Save

Prophecy in Plutarch and Philo of Alexandria

In: Journal for the Study of Judaism
Author:
Matthew J. Klem University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN USA

Search for other papers by Matthew J. Klem in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-3051
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

David Winston distinguishes two types of Mosaic prophecy in Philo’s De vita Mosis, noetic and ecstatic. Noetic prophecy, which corresponds to Moses’s delivery of the special laws, is active and rational. Ecstatic prophecy, which corresponds to Moses’s predictive prophecies, is passive and irrational, though while some Greek authors view ecstasy in terms of a total possession by the god, Philo takes a more moderate view that can also be found in Plutarch. Winston’s appeal to Plutarch is the basis of this article. It explores ecstasy in Plutarch’s two dialogues on the Pythian oracle and applies Plutarch’s categories to Mosaic prophecy in De vita Mosis. In light of Plutarch’s discussion, noetic prophecy is actually passive, and ecstatic prophecy is actually active.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 752 224 17
Full Text Views 89 43 4
PDF Views & Downloads 393 86 10