The history of noncombatant immunity is well established. What is less understood is how militaries have rationalized violating this immunity. This book traces the development of how militaries have rationalized the killing of the innocent from the thirteenth century onward. In the process, this historiography shows how we have arrived at the ascendant convention that assumes militaries should not intentionally kill the innocent. Furthermore, it shows how moral arguments about the permissibility of killing the innocent are largely adaptations to material changes in how wars are fought, whether through technological innovations or changes in institutional structures.
Brian Smith, Ph.D. (2016), Boston University, is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Nazarbayev University. He has published many articles on intellectual history and a monograph, John Locke, Territory, and Transmigration (Routledge, 2021).
List of Figures
Introduction
â1âIntroduction
â2âTheory of Moral Development
â3âMethodology
â4âOverview of Chapters
PART 1: Killing the Innocent: Three Discursive Traditions from the Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries
1 The Origins of Double Effect: The Scholastic Tradition
â1âRecovering the Primitive Christian Tradition
â2âBefore Double Effect
â3âThe Rise of Double Effect
â4âKilling the Innocent
â5âKilling the Innocent after Aquinas
â6âRepurposing Double Effect in the Sixteenth Century
â7âSixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Scholastics on Siege Warfare
â8âEnglish and Scottish Protestants
â9âConclusion
2 Martialists: Soldiers and Tacticians
â1âIntroduction
â2âEarly Martialists
â3âSeventeenth-Century Martialists
â4âShifts in the Martialist Tradition
â5âConclusion
3 Humanists and Republicans
â1âIntroduction
â2âMachiavelli
â3âErasmus
â4âGentili
â5âGrotius
â6âPufendorf
â7âJeremy Taylor
â8âGeorge Dawson
â9âChristian Wolff
â10âVattel
â11âConclusion
PART 2: The Nineteenth Century
4 Killing Noncombatants in the Nineteenth Century
â1âIntroduction
â2âCounting Casualties
â3âNoncombatants
â4âSovereignty and Self-Preservation
â5âUtilitarianism
â6âThe Link between Philosophical Utilitarianism and Military Necessity
â7âConclusion
5 Deliberately Targeting Noncombatants
â1âIntroduction
â2âEnduring the Hardships of War: Laying Waste
â3âLaying Waste and the Laws of War
â4âStarvation and Blockades
â5âSieges
â6âSiege and the Laws of War
â7âReprisal, Retaliation, Retorsion
â8âChange in Norms
â9âThe Spatial Dimension of Noncombatant Death
â10âNoncombatant Death in the Early Twentieth Century
â11âMilitary Manuals
â12âConclusion
PART 3: The Twentieth Century: Aerial Bombing and a Shift in Norms
6 New Possibilities and Problems: Aeronauts, Inventors, and Future-War Fiction on Aerial Bombing
â1âEarly Experiments
â2âDeterrence, Annihilation, or Nonfactor?
â3âFuture-War Fiction
â4âConclusion
7 Interwar Approaches to Bombing: Two Discursive Traditions
â1âIntroduction
â2âInterwar Period Debates on Aerial Bombing
â3âInternational Liberals: Regulation and Disarmament
â4âBombing Realists
â5âStrategic versus Terror Bombing
â6âConclusion
8 The Return to Intention: Post World War I
â1âIntroduction
â2âGerman Guilt
â3âThe Laws of Humanity and Intentional Harm
â4âThe Return of the Scholastics
â5âThe Rediscovery of Vitoria and Suarez
â6âCatholics against Bombing
â7âConclusion
9 Postscript: Intention in the Twenty-First Century
â1âIntroduction
â2âIntention and Folk Psychology
â3âAre Intentions Relevant for Twenty-First Century War?
Bibliography of Primary Sources 445
âPrior to the Sixteenth Century
âThe Sixteenth Century
âThe Seventeenth Century
âThe Eighteenth Century
âThe Nineteenth Century
Index
Libraries, institutes, specialists, and students interested in military history, intellectual history, history of ideas, political theory, and international relations.