The alignment splits in the Neo-Aramaic languages display a considerable degree of diversity, especially in terms of agreement. While earlier studies have generally oversimplified the actual state of affairs, Paul M. Noorlander offers a meticulous and clear account of nearly all microvariation documented so far, addressing all relevant morphosyntactic phenomena. By means of fully glossed and translated examples, the author shows that this vast variation in morphological alignment, including ergativity, is unexpected from a functional typological perspective. He argues the alignment splits are rather the outcome of several construction-specific processes such as internal system harmonization and grammaticalization, as well as language contact.
Paul M. Noorlander, Ph.D. (2018) is currently a Rubicon Fellow at Leiden University seconded to the University of Cambridge. He is involved in Neo-Aramaic documentation and has published on various topics in Semitic languages and linguistics and contact with Indo-European.
Preface List of Figures, Maps and Tables Abbreviations and Symbols
1 Introduction
â1.1âErgativity, an Enigma in Semitic Linguistics?
â1.2âNeo-Aramaic Dialects in the Land of Rivers
â1.5âPrevious Approaches to Alignment in Eastern Neo-Aramaic
â1.6âAims and Scope of This Book
â1.7âSources and Transcription Conventions
â1.8âOutline
2 Who Did What to Whom in the Context of Neo-Aramaic
â2.1âMain Components of Verbal Inflection in Neo-Aramaic
â2.2â(Pro)nominals and Verbal Constructions Derived from (Pro)nominals
â2.3âDefining and Identifying the Alignment of Who Did What to Whom
â2.4âConclusion: A Construction-Specific Approach
â2.5âOverviews of Inflection
3 Ergativity and Its Typology: The Trans-Zab Jewish Dialects
â3.1âMain Morphosyntactic Hallmarks
â3.2âErgativity and Alignment Splits in Typological Perspectives
â3.3âErgativity and Patient-Related Splits in Trans-Zab Jewish NENA
â3.4âErgativity and Splits along the Tense-Aspect-Mood Scale
â3.5âErgativity and Transitivity: Argument Omission and Valency Alternations
â3.6âConclusion: Construction-Specific, Not Alignment-Specific Factors
4 Christian and Western Jewish Dialects of NENA
â4.1âPreliminary Notes on Morphosyntax
â4.2âErgative or Passive? Agents In and Out of Focus
â4.3âVerb-Related Factors: Grammaticalization of Resultatives
â4.4âArgument-Related Factors: Harmonizing the Object
â4.5âConclusion: Cross-System Harmonization
5 Below the Tigris: The Neo-Aramaic Dialects of Ṭur ʿAbdin and Mlaḥsó
â5.1âMorphosyntactic Traits of Central Neo-Aramaic
â5.2âThe Neo-Aramaic Dialects of Ṭur Ê¿Abdin
â5.3âThe Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Mlaḥsó
â5.4âThe Primacy of Intransitive Coding
â5.5âSummary from Stem to Stern
6 Cross-Dialectal Synopsis of the Morphosyntax
â6.1âTense-Aspect-Sensitive Splits
â6.2âMorphological Splits
â6.3âSplits and Transitivity Alternations
â6.4âSplits Based on Argument Properties
7 General Conclusion
â7.1âConstructions Leading a Life of Their Own
â7.2âA Taxonomy of Major Alignment Types
References Index
All interested in linguistics, especially language typology, syntax and morphology, and contact between languages of the Middle East, particularly Aramaic-Iranian. Examples are fully glossed and translated.