Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Post-Critical Beliefs and Religious Reflection: Religious Openness Hypothesis in Iranian University and Islamic Seminary Students
in Journal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Nima Ghorbani in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by P. J. Watson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Zahra Sarmast in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Zhuo Job Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Negative relationships between Post-Critical Beliefs in Iran imply that Muslim perspectives are closed-minded, but positive correlations between Religious Reflection factors point instead toward a Muslim open-mindedness. The hypothesis of this study was that this contrast reveals the Post-Critical Belief of Symbolism to be a questionable index of Muslim open-mindedness. Iranian university students and Islamic seminarians (N = 296) responded to Post-Critical Beliefs, Religious Reflection, Religious Orientation, Quest, Rumination-Reflection, and Satisfaction with Life measures. The “openness” of Symbolism correlated negatively with the “openness” of Intellect Oriented Reflection. Other relationships broadly documented Muslim potentials for openness. Evidence of open-mindedness also appeared in contrasts between university students and Islamic seminarians. These results argued against Symbolism as a culturally sensitive measure of Muslim open-mindedness and supported the claim of the Religious Openness Hypothesis that traditional religions have at least some potentials for openness that can be obscured by contextual influences.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
-
Abu-Raiya, H. (2017). A critique from within: Some important research issues that psychologists of religion and spirituality should further work on. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 20, 544-551. doi:10.1080/13674676.2017.1377945.
-
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
-
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113-133. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5.
-
Asad, T. Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
-
Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Demmrich, S., Atmaca, S., & Dinç, C. (2017). Body image and religiosity among veiled and non-veiled Turkish women. Journal of Empirical Theology, 30, 127-147. doi:10.1163/15709256-12341359.
-
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
-
Dover, H., Miner, M., & Dowson, M. (2007). The nature and structure of Muslim religious reflection. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2, 189-210. doi:10.1080/ 15564900701614858.
-
Duriez, B., Soenens, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2005). Introducing the shortened Post-Critical Belief Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 851-857. doi:10.1016/ j.paid.2004.06.009.
-
Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1897).
-
Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Amirbeigi, M., & Chen Z. J. (2016). Religious schema within a Muslim ideological surround: Religious and psychological adjustment in Iran. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 38, 253-277. doi:10.1163/15736121-12341327.
-
Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Chen, Z., & Dover, H. (2013). Varieties of openness in Tehran and Qom: Psychological and religious parallels of faith and intellect oriented Islamic religious reflection. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 16, 123-137. doi:10.1080/13674676.2011.647809.
-
Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Geranmayepour, S., & Chen, Z. (2014). Measuring Muslim spirituality: Relationships of Muslim experiential religiousness with religious and psychological adjustment in Iran. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 8, 77-94. doi:10.3998/jmmh.10381607.0008.105.
-
Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., & Khan, Z. (2007). Theoretical, empirical, and potential ideological dimensions of using Western conceptualizations to measure Muslim religious commitments. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2, 113-131. doi:10.1080/15564900701613041.
-
Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. H., Kashanaki, H., & Chen Z. J. (2017). Diversity and complexity of religion and spirituality in Iran: Relationships with self-compassion and self-forgiveness. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 27, 157-171. doi:10.1080/10508619.2017.1340100.
-
Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Shamohammadi, K., & Cunningham, C. J. L. (2009). Post-critical beliefs in Iran: Predicting religious and psychological functioning. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 20, 151-194. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004175624.i-334.50.
-
Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., & Weathington, B. L. (2009). Mindfulness in Iran and the United States: Cross-cultural structural complexity and parallel relationships with psychological adjustment. Current Psychology, 28, 211-224. doi:10.1007/s12144-009-9060-3.
-
Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348-354. doi:10.2307/1386745.
-
Jones, A. E., & Elliott, M. (2017). Examining social desirability in measures of religion and spirituality using the bogus pipeline. Review of Religious Research, 59, 47-64. doi:10.1007/s13644-13016-0261-0266.
-
Kamble, S. V., Watson, P. J., Duggi, D. B., & Chen, Z. J. (In press). Fundamentalism within an Indian ideological surround: commitment to religious tradition predicts hindu openness. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion.
-
Kamble, S. V., Watson, P. J., Marigoudar, S., & Chen, Z. (2014). Varieties of openness and religious commitment in India: Relationships of attitudes toward Hinduism, Hindu religious reflection, and religious schema. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 36, 172-198. doi:10.1163/15736121-12341283.
-
Khan, Z. H., Watson, P. J., & Chen, Z. J. (2017). Religious reflection in Pakistan: Further evidence of integration between Muslim faith and intellect. Journal of Beliefs and Values. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13617672.2017.129272.
-
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
-
MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three rival versions of moral enquiry. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
-
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888. doi:10.1037// 0022-006x.51.6.882.
-
Streib, H., Hood, R. W., Jr., & Klein, C. (2010). The Religious Schema Scale: Construction and initial validation of a quantitative measure for religious styles. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 151-172. doi:10.1080/10508619.2010.481223.
-
Tekke, M., Watson, P. J., İsmail, N. A., & Chen, Z. J. (2015). Muslim religious openness and ilm: Relationships with Islamic religious reflection, religious schema, and religious commitments in Malaysia. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 37, 295-320. doi:10.1163/15736121-12341313.
-
Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five- factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284-304. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.76.2.284.
-
Uziel, L. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 243-262. doi:10.1177/1745691610369465.
-
Watson, P. J., Chen, Z., Ghorbani, N., & Vartanian, M. (2015). Religious openness hypothesis: I. Religious reflection, schemas, and orientations within religious fundamentalist and biblical foundationalist ideological surrounds. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 34, 99-113.
-
Watson, P. J., Chen, Z., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (2011). Biblical foundationalism and religious reflection: Polarization of faith and intellect oriented epistemologies within a Christian ideological surround. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 39, 111-121.
-
Watson, P. J., Chen, Z. J., & Morris, R. J. (In press). Sanctification of learning and religious openness: Contrasts across religious fundamentalist and biblical foundationalist ideological surrounds. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion.
-
Watson, P. J., Chen, Z., Morris, R. J., & Stephenson, E. (2015). Religious Openness Hypothesis: III. Defense against secularism within fundamentalist and biblical foundationalist ideological surrounds. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 34, 125-140.
-
Watson, P. J., Ghorbani, N., Vartanian, M., & Chen, Z. (2015). Religious openness hypothesis: II. Religious reflection and orientations, mystical experience, and psychological openness of Christians in Iran. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 34, 114-124.
-
Watson, P. J., Milliron, J. T., & Morris, R. J. (1995). Social desirability scales and theories of suicide: Correlations with alienation and self-consciousness. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 701-711. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00003-o.
-
Watson, P. J., Morris, R. J., Foster, J. E., & Hood, R. W. (1986). Religiosity and social desirability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 25, 215-232. doi:10.2307/1385478.
-
Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary. (Second ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 718 | 142 | 12 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 221 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 70 | 6 | 0 |
Post-Critical Beliefs and Religious Reflection: Religious Openness Hypothesis in Iranian University and Islamic Seminary Students
in Journal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Nima Ghorbani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P. J. Watson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zahra Sarmast in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhuo Job Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Negative relationships between Post-Critical Beliefs in Iran imply that Muslim perspectives are closed-minded, but positive correlations between Religious Reflection factors point instead toward a Muslim open-mindedness. The hypothesis of this study was that this contrast reveals the Post-Critical Belief of Symbolism to be a questionable index of Muslim open-mindedness. Iranian university students and Islamic seminarians (N = 296) responded to Post-Critical Beliefs, Religious Reflection, Religious Orientation, Quest, Rumination-Reflection, and Satisfaction with Life measures. The “openness” of Symbolism correlated negatively with the “openness” of Intellect Oriented Reflection. Other relationships broadly documented Muslim potentials for openness. Evidence of open-mindedness also appeared in contrasts between university students and Islamic seminarians. These results argued against Symbolism as a culturally sensitive measure of Muslim open-mindedness and supported the claim of the Religious Openness Hypothesis that traditional religions have at least some potentials for openness that can be obscured by contextual influences.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 718 | 142 | 12 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 221 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 70 | 6 | 0 |
