| Figures | ||
| 2.1. | The idea regarding anchor-test-random-groups design | 15 |
| 2.2. | Three curves generated by GITEST, BILOG, and PARSCALE | 18 |
| 2.3. | Four curves generated by GITEST and WINSTEPS | 19 |
| 4.1. | An example Assessment Timeline (assessment within a course) | 43 |
| 4.2. | An example partial Assessment Landscape (assessment across courses at one level of study) | 43 |
| 4.3. | An example Assessment Landscape (assessment across courses at two levels of study) | 44 |
| 4.4. | An example of an Assessment Map | 45 |
| 4.5. | An example of an Assessment Landscape produced within the university’s LMS | 46 |
| 6.1. | Student views | 68 |
| 6.2. | A sample of log stream data | 68 |
| 6.3. | Example of video recording of two students working on the Laughing Clowns Task | 69 |
| Tables | ||
| 2.1. | Item difficulty of MET 1988–1992 | 17 |
| 2.2. | Ability (θ) of MET 1988–1992 | 17 |
| 6.1. | Process comparison | 71 |
| 6.2. | CPS process framework | 78 |
| 6.3. | Guttman analysis of the scored outcomes | 81 |
| 6.4. | Scoring interpretation of the CPS process framework | 83 |
| 7.1. | Demographic information on study participants | 95 |
| 7.2. | Descriptive statistics for the COA of all teachers (n=33) | 96 |
| 7.3. | Descriptive statistics for the COA of teachers with and without an assessment role | 97 |
| 7.4. | Themes regarding teacher perceptions of assessment that emerge from the written responses of the participants | 99 |
List of Figures and Tables
In: International Trends in Educational AssessmentSearch for other papers by Myint Swe Khine in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed