Over the past few decades, it has become increasingly frequent to come across the co-existence of multiple large-scale assessment surveys within national, subnational, or local settings. Despite the overlapping of tests, time, efforts, and economic resources invested in these âassessment assemblagesâ, much remains to be learned about their origins, development, tensions, frictions, outcomes, and challenges. Harmony and Cacophony in Large-scale Assessments in Education delves into these issues via a critical lens and offers a case in point against which readers can place their own situations. In other words, it serves as an empirically grounded thinking toolbox to help readers problematize emerging, ongoing, or upcoming challenges related to their large-scale assessment settings.
Israel Moreno Salto, Ph.D. (2020), University of Cambridge, is Professor of Education Sciences at the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Israel has published journal articles and book chapters on comparative education, education governance and large-scale assessments in Mexico.
Foreword: Choreographing the Governing of Education
âSusan L. Robertson
List of Figures and Tables
PART 1: The Large-scale Assessment Assemblage
1 Introduction: Problematizing Large-scale Assessment Programs
â1 Locating the Problem
â2 Large-scale Assessment Arrangements in a Global Context
â3 Large-scale Assessment and Governance Literatures
â4 Purpose of the Research
â5 Theoretical and Methodological Approach
â6 Layout of the Book
2 The Rise and Development of Large-scale Assessments as Tools for Governing
â1 Understanding Large-scale Assessments
â2 Large-scale Assessments Today, a Complex and Neglected Concept
â3 Efforts to Improve Education Systems
â2 Governing the Education Sector
â3 Conclusions
3 Expanding Our Understandings of Large-scale Assessments and Governance
â1 Large-scale Assessments and Governance
â2 Thinking and Pedagogical Tools
â3 Conclusions
4 Mexicoâs Cacophony or Harmony of Large-scale Assessments?
â1 Large-scale Assessment Programs in Mexico
â2 PISA
â3 ERCE-LLECE
â4 PLANEA and Predecessors
â5 LSA s and Claims to Aiding Policy Decisions and Education Practices
â6 Conclusions
PART 2: Large-scale Assessments at the Local, Subnational and National
5 Local Scale: Teachers
â1 Sources of Data for Unit One
â2 Context of the Local Unit of Analysis
â3 Large-scale Assessments in the Subnational State
â4 Large-scale Assessment Data for Aiding Practice Improvement
â5 What Do Educators Know about Large-scale Assessments?
â6 Program Knowledge, Depth and Acquaintance
â7 Offering Data to Which Educators?
â8 PISA and PLANEA Publications
â9 Perceived Usefulness of Large-scale Assessment Data
â10 Unintended Large-scale Assessment Data Effects at the Local Scale
â11 Relevance of Large-scale Assessment Programs, What about the Bigger Picture?
â12 Conclusions
6 Subnational Scale: Municipal and State Policymakers
â1 Sources of Data for the Subnational Case
â2 EXCALE Large-scale Assessment
â3 Context of Preschool Education
â4 The EXCALEâs Use in Kindergarten Initiative
â5 Use of Results?
â6 Math and Literacy: A Myth?
â7 Conclusions
7 National Scale: Legislators and Secretariat Officials
â1 Policy I: The General Law for the Professional Teaching Service
â2 Policy II: Key Learnings for an Integral Education
â3 Conclusions
PART 3: Expanding Our Understandings of Large-scale Assessments
8 Governing Tools: How Large-scale Assessments Shape Visions?
â1 Scales, Bits and Tools
â2 Shaping Vertical Vision
â3 Governing Tools and the ERCE-LLECE Case
â4 Conclusions
9 Conclusions
â1 Main Research Concluding Thoughts
â2 Contributions of This Study
â3 The Large-Scale Assessment Landscape in Mexico Since the Study
â4 Future Research
References
Index
University and college libraries around the world, especially those where education policy, education governance and large-scale assessments, and comparative education are provided as a subject of study and professional training.