bolter, J.D. (2019). The digital plenitude: The decline of elite culture and the rise of new media. MIT Press.
Buchanan, I. (2020). Assemblage theory and method. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Chen, Y., Mao, Z., & Qiu, J. L. (2018). Super-Sticky design and everyday cultures. In Super-Sticky Wechat and Chinese Society (pp. 47–76). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-091-420181004
Cheney-Lippold, J. (2017). We are data. New York University Press.
Clauss, T., Harengel, P., & Hock, M. (2019). The perception of value of platform-based business models in the sharing economy: Determining the drivers of user loyalty. Review of Managerial Science, 13(3), 605–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0313-0
Day, R.E. (2014). Indexing it all: The subject in the age of documentation, information, and data. MIT Press.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. SAGE.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October 59, 3–7.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004) [1980]. A thousand plateaus. A&C Black.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009) [1972]. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Penguin.
Dencik, L., Hintz, A., Redden, J., & Treré, E. (2019). Exploring data justice: Conceptions, applications and directions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 873–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606268
Dijck, J. van. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
Dijck, van J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Enikolopov, R., Makarin, A., & Petrova, M. (2020). Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia. Econometrica, 88(4), 1479–1514. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14281
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. The University of Massachusetts Press.
Foucault, M. (2003) [1997]. Society must be defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975–76. Penguin.
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1348–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472322
Gray, J. (2018). Three aspects of data worlds. Krisis, 38(1), 4–17.
Guattari, F. (2005) [1989]. The three ecologies. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hepp, A. (2020). Deep mediatization. Routledge.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-Specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 175–219.https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O
Korstanje, J. (2022). Machine learning on geographical data using python. Apress.
Kruikemeier, S., Sezgin, M., & Boerman, S. C. (2016). Political microtargeting: Relationship between personalized advertising on Facebook and voters’ responses. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(6), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0652
Lovink, G. (2019). Sad by design: On platform nihilism. Pluto Press.
Lupton, D. (2019). The thing-power of the human-app health assemblage: Thinking with vital materialism. Social Theory & Health, 17(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00096-y
Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 2053951714541861. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861
Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. John Wiley & Sons.
Mazel, A.G. (2019). Governing food: Media, politics and pleasure. [PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam]. University of Amsterdam Digital Academic Repository.
Milan, S. (2015). When algorithms shape collective action: Social media and the dynamics of cloud protesting. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115622481
Morozov, E. (2014). To save everything, click here. PublicAffairs.
Nguyen, D., & Beijnon, B. (2024) The data subject and the myth of the ‘black box’ data communication and critical data literacy as a resistant practice to platform exploitation. Information, Communication & Society. 27(2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2205504
Nieborg, D.B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694
Pamart, M. (Director). (1988). D comme Désir [TV series episode]. In Boutang. P. (Executive Producer), L’Abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze. La Fémis; Sodaperaga Productions.
Rouvroy, A. (2013). The end(s) of critique: Data behaviourism versus due process. In M. Hildebrandt & K. de Vries (Eds.), Privacy, Due Process and the Computational Turn (pp. 143–168). Routledge.
Sanders, R. (2017). Self-tracking in the Digital Era: Biopower, Patriarchy, and the New Biometric Body Projects. Body & Society, 23(1), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X16660366
Stanfill, M. (2015). The interface as discourse: The production of norms through web design. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814520873
