This book explores the influence of religious lawfare through the use of conscience-based claimsâassertions rooted in individual or group religious or moral convictionsâon shaping public policy and law, and their repercussions for democracy and human rights. It unveils a framework that not only defines but also systematizes uses of conscience-based claims, challenging prevalent notions about the motivations and actors behind religious lawfare. By contextualizing this expansion historically, it identifies new uses of these claims as undemocratic and explores global efforts to regulate them through international human rights and comparative law. Ultimately, the book offers a normative guide for handling conscience-based claims in liberal democracies.
Introduction
â1 The Contours
â2 Approach and Perspective
â3 The Structure
â4 The Exploration
1 Religious Lawfare: a Challenge to Liberal Democracies
â1 The Point of Departure
ââ1.1 Populism as a Challenge to Cosmopolitanism
ââ1.2 The Rise of Conservative Religious Groups
ââ1.3 Conservative Religious Groups Gaining Power
â2 Assertive Multiculturalism: a Theory
â3 Conservative Religious Movements and the Future of Liberal Democracies
â4 Conclusion
2 Waging Religious Lawfare through Conscience-Based Claims
â1 Religious Lawfare and Conscience-Based Claims
â2 The Juridification of Conscience
ââ2.1 History and Origins
ââ2.2 Conscientious Objection as a Legal Right
ââ2.3 Juridifying Conscience
â3 Conscience-Based Claims as Theocratization Tools
â4 Religious Lawfare in Healthcare
â5 Conclusion
3 Religious Lawfare: a Threat to Democracy and Human Rights
â1 Political Uses of Conscience-Based Claims
â2 Coercion, Democracy and Conscience
â3 Political Uses of Conscience-Based Claims Are Harmful
â4 Conclusion
4 Legal Efforts to Counter Religious Lawfare
â1 Countering Religious Lawfare: Universal Human Rights System
â2 Countering Religious Lawfare: Regional Human Rights Systems
ââ2.1 European Human Rights System
ââ2.2 Inter-American Human Rights System
ââ2.3 African Human Rights System
â3 Conclusion
5 Religious Lawfare at Play: Conscientious Objection in Healthcare
â1 Conscience-Based Claims to the Provision of Healthcare Services
â2 Dealing with âVertical Expansionsâ of Conscience-Based Claims
ââ2.1 The Need to Limit Conscientious Objection in Healthcare
ââ2.2 Dealing with Conscientious Objection in Healthcare beyond Human Rights Standards
ââ2.3 A Model Regulation of Conscientious Objection in Healthcare
â3 Dealing with âHorizontal Expansionsâ of Conscience-Based Claims
ââ3.1 Views on Institutional Conscientious Objection
ââ3.2 Institutional Conscientious Objection through Comparative Law Lens
ââ3.3 Healthcare, Institutions and Role of the State
â4 Conclusion
6 A Path Forward: Mitigating the Impact of Religious Lawfare
â1 The Need for a New Normative Basis
ââ1.1 From Non-interference to Non-domination
ââ1.2 Freedom as Non-domination and New Uses of Conscience-based Claims
â2 A Path Forward for Conscience-Based Claims and for Liberal Democracies
â3 Conclusion
Conclusion
Table of Cases
Table of Instruments
Bibliography
Index
Academics, practitioners, advocates, students and laypersons interested in the relationship between religion, law, and politics, and the fields of international human rights law, sexual and reproductive rights, and democratic theory.