In this book, William Brant uncovers social causes of violence, in search of reductive measures. Multiple legal systems are explored as reducers and implementers of violence and threats, especially criminal justice systems. War, propagandizing, power, corporate and governmental involvement in social domination, statehood, dangerous ideologies, and tribal sexual domination are explored in many cultures. Various levels and methods are given for observing, measuring and analyzing how people think and behave regarding the law, including examples of comedy. A theoretical chapter presents legal theory in relation to conceptions of possibility and misconceptions. These ideas are applied to judiciaries, which expose winning strategies for lawyersâ desired verdicts. Dr. Brant accounts for the interconnections between sexual selection, legal systems and wars.
William Allen Brant, Ph.D. (2011), Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, is co-founder and director of Ethical Conflict Consulting, a nonprofit organization that solves work-related problems with professional ethics. He is a martial artist, traveler and musician.
Acknowledgements List of Figures Introduction
1 Relations of law
â1 Understanding the Social Importance of Legal Systems
â2 Legal Systems as Crucial Parts of Real Statehood and Theoretic Minimal States
â3 Sociological Imaginations and Dangerous Legal Ideologies
â4 Mass Media Broadcasts of Social Events: Security with Systems
2 Incomprehensiveness of Just Legality and Illegality
â1 Ideological Confusion about Legal Systems Disregarding Alegality and Fraud
â2 Comparative Legal Studies: Western Influences on Islamic Systems
â3 The Concept of Alegality for Comparative Legal Studies and Rights
â4 Ideologies without Concepts of Alegality May Fail to Conceive of Indifference
â5 The Logical Structure of Legalization: Gradations of Legality
â6 The Significance of Mental States and Ideology
â7 Intersubjectivity: Nationhood, Law, Politics, and Economics
â8 Ideologies: Legality, Alegality, and Illegality, Despite Social Acceptability
3 Levels of Analyses of Law and Methods
â1 Integrative Levels: Classification Systems for Knowledge Organization and Law
â2 Methodological Concerns Regarding Legal Research
â3 Autobiographical, Biographical, and Historical and Sociological Ways of Thinking about Law
â4 Psychological Levels of Analysis: Situations of Law Enforcement
â5 Sociological Levels of Analysis: Legal Systems as Changing Sets of Communications
â6 Chemical and Neurobiological Levels of Analysis: Aspects of Law
â7 Logical Levels of Analysis: Philosophy of Law
â8 Historical Levels of Analysis: Philosophy of Law
â9 History of Philosophy and History of Philosophy of Law: System and Problem-thinking
â10 Dual Roles of Historical Occurrences
â11 Comedic Levels of Analysis of Law: Laughableness, Booing, and Applause
â12 Measurements and Observations Concerning the Comedic Level of Analysis of Law
4 Psychosociological Relations of Law
â1 Leadership Characterizes Successful Terrorizers as âCowardsâ: Upsides and Downsides
â2 Ways and Reasons of Propagandizing for the Retaliatory Society: Brave Heroes versus Villainous Cowards
â3 Real Phenomena: Energy as Legal, Alegal and Illegal Forms of Power
â4 Soft Power and Hard Power
â5 Psychosociological Analyses Concerning Law: Reasons for Greater Fears
â6 Moral Psychology: Problems Concerning Modelsâ Combinations of Multi-Leveled Observations
â7 Introduction to Moral Psychology
â8 Social Intuitionismâs Role in Moral Psychology
â9 Moral Judgment and Action Requires Attention, Intention, Memory Capacity, and âBeing in Controlâ
â10 Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism
â11 Duty Ethics: Deontology
â12 The Social Intuitionist Model Describes âOut-of-Controlâ Moral Decisions
â13 Disbelief in Free Will and Dangers and Influences of Social Intuitionist Models May Reduce Feelings of Moral Responsibility
5 Comprehensive Conceptions of Possibility: Legal Theory
â1 Modal Theory and Possibility Theory: Social Implications
â2 Presumptions Concerning the Critique of the Concepts of Possibility
â3 Inclusive Disjunctive Possibility: Possibility as an Indifferent, Abstract, and Broad Conception
â4 Possibility and Impossibility in relation to Logicality, Physicality, and Law
â5 An Application of the Concepts of Physicality, Logicality, and Modalities for Courts of Law
â6 Coincidence as Inessentiality or Accidence: Abstract Concepts and Particulars
â7 The Starting Point of Legal Studies: Realityâs Givenness, Theoretic Doubt of the Real World, and Theoretic Consideration of Multiple Possible Worlds
â8 The Concept of Metaphysical Possibility: Inclusive Disjunction and Possibility Concerning Metaphysic Content
â9 Real Possibility: Requiring Real Fulfillment and More Exclusive Disjunctions
â10 Contradictoriness for Real Possibility and Logical Possibility: Exclusive and Inclusive Disjunction and Legal Maxims
â11 Real Possibility: Supporting Arguments, Historic Origins and Law
â12 Recollective Possibility: Expectation and Recognition of the (Un)Real via Possibilistic rather than Probabilistic Cognitions and Knowledge
â13 Methodological Problems for the Conceptions of Possibility
â14 Synopsis and Future Directions of Research: Possibility Theory for Law
6 The F-Problem
â1 The Economic Problem, the F-Problem, and Human Overpopulation
â2 Legal Encouragement and Discouragement of Fertilization and Corporate Impacts on the Planet
â3 The F-problem, Eugenics, and Misconceptions about Human Sexual Reproduction
â4 Violence Directed toward Intersexuals, Transsexuals, and Non-heterosexuals as a Form of Social Dominance
â5 Opposing Concepts of Human Generation: Importance of Adolescent Pregnancies
â6 Increasing the Number of Competitors for Resources Increases Amounts of Competition
â7 Victimizations and Contributing to the Disorganizations of Societal Systems
â8 Relations of the F-Problem to Victimization as a Form of Theft
â9 War as an F-Problem and Peace: Sexual Selection and Rites
â10 Conclusion
Bibliography
All interested in legal philosophy, sociology and psychology of law, violence and dominance, sexual selection, victimology and jurisprudence and anyone concerned with modal, possibility and decision-making theories.