The oceans provide a vivid illustration of the relationship between an ever-changing context and a formalistic legal framework. The 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, hailed as one of the greatest achievements of international law-making, is confronted with dramatically different present-day exigencies. Change in the Law of the Sea provides an analysis and synthesis of the mechanisms that allow this âoldâ treaty to respond to its contemporary context, shining new light not only on how change occurs in international law, but also on how the sources of demand for change are themselves changing.
Rozemarijn J. Roland Holst (PhD cum laude 2020, Utrecht University) is Assistant Professor of Public International Law at Utrecht University. She has published articles and book chapters on contemporary challenges in the law of the sea and general international law.
List of Cases
Abbreviations
1âThe Law of the Sea Amidst Changing Tides
â1âIntroduction
â2âChange in the Law of the Sea: Reflections on Method, Theory and Scope
â2.1âA Constitutional Perspective
â2.2âStability and Change in Treaties
â2.3âConceptualising Change
â3âAnalytical Framework
â3.1âLaw in Context
â3.2âMechanisms for Change
â3.3âChange in Practice
â4âOutline
2âChange Throughout Time Charting a Course towards a Landmark Convention
â1âIntroduction
â2âA Brief History of the Seas
â2.1âFrom âAppropriationâ to âAppurtenanceâ and the Turn to Codification
â2.2âNew Prospects and a New International Economic Order
â3âThe Third UN Conference on the Law of the Sea
â3.1âThe Process
â3.2âNegotiating Methods: The Consensus Package Deal
â3.3âThe Ideal of Universality and the Disagreement over the Deep Seabed Regime
â4âConclusion
3âSharing Powers and Balancing Interests The âDeep Structureâ of the Convention
â1âIntroduction
â2âSovereignty and Common Interests in the Law of the Sea
â2.1âThe Ambiguous Position of Sovereignty
â2.2âSovereign Interest versus Common Interest
â2.3âA Functional Perception of Sovereignty
â2.3.1âConsent to Process of Normative Development
â2.3.2âConceptions of âCommonalityâ in unclos and General International Law
â3âSovereignty over the Territorial Sea
â3.1ââSubject to the Conventionâ
â3.2ââSubject to Other Rules of International Lawâ
â4âSovereign Rights and Functional Jurisdiction in the eez
â4.1âFunctional Jurisdiction and the âNecessity Testâ
â4.2âMutual Obligation of âDue Regardâ
â4.3âDistributional Mechanisms in the eez: A Mute Provision
â5âSovereign Rights over the Continental Shelf
â5.1âNo âUnjustifiable Interferenceâ: Due Regard Extended
â5.2âBalancing Interests on the Outer Continental Shelf
â6âFreedom of the High Seas
â6.1âDue Regard
â6.2âSupplementing Exclusive Flag State Jurisdiction
â6.3âA âManaged Commonsâ: Obligations to Cooperate
â7âThe Area: Common Heritage of Humankind
â7.1âThe Common Heritage Principle
â7.2âChanges Made by the 1994 Implementing Agreement
â8âConclusion
4âTreaty-Based Mechanisms for Change
â1âIntroduction
â2âFormal Change by the States Parties
â2.1âFormal Amendment Procedures
â2.2âOther Mechanisms for Formal Change by States Parties and Their Limits
â2.2.1âReservations
â2.2.2âInter Se Modification by Subsequent Agreement
â2.2.3âOther Agreements
â2.3âRole of the splos
â2.4âRole of the unga
â3âChange through unclos Institutions
â3.1âThe clcs
â3.2âThe isa
â3.2.1âThe Institutional Setup of the isa
â3.2.2âThe isa at a Crossroads
â3.3âThe itlos and unclos Dispute Settlement
â3.3.1âThe Compulsory Dispute Settlement System
â3.3.2âThe Role of the itlos
â3.3.3âThe Functions of Dispute Settlement under the Convention
â4âChange through Rules of Reference
â4.1âGeneral Functions of the Rules of Reference
â4.2âVarying Degrees of Normativity
â4.3âWhat are âGenerally Accepted International Rules and Standardsâ?
â4.3.1ââRulesâ and âStandardsâ
â4.3.2ââGenerally Acceptedâ
â5âConclusion
5âChange through Interpretative Practice
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Role of Interpretation in the âLifeâ of a Treaty
â3âContemporaneous versus Evolutionary Interpretation
â3.1âEvolutionary Interpretation and the vclt
â3.1.1âCommon Entry Points for Evolutionary Interpretation
â3.1.2âThe Intention of the Parties
â3.1.3âChange through Legal Context: Article 31(3)(c) and Systemic Integration
â3.1.4âChange through Subsequent Conduct: Article 31(3)(a-b)
â3.2âConclusions on the Meaning of Evolutionary Interpretation
â4âEvolutionary Interpretation of unclos
â4.1âOpenings for Judicial Development through Interpretation
â4.1.1âRecourse to General International Law: Jurisdiction versus Applicable Law
â4.1.2âBalancing Principles and the Standard of Judicial Review
â4.1.3âEvolutionary Interpretation of Narrowly Described Rights
â4.1.4âEvolving Obligations: Due Diligence and the Protection of the Marine Environment
â4.1.4.1âThe Precautionary Approach
â4.1.4.2âObligation to Cooperate
â4.1.4.3âObligation to Conduct an eia
â4.1.4.4âConclusions on the Role of Due Diligence
â4.2âThe Role of Subsequent Agreements
â4.2.1âImplementing Agreements
â4.2.2âRegional Agreements
â4.3âThe Role of Subsequent Practice
â4.3.1âSubsequent Practice, Interpretation and Modification
â4.3.2âSubsequent Practice and Customary Law
â4.3.3âThe Role of Inconsistent State Practice
â4.3.4âThe Role of Soft Law
â5âConclusion
6âLaw in Context Change in Practice
â1âIntroduction
â2âMitigation
â2.1âMitigation Measures as Pollution Prevention under unclos
â2.1.1âMitigation Standards under the Rules of Reference
â2.1.2âDuty to Mitigate as Part of the General Obligation of Due Diligence
â2.2âOcean-Based Negative Emission Technologies and unclos
â2.2.1âOcean Fertilisation
â2.2.2âCarbon Capture and Storage
â2.2.3âConclusions on netâs, Climate Change and the Rules of Reference
â3âAdaptation
â3.1âLegal Adaptation to Changing Physical Circumstances: Sea-level Rise and Existing Maritime Entitlements
â3.2âLegal Adaptation to Changing Knowledge and Interests: Drafting the Exploitation Regulations for the Area
â3.2.1âThe Development of the isaâs Environmental Mandate over Time
â3.2.2âDeveloping the Exploitation Regulations
â4âRestoration
â4.1âMarine Environmental Restoration and the Law of the Sea
â4.2âA Novel Use of the High Seas: The Ocean Cleanup
â4.2.1âThe 2018 Agreement between the Netherlands and toc
â4.2.2âBalancing Unknown Risks: What Standard of Due Diligence?
â5âConclusion
7âConclusion
â1âChange in the Law of the Sea: A Multifaceted and Multi-localised Process
â2âunclos as a âLiving Treatyâ or a âLiving Treeâ: Natural Limits to Growth?
â3âMechanisms for Change: Between Context and Practice
Bibliography
Index
Scholars, post-graduate and research students, practitioners, (policy) experts in law of the sea, general international law (processes of change, law-making, international institutions), treaty law, global governance (legal dynamics of the Anthropocene).