Confucianism and Reflexive Modernity offers an excellent example of a dialogue between East and West by linking post-Confucian developments in East Asia to a Western idea of reflexive modernity originally proposed by Ulrich Beck, Anthony Giddens, and Scott Lash in 1994. The author makes a sharp confrontation with the paradigm of Asian Value Debate led by Lee Kwan-Yew and defends a balance between individual empowerment and flourishing community for human rights, basically in line with Juergen Habermas, but in the context of global risk society, particularly from an enlightened perspective of Confucianism. The book is distinguished by sophisticated theoretical reflection, comparative reasoning, and solid empirical argument concerning Asian identity in transformation and the aspects of reflexive modernity in East Asia.
Sang-Jin Han, Professor Emeritus of Sociology at Seoul National University, taught at Peking University and Columbia University (New York) as Visiting Professor and published Divided Nations and Transitional Justice (Paradigm Publisher, 2012), Beyond Risk Society (SNU Press, 2017), Asian Tradition and Cosmopolitan Politics (Lexington Books, 2018).
âThis book proposes something new and interesting: a reflexive understanding of Confucianism that could offer fresh perspectives on human rights and which could therefore also address the global risk society in which we live.â â Gregory Bracken, in: newbooks.asia [Full review]
Preface: Reflection on Paradoxical Modernity Acknowledgements List of Figures and Tables
1 Asian Identity in Transformation
â1âConceptual Clarification
â2âEconomic Dimension of Identity Transformation
â3âThe Perception of Risk Society and Identity Transformation
â4âConfucian Normative Potentialities for the Future
â5âConcluding Remarks
2 Post-Confucian Development beyond the Asian Values Debate
â1âPost-Coloniality in the Global South and East Asia
â2âJapan and Korea Compared
â3âDifferent Traditions and Interpretations of Confucianism
â4âWhere Does East Asia Stand?
â5âLee Kuan Yewâs Confucian Governance Model
â6âCritical Evaluation
â7âPost-Traditional Interpretation of Confucianism
3 The Confucian Contribution to Human Rights
â1âMethodological Inquires
â2âThe Human Rights Debate and Confucianism
â3âA Balanced Confucian Approach to Human Rights
â4âThe Korean Trajectories of a Post-Confucian Development
â5âZhongyong Revisited
â6âToward Overlapping Consensus
4 Main Issues of Human Rights in the Context of East Asian Development
â1âEconomic Development and Human Rights
â2âPolitical Democratization and Human Rights
â3âEast Asian Culture and Human Rights
â4âConcluding Remarks
5 Individual Freedom and Flourishing Community:Â Searching for a Balance
â1âWhat Is a Human Rights Community?
â2âThe Two Dimensions of a Human Rights Community
â3âThree Relationships
â4âSocial Construction of Justice and Human Rights
â5âHuman Rights Community and Asian Culture
â6âHow to Read Chinese Discourses on Human Rights
â7âSchool as a Human Rights Community
â8âThe Experiences of Human Rights Cities
â9âConcluding Remarks
6 The Confucian Norm of Minben and the Self-Rule by Citizens of Gwangju:Â A Participatory Human Rights Community
â1âConfucian Trajectory One:Â Authoritarian Approach to Community
â2âConfucian Trajectory Two:Â Participatory Normative Approach
â3âPost-Confucian Approach to Self-Determination in Gwangju
â4âThree Puzzles of the Gwangju Uprising
â5âCommunitarian Self-Rule as Human Rights
7 A Universal but Non-Hegemonic Approach to Human Rights in International Politics
â1âCosmopolitan Imagination of Differences and Diversities
â2âAsian Values Debate and China
â3âTianxiaism Reconsidered
â4âZhao Tingyangâs Theory of the Tianxia System
â5âChinese Non-Hegemonic Approach to Human Rights
â6âCosmopolitan Exploration for China
8 Intercultural Dialogue and Human Rights in North Korea
â1âObjective and Presuppositions
â2âTwo Methodological Clarifications
â3âThree Steps towards Intercultural Dialogue
ââ3.1âWhy Theoretical Innovation?
ââ3.2âWhy Communitarian?
â4âThree Types of Disputes over Human Rights
â5âToward Over-Lapping Consensus
â6âChina and North Koreaâs Two Human Rights Claims
â7âA New Quest for Universalism in China
â8âFirst Intermediary Reflection
â9âThree Modes of Relationships
â10âSecond Intermediary Reflection
â11âNational Community and Human Rights
â12âConcluding Remarks
9 Risk Society and Confucian Reflexive Modernity
â1âCultural Transformation and Reflexive Modernity
â2âHow to Manage a Risk Society?
â3âEmpirical Dimensions of Reflexivity in East Asia
â4âHumanity-Oriented Confucianism and Reflexive Modernity
â5âConcluding Remarks
10 Human Catastrophe and the Struggle for Recognition
â1âConcept of Struggle for Recognition
â2âConcepts of Popular Sovereignty
â3âThe Gwangju Struggle from a Perspective of Struggle for Recognition
ââ3.1âThe Rhetorical Strategy of the Authorities
ââ3.2âTestimony of Gwangju Citizens
ââ3.3âThe Gwangju Struggle and the U.S.
â4âCommunal Autonomy and Popular Sovereignty
ââ4.1âGwangju in May 1980
ââ4.2âPublic Assembly and Discussion
ââ4.3âCare Ethic and Civil Solidarity
â5âConcluding Remarks
11 Global Risks and East Asia:Â A Research Program
â1âThe Western Context of Research
â2âWhy East Asia Should be Studied
â3âThe South Korean Experience
â4âGlobal Risks with East Asian Sensitivity
â5âFrom Classification to Explanation
â6âReflexive Modernization
â7âConcluding Remarks
Conclusion: Toward a Reflexive Sociology
â1âA Short History
â2âReflexive Sociology in the Context of East Asian Development
â3âThe Main Actor for Reflexive Modernity and Confucianism
â4âThe Formation of the Public Citizens
â5âThe Public Citizens as the Backbone of Civil Society
â6âPublic Citizens in East Asia
Appendix:Â Interview Texts
Interviews with Anthony Giddens
âFrom Tradition to Reflexive Modernization
âThird Way Politics
âNew Global Transformation Trends and the Future of Modernity
Interviews with Scott Lash
âFrom Reflexive Sociology to Aesthetic Reflexivity
âThe Future of Global Capitalism from the Perspective of Confucianism and Digital Technology:Â My View of China
Interview with Tu Weiming
âCan Confucianism in the 21st Century Be a New Alternative?
Interview with Ulrich Beck
âHow to Live in Global Risk Society