Alexander, Philip. “Retelling the Old Testament.” Pages 99–121 in It Is Written: Scripture Citing Scripture: Essays in Honour of Barnabas Lindars, SSF. Edited by D.A. Carson and H.G.M. Williamson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Alexander, Philip. “Retelling the Old Testament.” Pages 99–121 in It Is Written: Scripture Citing Scripture: Essays in Honour of Barnabas Lindars, SSF. Edited by D.A. Carson and H.G.M. Williamson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Allen, Garrick. The Book of Revelation and Early Jewish Textual Culture. SNTSMS 168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Allen, Garrick. The Book of Revelation and Early Jewish Textual Culture. SNTSMS 168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Avioz, Michael. “Abraham in Josephus’ Writings.” Pages 93–108 in Abraham in Jewish and Early Christian Literature. Edited by Sean Adams and Zanne Domoney-Lyttle. LSTS 93. Leiden: Brill, 2019.

Avioz, Michael. “Abraham in Josephus’ Writings.” Pages 93–108 in Abraham in Jewish and Early Christian Literature. Edited by Sean Adams and Zanne Domoney-Lyttle. LSTS 93. Leiden: Brill, 2019.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Baier, Thomas. “Quintilian’s Approach to Literary History via imitatio and utilitas.” Pages 47–64 in The Literary Genres in the Flavian Age: Canons, Transformations, Reception. Edited by Federica Bessone and Marco Fucecchi. Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volume 51. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.

Baier, Thomas. “Quintilian’s Approach to Literary History via imitatio and utilitas.” Pages 47–64 in The Literary Genres in the Flavian Age: Canons, Transformations, Reception. Edited by Federica Bessone and Marco Fucecchi. Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volume 51. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Bautch, Richard. “Rewriting Authoritative Traditions in Chronicles, Ezra-Nehemiah and Jubilees.” HBAI 14 (2025): 170–86.

Bautch, Richard. “Rewriting Authoritative Traditions in Chronicles, Ezra-Nehemiah and Jubilees.” HBAI 14 (2025): 170–86.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Benjamin, Walter. “On the Mimetic Faculty.” Pages 333–335 in Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writing. Edited by Peter Demetz. New York: Schocken, 1995.

Benjamin, Walter. “On the Mimetic Faculty.” Pages 333–335 in Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writing. Edited by Peter Demetz. New York: Schocken, 1995.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Blenkinsopp, Joseph. “Prophecy and Priesthood in Josephus,” JJS 25.2 (1974): 239–62.

Blenkinsopp, Joseph. “Prophecy and Priesthood in Josephus,” JJS 25.2 (1974): 239–62.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Borgen, Peder. Philo of Alexandra – An Exegete for His Time. NovTSup 86. Leiden: Brill, 1997.

Borgen, Peder. Philo of Alexandra – An Exegete for His Time. NovTSup 86. Leiden: Brill, 1997.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Børtnes, Jostein. “Canon Formation and Canon Interpretation.” Pages 189–216 in Canon and Canonicity: The Formation and Use of Scripture. Edited by Einar Thomassen. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, 2010.

Børtnes, Jostein. “Canon Formation and Canon Interpretation.” Pages 189–216 in Canon and Canonicity: The Formation and Use of Scripture. Edited by Einar Thomassen. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, 2010.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Brooke, George. “Rewritten Bible.” Pages 777–81 in vol. 2 of The Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by Lawrence Schiffman and James VanderKam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Brooke, George. “Rewritten Bible.” Pages 777–81 in vol. 2 of The Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by Lawrence Schiffman and James VanderKam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Burrow, Colin. Imitating Authors: Plato to Futurity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Burrow, Colin. Imitating Authors: Plato to Futurity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Campbell, Jonathan. “Rewritten Bible: A Terminological Reassessment.” Pages 49–82 in Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? A Last Dialogue with Geza Vermes. Edited by József Zsengellér. JSJSup 166. Leiden: Brill, 2014.

Campbell, Jonathan. “Rewritten Bible: A Terminological Reassessment.” Pages 49–82 in Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? A Last Dialogue with Geza Vermes. Edited by József Zsengellér. JSJSup 166. Leiden: Brill, 2014.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Conte, Gian. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and other Latin Poets. Edited by Charles Segal. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.

Conte, Gian. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and other Latin Poets. Edited by Charles Segal. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Corsar, Elizabeth. “John’s Reworking of Mark: A Study in Light of Ancient Compositional Practice.” Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Edinburgh, 2019.

Corsar, Elizabeth. “John’s Reworking of Mark: A Study in Light of Ancient Compositional Practice.” Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Edinburgh, 2019.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Crawford, Sidnie White. Rewriting Scripture in Second Temple Times. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008.

Crawford, Sidnie White. Rewriting Scripture in Second Temple Times. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Crawford, Sidnie White. “The Reworked Pentateuch.” Pages 570–85 in vol. 1 of Early Jewish Literature: An Anthology. Edited by Archie Wright, Brad Embry, and Ronald Herms. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018.

Crawford, Sidnie White. “The Reworked Pentateuch.” Pages 570–85 in vol. 1 of Early Jewish Literature: An Anthology. Edited by Archie Wright, Brad Embry, and Ronald Herms. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dejong, David. A Prophet Like Moses (Deut 18:15, 18): The Origin, History, and Influence of the Mosaic Prophetic Succession. JSJSup 205. Leiden: Brill, 2022.

Dejong, David. A Prophet Like Moses (Deut 18:15, 18): The Origin, History, and Influence of the Mosaic Prophetic Succession. JSJSup 205. Leiden: Brill, 2022.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Docherty, Susan. “Joseph and Aseneth: Rewritten Bible or Narrative Expansion.” JSJ 35.1 (2004): 27–48.

Docherty, Susan. “Joseph and Aseneth: Rewritten Bible or Narrative Expansion.” JSJ 35.1 (2004): 27–48.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Eve, Eric. Relating the Gospels: Imitation, Memory, and the Farrer Hypothesis. LNTS 592. London: T&T Clark, 2021.

Eve, Eric. Relating the Gospels: Imitation, Memory, and the Farrer Hypothesis. LNTS 592. London: T&T Clark, 2021.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Feldman, Louis. Studies in Josephus’ Rewritten Bible. JSJSup 58. Leiden: Brill, 1998.

Feldman, Louis. Studies in Josephus’ Rewritten Bible. JSJSup 58. Leiden: Brill, 1998.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Friedberg, Albert and Juni Hoppe. “Deuteronomy 14.3–21: An Early Exemplar of Rewritten Scripture?” JSOT 45.3 (2021): 422–57.

Friedberg, Albert and Juni Hoppe. “Deuteronomy 14.3–21: An Early Exemplar of Rewritten Scripture?” JSOT 45.3 (2021): 422–57.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Friis, Martin. Image and Imitation: Josephus’ Antiquities 1–11 and Greco-Roman Historiography. WUNT 2/472. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.

Friis, Martin. Image and Imitation: Josephus’ Antiquities 1–11 and Greco-Roman Historiography. WUNT 2/472. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Gerber, Edward. The Scriptural Tale in the Fourth Gospel: With Particular Reference to the Prologue and a Syncretic (Oral and Written) Poetics. BibInt 147. Leiden: Brill, 2016.

Gerber, Edward. The Scriptural Tale in the Fourth Gospel: With Particular Reference to the Prologue and a Syncretic (Oral and Written) Poetics. BibInt 147. Leiden: Brill, 2016.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Ghormley, Justus. Scribes Writing Scripture: Doublets, Textual Divination, and the Formation of the Book of Jeremiah. VTSup 189. Leiden: Brill, 2021.

Ghormley, Justus. Scribes Writing Scripture: Doublets, Textual Divination, and the Formation of the Book of Jeremiah. VTSup 189. Leiden: Brill, 2021.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Gordley, Matthew. “Psalms of Solomon as Solomonic Discourse: The Nature and Function of Attribution to Solomon in a Pseudonymous Psalm Collection.” JSP 25.1 (2015): 52–88.

Gordley, Matthew. “Psalms of Solomon as Solomonic Discourse: The Nature and Function of Attribution to Solomon in a Pseudonymous Psalm Collection.” JSP 25.1 (2015): 52–88.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Green, Gene. “Second Peter’s Use of Jude: Imitatio and the Sociology of Early Christianity.” Pages 1–25 in Reading Second Peter with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter. Edited by Robert Webb and Duane Watson. LNTS 382. London: T&T Clark, 2010.

Green, Gene. “Second Peter’s Use of Jude: Imitatio and the Sociology of Early Christianity.” Pages 1–25 in Reading Second Peter with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter. Edited by Robert Webb and Duane Watson. LNTS 382. London: T&T Clark, 2010.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Harrington, Daniel. “The Bible Rewritten (Narratives).” Pages 239–47 in Early Judaism and its Modern Interpreters. Edited by Robert Kraft and George Nickelsburg. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1986.

Harrington, Daniel. “The Bible Rewritten (Narratives).” Pages 239–47 in Early Judaism and its Modern Interpreters. Edited by Robert Kraft and George Nickelsburg. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1986.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Hartog, Pieter. “Homeric Paraphrase and the Study of Scriptures at Qumran.” Pages 71–94 in The Dead Sea Scrolls in the Context of Hellenistic Judea: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies (Aberdeen, 5–8 August, 2019). Edited by Pieter Hartog and Andrew Perrin. STDJ 142. Leiden: Brill, 2023.

Hartog, Pieter. “Homeric Paraphrase and the Study of Scriptures at Qumran.” Pages 71–94 in The Dead Sea Scrolls in the Context of Hellenistic Judea: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies (Aberdeen, 5–8 August, 2019). Edited by Pieter Hartog and Andrew Perrin. STDJ 142. Leiden: Brill, 2023.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Hay, David. “Philo’s View of Himself as an Exegete: Inspired, But Not Authoritative.” SPhiloA 3 (1991): 40–52.

Hay, David. “Philo’s View of Himself as an Exegete: Inspired, But Not Authoritative.” SPhiloA 3 (1991): 40–52.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Hofmann, Norbert. Die Assumptio Mosis: Studien zur Rezeption massgültiger Überlieferung. JSJSup 67. Leiden: Brill, 2000.

Hofmann, Norbert. Die Assumptio Mosis: Studien zur Rezeption massgültiger Überlieferung. JSJSup 67. Leiden: Brill, 2000.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Inowlocki, Sabrina. “Neither Adding nor Omitting Anything: Josephus’ Promise not to Modify the Scriptures in a Greek and Latin Context.” JJS 56.1 (2005): 48–65.

Inowlocki, Sabrina. “Neither Adding nor Omitting Anything: Josephus’ Promise not to Modify the Scriptures in a Greek and Latin Context.” JJS 56.1 (2005): 48–65.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Instone-Brewer, David. Techniques and Assumptions in Jewish Exegesis Before 70CE. TSAJ 30. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992.

Instone-Brewer, David. Techniques and Assumptions in Jewish Exegesis Before 70CE. TSAJ 30. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Jassen, Alex. Mediating the Divine: Prophecy and Revelation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Second Temple Judaism. STDJ 68. Leiden: Brill, 2007.

Jassen, Alex. Mediating the Divine: Prophecy and Revelation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Second Temple Judaism. STDJ 68. Leiden: Brill, 2007.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Keeline, Tom. “Vergil and Homer.” Pages 603–605 in The Cambridge Guide to Homer. Edited by Corinne Pache. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Keeline, Tom. “Vergil and Homer.” Pages 603–605 in The Cambridge Guide to Homer. Edited by Corinne Pache. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Kirk, Alan. “The Scribe as Tradent,” Pages 97–115 in Scribal Practices and Social Structures among Jesus Adherents: Essays in Honour of John S. Kloppenborg. Edited by William Arnal, Richard Ascough, Robert Derrenbacker, and Philip Harland. BETL 285. Leuven: Peeters, 2016.

Kirk, Alan. “The Scribe as Tradent,” Pages 97–115 in Scribal Practices and Social Structures among Jesus Adherents: Essays in Honour of John S. Kloppenborg. Edited by William Arnal, Richard Ascough, Robert Derrenbacker, and Philip Harland. BETL 285. Leuven: Peeters, 2016.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Kirk, Alan. Q in Matthew: Ancient Media, Memory, and Early Scribal Transmission of the Jesus Tradition. LNTS 564. London: T&T Clark, 2019.

Kirk, Alan. Q in Matthew: Ancient Media, Memory, and Early Scribal Transmission of the Jesus Tradition. LNTS 564. London: T&T Clark, 2019.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Knauer, Georg Nicolaus. “Vergil’s Aeneid and Homer.” GRBS 5.2 (1964): 61–84.

Knauer, Georg Nicolaus. “Vergil’s Aeneid and Homer.” GRBS 5.2 (1964): 61–84.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Knoppers, Gary. Prophets, Priests, and Promises: Essays on the Deuteronomistic History, Chronicles, and Ezra-Nehemiah. VTSup 186. Leiden: Brill, 2021.

Knoppers, Gary. Prophets, Priests, and Promises: Essays on the Deuteronomistic History, Chronicles, and Ezra-Nehemiah. VTSup 186. Leiden: Brill, 2021.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Korpman, Matthew. “Reevaluating the Category of Rewritten Scripture: Jubilees, the Testament Job, and the Hierarchy of Authority.” JSJ 56 (2025): 1–21.

Korpman, Matthew. “Reevaluating the Category of Rewritten Scripture: Jubilees, the Testament Job, and the Hierarchy of Authority.” JSJ 56 (2025): 1–21.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Kynes, Will. An Obituary for ‘Wisdom Literature’: The Birth, Death, and Intertextual Reintegration of a Biblical Corpus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Kynes, Will. An Obituary for ‘Wisdom Literature’: The Birth, Death, and Intertextual Reintegration of a Biblical Corpus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Levinson, Bernard. Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Levinson, Bernard. Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Levinson, Bernard. Legal Revision and Religious Renewal in Ancient Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Levinson, Bernard. Legal Revision and Religious Renewal in Ancient Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

MacDonald, Dennis. “Luke’s Antetextuality in Light of Ancient Rhetorical Education.” Pages 155–63 in Ancient Education and Early Christianity. Edited by Matthew Hauge and Andrew Pitts. LNTS 533. London: T&T Clark, 2018.

MacDonald, Dennis. “Luke’s Antetextuality in Light of Ancient Rhetorical Education.” Pages 155–63 in Ancient Education and Early Christianity. Edited by Matthew Hauge and Andrew Pitts. LNTS 533. London: T&T Clark, 2018.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

MacDonald, Dennis “Teaching Mimesis as a Criterion for Textual Criticism: Cases from the Testament of Abraham and the Gospel of Nicodemus.” Pages 241–50 in Reading and Teaching Ancient Fiction: Jewish, Christian, and Greco-Roman Narratives. Edited by Sara Johnson, Rubén Dupertuis, and Christine Shea. WGRWSup 11. Atlanta: SBL, 2018.

MacDonald, Dennis “Teaching Mimesis as a Criterion for Textual Criticism: Cases from the Testament of Abraham and the Gospel of Nicodemus.” Pages 241–50 in Reading and Teaching Ancient Fiction: Jewish, Christian, and Greco-Roman Narratives. Edited by Sara Johnson, Rubén Dupertuis, and Christine Shea. WGRWSup 11. Atlanta: SBL, 2018.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Machiela, Daniel. “Once More, with Feeling: Rewritten Scripture in Ancient Judaism – A Review of Recent Developments.” JJS 61.2 (2010): 308–20.

Machiela, Daniel. “Once More, with Feeling: Rewritten Scripture in Ancient Judaism – A Review of Recent Developments.” JJS 61.2 (2010): 308–20.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Mack, Burton. “Under the Shadow of Moses: Authorship and Authority in Hellenistic Judaism.” Pages 299–318 in Society of Biblical Literature 1982 Seminar Papers. Edited by Kent Richards. SBLSPS 21. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1983.

Mack, Burton. “Under the Shadow of Moses: Authorship and Authority in Hellenistic Judaism.” Pages 299–318 in Society of Biblical Literature 1982 Seminar Papers. Edited by Kent Richards. SBLSPS 21. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1983.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Majewski, Marcin. “The Phenomenon of Rewriting Scripture in Late Second Temple Judaism: Some Methodological Reflections on the So-Called ‘Rewritten Bible’ Category.” Verbum Vitae 39.4 (2021): 1311–334.

Majewski, Marcin. “The Phenomenon of Rewriting Scripture in Late Second Temple Judaism: Some Methodological Reflections on the So-Called ‘Rewritten Bible’ Category.” Verbum Vitae 39.4 (2021): 1311–334.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Marcos, Natalio Fernández. “Rewritten Bible or Imitatio? The Vestments of the High Priest.” Pages 321–36 in Studies in the Hebrew Bible, Qumran, and the Septuagint Presented to Eugene Ulrich. Edited by Peter Flint, Emanuel Tov and James Vanderkam. VTSupp 101. Leiden: Brill, 2006.

Marcos, Natalio Fernández. “Rewritten Bible or Imitatio? The Vestments of the High Priest.” Pages 321–36 in Studies in the Hebrew Bible, Qumran, and the Septuagint Presented to Eugene Ulrich. Edited by Peter Flint, Emanuel Tov and James Vanderkam. VTSupp 101. Leiden: Brill, 2006.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Marincola, John. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Marincola, John. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Mattison, Kevin. “Hypertextuality Theory and Interpretation in and of the Pentateuch.” ZAW 135.1 (2023): 2–15.

Mattison, Kevin. “Hypertextuality Theory and Interpretation in and of the Pentateuch.” ZAW 135.1 (2023): 2–15.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

McAdon, Brad. Rhetorical Mimesis and the Mitigation of Early Christian Conflicts: Examining the Influence Greco-Roman Mimesis May Have in the Composition of Matthew, Luke, and Acts. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2018.

McAdon, Brad. Rhetorical Mimesis and the Mitigation of Early Christian Conflicts: Examining the Influence Greco-Roman Mimesis May Have in the Composition of Matthew, Luke, and Acts. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2018.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

McElduff, Siobhan. Roman Theories of Translation: Surpassing the Source. New York: Routledge, 2017.

McElduff, Siobhan. Roman Theories of Translation: Surpassing the Source. New York: Routledge, 2017.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Morgan, Teresa. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Morgan, Teresa. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Mroczek, Eva. “Moses, David, and Scribal Revelation: Preservation and Renewal in Second Temple Jewish Textual Traditions.” Pages 91–115 in The Significance of Sinai: Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity. Edited by George Brooke, Hindy Najman, and Loren Stuckenbruck. TBN 12. Leiden: Brill, 2008.

Mroczek, Eva. “Moses, David, and Scribal Revelation: Preservation and Renewal in Second Temple Jewish Textual Traditions.” Pages 91–115 in The Significance of Sinai: Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity. Edited by George Brooke, Hindy Najman, and Loren Stuckenbruck. TBN 12. Leiden: Brill, 2008.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Mroczek, Eva. The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Mroczek, Eva. The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Najman, Hindy. Seconding Sinai: The Development of Mosaic Discourse in Second Temple Judaism. JSJSup 77. Leiden: Brill, 2003.

Najman, Hindy. Seconding Sinai: The Development of Mosaic Discourse in Second Temple Judaism. JSJSup 77. Leiden: Brill, 2003.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Najman, Hindy. Past Renewals: Interpretative Authority, Renewed Revelation and the Quest for Perfection in Jewish Antiquity. JSJSup 53. Leiden: Brill, 2010.

Najman, Hindy. Past Renewals: Interpretative Authority, Renewed Revelation and the Quest for Perfection in Jewish Antiquity. JSJSup 53. Leiden: Brill, 2010.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Najman, Hindy. Scriptural Vitality: Rethinking Philology and Hermeneutics. The Bible and the Humanities 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.

Najman, Hindy. Scriptural Vitality: Rethinking Philology and Hermeneutics. The Bible and the Humanities 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Nihan, Christophe. “Textual Fluidity and Rewriting in Parallel Traditions.” JAJ 4 (2013): 186–209.

Nihan, Christophe. “Textual Fluidity and Rewriting in Parallel Traditions.” JAJ 4 (2013): 186–209.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

O’Leary, Anne. Matthew’s Judaization of Mark: Examined in the Context of the Use of Sources in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. LNTS 323. London: T&T Clark, 2006.

O’Leary, Anne. Matthew’s Judaization of Mark: Examined in the Context of the Use of Sources in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. LNTS 323. London: T&T Clark, 2006.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Pelling, Christopher. Literary Texts and the Greek Historian. New York: Routledge, 1999.

Pelling, Christopher. Literary Texts and the Greek Historian. New York: Routledge, 1999.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Potolski, Matthew. Mimesis. The New Critical Idiom. London: Routledge, 2006.

Potolski, Matthew. Mimesis. The New Critical Idiom. London: Routledge, 2006.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Potter, Jonathan. Rewritten Gospel: The Composition of Luke and Rewritten Scripture. BZNW 267. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2025.

Potter, Jonathan. Rewritten Gospel: The Composition of Luke and Rewritten Scripture. BZNW 267. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2025.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Punt, Jeremy. “What Are Authoritative Scriptures?” R&T 26 (2019): 52–71.

Punt, Jeremy. “What Are Authoritative Scriptures?” R&T 26 (2019): 52–71.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Reed, Annette Yoshiko. Demons, Angels, and Writing in Ancient Judaism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Reed, Annette Yoshiko. Demons, Angels, and Writing in Ancient Judaism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Rodgers, Zuleika. “Josephus’ ‘Theokratia’ and Mosaic Discourse: The Actualization of the Revelation at Sinai.” Pages 129–48 in The Significance of Sinai: Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity. Edited by George Brooke, Hindy Najman, and Loren Stuckenbruck. TBN 12. Leiden: Brill, 2008.

Rodgers, Zuleika. “Josephus’ ‘Theokratia’ and Mosaic Discourse: The Actualization of the Revelation at Sinai.” Pages 129–48 in The Significance of Sinai: Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity. Edited by George Brooke, Hindy Najman, and Loren Stuckenbruck. TBN 12. Leiden: Brill, 2008.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Russell, D.A. “De Imitatione.” Pages 1–16 in Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Edited by David West and Tony Woodman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Russell, D.A. “De Imitatione.” Pages 1–16 in Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Edited by David West and Tony Woodman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Russell, D.A. Criticism in Antiquity. London: Duckworth, 1981.

Russell, D.A. Criticism in Antiquity. London: Duckworth, 1981.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Schippers, A.M. “Dionysius and Quintilian: Imitation and Emulation in Greek and Latin Literary Criticism.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Leiden University, 2019.

Schippers, A.M. “Dionysius and Quintilian: Imitation and Emulation in Greek and Latin Literary Criticism.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Leiden University, 2019.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Segal, Michael. “Between Bible and Rewritten Bible.” Pages 10–28 in Biblical Interpretation at Qumran. Edited by Matthias Henze. Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005.

Segal, Michael. “Between Bible and Rewritten Bible.” Pages 10–28 in Biblical Interpretation at Qumran. Edited by Matthias Henze. Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Seneca (the Younger), Epistles 1–65. Translated by Richard Gummere. LCL 75. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1917.

Seneca (the Younger), Epistles 1–65. Translated by Richard Gummere. LCL 75. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1917.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Simons, Robert. “The Magnificat: Cento, Psalm, or Imitatio?” TynBul 60.1 (2009): 25–46.

Simons, Robert. “The Magnificat: Cento, Psalm, or Imitatio?” TynBul 60.1 (2009): 25–46.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Stackert, Jeffrey. “Before and After Scripture: Narrative Chronology in the Revision of Torah Texts.” JAJ 4 (2013): 168–85.

Stackert, Jeffrey. “Before and After Scripture: Narrative Chronology in the Revision of Torah Texts.” JAJ 4 (2013): 168–85.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Stackert, Jeffrey. Deuteronomy and the Pentateuch. AYBRL. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2022.

Stackert, Jeffrey. Deuteronomy and the Pentateuch. AYBRL. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2022.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Swanson, Dwight. “How Scriptural is Re-Written Bible?” RevQ 21.3 (2004): 407–27.

Swanson, Dwight. “How Scriptural is Re-Written Bible?” RevQ 21.3 (2004): 407–27.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Thompson, Thomas. “>Rewritten Bible< or Reiterative Rhetoric: Examples from Yahweh’s Garden.” Pages 49–64 in Rewriting and Reception in and of the Bible. Edited by Jesper Høgenhaven, Jesper Tang Nielsen, and Heike Omerzu. WUNT 396. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.

Thompson, Thomas. “>Rewritten Bible< or Reiterative Rhetoric: Examples from Yahweh’s Garden.” Pages 49–64 in Rewriting and Reception in and of the Bible. Edited by Jesper Høgenhaven, Jesper Tang Nielsen, and Heike Omerzu. WUNT 396. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Tiňo, Jozef. “The Classification of Rewritten Scripture: A Plea for Retaining the Emic Perspective.” JSJ 49 (2018): 330–49.

Tiňo, Jozef. “The Classification of Rewritten Scripture: A Plea for Retaining the Emic Perspective.” JSJ 49 (2018): 330–49.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Tolonen, Anna-Lisa and Elisa Uusimäki. “Managing the Ancestral Way of Life in the Roman Diaspora: The Mélange of Philosophical and Scriptural Practice in 4Maccabees.” JSJ 48 (2017): 113–41.

Tolonen, Anna-Lisa and Elisa Uusimäki. “Managing the Ancestral Way of Life in the Roman Diaspora: The Mélange of Philosophical and Scriptural Practice in 4Maccabees.” JSJ 48 (2017): 113–41.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Toorn, Karel van der. Scribal Culture and the Making of the Hebrew Bible. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.

Toorn, Karel van der. Scribal Culture and the Making of the Hebrew Bible. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Ulrich, Eugene. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Developmental Composition of the Bible. VTSup 169. Leiden: Brill, 2015.

Ulrich, Eugene. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Developmental Composition of the Bible. VTSup 169. Leiden: Brill, 2015.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Vayntrub, Jacqueline. “Like Father, Like Son: Theorizing Transmission in Biblical Literature.” HBAI 7 (2018): 500–26.

Vayntrub, Jacqueline. “Like Father, Like Son: Theorizing Transmission in Biblical Literature.” HBAI 7 (2018): 500–26.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Whitmarsh, Tim. Beyond the Second Sophistic: Adventures in Greek Postclassicism. Berkley: University of California Press, 2013.

Whitmarsh, Tim. Beyond the Second Sophistic: Adventures in Greek Postclassicism. Berkley: University of California Press, 2013.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Whitton, Christopher. The Art of Imitation in Latin Prose: Pliny’s Epistles/Quintilian in Brief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Whitton, Christopher. The Art of Imitation in Latin Prose: Pliny’s Epistles/Quintilian in Brief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Wiater, Nicolas. The Ideology of Classicism: Language, History, and Identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 105. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.

Wiater, Nicolas. The Ideology of Classicism: Language, History, and Identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 105. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Williams, Catrin. “John’s ‘Rewriting’ of Mark: Some Insights from Ancient Jewish Analogues.” Pages 51–66 in John’s Transformation of Mark. Edited by Eve-Marie Becker, Helen Bond, and Catrin Williams. London: T&T Clark, 2021.

Williams, Catrin. “John’s ‘Rewriting’ of Mark: Some Insights from Ancient Jewish Analogues.” Pages 51–66 in John’s Transformation of Mark. Edited by Eve-Marie Becker, Helen Bond, and Catrin Williams. London: T&T Clark, 2021.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Williamson, H.G.M. “1Esdras as Rewritten Bible.” Pages 237–50 in Was 1Esdras First? An Investigation into the Priority and Nature of 1Esdras. Edited by Lisbeth Fried. AIL 7. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.

Williamson, H.G.M. “1Esdras as Rewritten Bible.” Pages 237–50 in Was 1Esdras First? An Investigation into the Priority and Nature of 1Esdras. Edited by Lisbeth Fried. AIL 7. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Zahn, Molly. Rethinking Rewritten Scripture: Composition and Exegesis in the 4QReworkedPentateuch Manuscripts. STDJ 95. Leiden: Brill, 2011.

Zahn, Molly. Rethinking Rewritten Scripture: Composition and Exegesis in the 4QReworkedPentateuch Manuscripts. STDJ 95. Leiden: Brill, 2011.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Zahn, Molly. “Genre and Rewritten Scripture: A Reassessment.” JBL 131.2 (2012): 271–88.

Zahn, Molly. “Genre and Rewritten Scripture: A Reassessment.” JBL 131.2 (2012): 271–88.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Zahn, Molly. Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism: Scribal Composition and Transmission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Zahn, Molly. Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism: Scribal Composition and Transmission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Zsengellér, József, ed. Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? A Last Dialogue with Geza Vermes. JSJSup 166. Leiden: Brill, 2014.

Zsengellér, József, ed. Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? A Last Dialogue with Geza Vermes. JSJSup 166. Leiden: Brill, 2014.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用