Social and Cultural Memory in Biblical Exegesis: The Quest for an Adaequate Application was originally published in: Carstens, Pernille; Hasselbalch, Trine; Lemche, Niels Peter (Ed.): Cultural Memory in Biblical Exegesis (Perspectives on Hebrew Scriptures and its Contexts 17). Piscataway NJ 2012, 175–199.
“You cannot live with an experience that remains without a story:” Memory Theory and How Mark’s Gospel Narrates Experiences with Jesus was written for this publication.
“Frozen Moments”: Early Christianity through the Lens of Social Memory Theory was originally published in: Butticaz, Simon; Norelli, Enrico (Hg.) Memory and Memories in Early Christianity (WUNT I). Tübingen 2018, 17–43.
What’s Form got to do with it? Preliminaries on the Impact of Social Memory Theory for the Study of Biblical Intertextuality was originally published in: David P. Moessner, Matthew Calhoun, and Tobias Nicklas (Hg.), The Gospel and Ancient Literary Criticism: Continuing the Debate on Gospel Genre(s). WUNT 2. Tübingen 2020, 145–176.
Proclamation Rejected, Truth Confirmed. Reading John 12:37–44 in a Social Memory Theoretical Framework was originally published in: Hatina, Thomas R (Hg.), Biblical Interpretation in Early Christian Gospels: Volume 4: The Gospel of John. LNTS 613. London 2020, 183–200.
Collective Memory, Cultural Texts, and Mark’s Gospel is a translation of “Kollektives Gedächtnis, Kulturelle Texte und das Markusevangelium”, was originally published in: van Oyen, Geert (Hg.) Reading the Gospel of Mark in the Twenty-First Century. BETL 301. Leuven: Peeters 2019, 217–250.
Pseudepigraphy as a Strategy in Early Christian Identity Discourses? The Letter to the Colossians as a test case is a translation of “Pseudepigraphie als Strategie in frühchristlichen Identitätsdiskursen? Überlegungen am Beispiel des Kolosserbriefs” originally published in SNTU.A 36 (2011), 63–94.
Experience that makes itself legible: Colossians and Second Thessalonians as Fictional Texts is a translation of “Erfahrung, die sich lesbar macht. Kol und 2 Thess als fiktionale Texte”, originally published in: Luther, Susanne; Röder, Jörg; Schmidt, Eckart (Hg.): Wie Geschichten Geschichte schreiben. Frühchristliche Literatur zwischen Faktualität und Fiktionalität (WUNT II 395). Tübingen 2015, 295–336.
Generations: Social Memory Theory and the Letters to the Thessalonians was written for this publication.
Polycarp Unchained: How Cultural Studies can enhance Patristic Research was originally published in Vetera Christianorum 57 (2020) 131–145.