Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
The corpus of texts called “Rewritten Scripture” have long been subject to debate about their categorization. When differentiating between minimalist (form-oriented) and maximalist (process-oriented) schools of thought, distinctions must be made between elements like content, techniques, purpose, and function to determine where these texts belong. This article does not attempt to redefine or reclassify Rewritten Scripture as a phenomenon, but contends with arguments suggesting that Rewritten Scripture is basically equivalent to Greco-Roman imitation (
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
Alexander, Philip. “Retelling the Old Testament.” Pages 99–121 in It Is Written: Scripture Citing Scripture: Essays in Honour of Barnabas Lindars, SSF. Edited by D.A. Carson and H.G.M. Williamson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Allen, Garrick. The Book of Revelation and Early Jewish Textual Culture. SNTSMS 168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Avioz, Michael. “Abraham in Josephus’ Writings.” Pages 93–108 in Abraham in Jewish and Early Christian Literature. Edited by Sean Adams and Zanne Domoney-Lyttle. LSTS 93. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
Baier, Thomas. “Quintilian’s Approach to Literary History via imitatio and utilitas.” Pages 47–64 in The Literary Genres in the Flavian Age: Canons, Transformations, Reception. Edited by Federica Bessone and Marco Fucecchi. Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volume 51. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.
Bautch, Richard. “Rewriting Authoritative Traditions in Chronicles, Ezra-Nehemiah and Jubilees.” HBAI 14 (2025): 170–86.
Benjamin, Walter. “On the Mimetic Faculty.” Pages 333–335 in Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writing. Edited by Peter Demetz. New York: Schocken, 1995.
Blenkinsopp, Joseph. “Prophecy and Priesthood in Josephus,” JJS 25.2 (1974): 239–62.
Borgen, Peder. Philo of Alexandra – An Exegete for His Time. NovTSup 86. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
Børtnes, Jostein. “Canon Formation and Canon Interpretation.” Pages 189–216 in Canon and Canonicity: The Formation and Use of Scripture. Edited by Einar Thomassen. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, 2010.
Brooke, George. “Rewritten Bible.” Pages 777–81 in vol. 2 of The Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by Lawrence Schiffman and James VanderKam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Burrow, Colin. Imitating Authors: Plato to Futurity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Campbell, Jonathan. “Rewritten Bible: A Terminological Reassessment.” Pages 49–82 in Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? A Last Dialogue with Geza Vermes. Edited by József Zsengellér. JSJSup 166. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Conte, Gian. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and other Latin Poets. Edited by Charles Segal. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.
Corsar, Elizabeth. “John’s Reworking of Mark: A Study in Light of Ancient Compositional Practice.” Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Edinburgh, 2019.
Crawford, Sidnie White. Rewriting Scripture in Second Temple Times. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008.
Crawford, Sidnie White. “The Reworked Pentateuch.” Pages 570–85 in vol. 1 of Early Jewish Literature: An Anthology. Edited by Archie Wright, Brad Embry, and Ronald Herms. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018.
Dejong, David. A Prophet Like Moses (Deut 18:15, 18): The Origin, History, and Influence of the Mosaic Prophetic Succession. JSJSup 205. Leiden: Brill, 2022.
Docherty, Susan. “Joseph and Aseneth: Rewritten Bible or Narrative Expansion.” JSJ 35.1 (2004): 27–48.
Eve, Eric. Relating the Gospels: Imitation, Memory, and the Farrer Hypothesis. LNTS 592. London: T&T Clark, 2021.
Feldman, Louis. Studies in Josephus’ Rewritten Bible. JSJSup 58. Leiden: Brill, 1998.
Friedberg, Albert and Juni Hoppe. “Deuteronomy 14.3–21: An Early Exemplar of Rewritten Scripture?” JSOT 45.3 (2021): 422–57.
Friis, Martin. Image and Imitation: Josephus’ Antiquities 1–11 and Greco-Roman Historiography. WUNT 2/472. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.
Gerber, Edward. The Scriptural Tale in the Fourth Gospel: With Particular Reference to the Prologue and a Syncretic (Oral and Written) Poetics. BibInt 147. Leiden: Brill, 2016.
Ghormley, Justus. Scribes Writing Scripture: Doublets, Textual Divination, and the Formation of the Book of Jeremiah. VTSup 189. Leiden: Brill, 2021.
Gordley, Matthew. “Psalms of Solomon as Solomonic Discourse: The Nature and Function of Attribution to Solomon in a Pseudonymous Psalm Collection.” JSP 25.1 (2015): 52–88.
Green, Gene. “Second Peter’s Use of Jude: Imitatio and the Sociology of Early Christianity.” Pages 1–25 in Reading Second Peter with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter. Edited by Robert Webb and Duane Watson. LNTS 382. London: T&T Clark, 2010.
Harrington, Daniel. “The Bible Rewritten (Narratives).” Pages 239–47 in Early Judaism and its Modern Interpreters. Edited by Robert Kraft and George Nickelsburg. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1986.
Hartog, Pieter. “Homeric Paraphrase and the Study of Scriptures at Qumran.” Pages 71–94 in The Dead Sea Scrolls in the Context of Hellenistic Judea: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies (Aberdeen, 5–8 August, 2019). Edited by Pieter Hartog and Andrew Perrin. STDJ 142. Leiden: Brill, 2023.
Hay, David. “Philo’s View of Himself as an Exegete: Inspired, But Not Authoritative.” SPhiloA 3 (1991): 40–52.
Hofmann, Norbert. Die Assumptio Mosis: Studien zur Rezeption massgültiger Überlieferung. JSJSup 67. Leiden: Brill, 2000.
Inowlocki, Sabrina. “Neither Adding nor Omitting Anything: Josephus’ Promise not to Modify the Scriptures in a Greek and Latin Context.” JJS 56.1 (2005): 48–65.
Instone-Brewer, David. Techniques and Assumptions in Jewish Exegesis Before 70CE. TSAJ 30. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992.
Jassen, Alex. Mediating the Divine: Prophecy and Revelation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Second Temple Judaism. STDJ 68. Leiden: Brill, 2007.
Keeline, Tom. “Vergil and Homer.” Pages 603–605 in The Cambridge Guide to Homer. Edited by Corinne Pache. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Kirk, Alan. “The Scribe as Tradent,” Pages 97–115 in Scribal Practices and Social Structures among Jesus Adherents: Essays in Honour of John S. Kloppenborg. Edited by William Arnal, Richard Ascough, Robert Derrenbacker, and Philip Harland. BETL 285. Leuven: Peeters, 2016.
Kirk, Alan. Q in Matthew: Ancient Media, Memory, and Early Scribal Transmission of the Jesus Tradition. LNTS 564. London: T&T Clark, 2019.
Knauer, Georg Nicolaus. “Vergil’s Aeneid and Homer.” GRBS 5.2 (1964): 61–84.
Knoppers, Gary. Prophets, Priests, and Promises: Essays on the Deuteronomistic History, Chronicles, and Ezra-Nehemiah. VTSup 186. Leiden: Brill, 2021.
Korpman, Matthew. “Reevaluating the Category of Rewritten Scripture: Jubilees, the Testament Job, and the Hierarchy of Authority.” JSJ 56 (2025): 1–21.
Kynes, Will. An Obituary for ‘Wisdom Literature’: The Birth, Death, and Intertextual Reintegration of a Biblical Corpus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Levinson, Bernard. Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Levinson, Bernard. Legal Revision and Religious Renewal in Ancient Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
MacDonald, Dennis. “Luke’s Antetextuality in Light of Ancient Rhetorical Education.” Pages 155–63 in Ancient Education and Early Christianity. Edited by Matthew Hauge and Andrew Pitts. LNTS 533. London: T&T Clark, 2018.
MacDonald, Dennis “Teaching Mimesis as a Criterion for Textual Criticism: Cases from the Testament of Abraham and the Gospel of Nicodemus.” Pages 241–50 in Reading and Teaching Ancient Fiction: Jewish, Christian, and Greco-Roman Narratives. Edited by Sara Johnson, Rubén Dupertuis, and Christine Shea. WGRWSup 11. Atlanta: SBL, 2018.
Machiela, Daniel. “Once More, with Feeling: Rewritten Scripture in Ancient Judaism – A Review of Recent Developments.” JJS 61.2 (2010): 308–20.
Mack, Burton. “Under the Shadow of Moses: Authorship and Authority in Hellenistic Judaism.” Pages 299–318 in Society of Biblical Literature 1982 Seminar Papers. Edited by Kent Richards. SBLSPS 21. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1983.
Majewski, Marcin. “The Phenomenon of Rewriting Scripture in Late Second Temple Judaism: Some Methodological Reflections on the So-Called ‘Rewritten Bible’ Category.” Verbum Vitae 39.4 (2021): 1311–334.
Marcos, Natalio Fernández. “Rewritten Bible or Imitatio? The Vestments of the High Priest.” Pages 321–36 in Studies in the Hebrew Bible, Qumran, and the Septuagint Presented to Eugene Ulrich. Edited by Peter Flint, Emanuel Tov and James Vanderkam. VTSupp 101. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
Marincola, John. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Mattison, Kevin. “Hypertextuality Theory and Interpretation in and of the Pentateuch.” ZAW 135.1 (2023): 2–15.
McAdon, Brad. Rhetorical Mimesis and the Mitigation of Early Christian Conflicts: Examining the Influence Greco-Roman Mimesis May Have in the Composition of Matthew, Luke, and Acts. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2018.
McElduff, Siobhan. Roman Theories of Translation: Surpassing the Source. New York: Routledge, 2017.
Morgan, Teresa. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Mroczek, Eva. “Moses, David, and Scribal Revelation: Preservation and Renewal in Second Temple Jewish Textual Traditions.” Pages 91–115 in The Significance of Sinai: Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity. Edited by George Brooke, Hindy Najman, and Loren Stuckenbruck. TBN 12. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
Mroczek, Eva. The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Najman, Hindy. Seconding Sinai: The Development of Mosaic Discourse in Second Temple Judaism. JSJSup 77. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
Najman, Hindy. Past Renewals: Interpretative Authority, Renewed Revelation and the Quest for Perfection in Jewish Antiquity. JSJSup 53. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
Najman, Hindy. Scriptural Vitality: Rethinking Philology and Hermeneutics. The Bible and the Humanities 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.
Nihan, Christophe. “Textual Fluidity and Rewriting in Parallel Traditions.” JAJ 4 (2013): 186–209.
O’Leary, Anne. Matthew’s Judaization of Mark: Examined in the Context of the Use of Sources in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. LNTS 323. London: T&T Clark, 2006.
Pelling, Christopher. Literary Texts and the Greek Historian. New York: Routledge, 1999.
Potolski, Matthew. Mimesis. The New Critical Idiom. London: Routledge, 2006.
Potter, Jonathan. Rewritten Gospel: The Composition of Luke and Rewritten Scripture. BZNW 267. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2025.
Punt, Jeremy. “What Are Authoritative Scriptures?” R&T 26 (2019): 52–71.
Reed, Annette Yoshiko. Demons, Angels, and Writing in Ancient Judaism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Rodgers, Zuleika. “Josephus’ ‘Theokratia’ and Mosaic Discourse: The Actualization of the Revelation at Sinai.” Pages 129–48 in The Significance of Sinai: Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity. Edited by George Brooke, Hindy Najman, and Loren Stuckenbruck. TBN 12. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
Russell, D.A. “De Imitatione.” Pages 1–16 in Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Edited by David West and Tony Woodman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Russell, D.A. Criticism in Antiquity. London: Duckworth, 1981.
Schippers, A.M. “Dionysius and Quintilian: Imitation and Emulation in Greek and Latin Literary Criticism.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Leiden University, 2019.
Segal, Michael. “Between Bible and Rewritten Bible.” Pages 10–28 in Biblical Interpretation at Qumran. Edited by Matthias Henze. Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005.
Seneca (the Younger), Epistles 1–65. Translated by Richard Gummere. LCL 75. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1917.
Simons, Robert. “The Magnificat: Cento, Psalm, or Imitatio?” TynBul 60.1 (2009): 25–46.
Stackert, Jeffrey. “Before and After Scripture: Narrative Chronology in the Revision of Torah Texts.” JAJ 4 (2013): 168–85.
Stackert, Jeffrey. Deuteronomy and the Pentateuch. AYBRL. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2022.
Swanson, Dwight. “How Scriptural is Re-Written Bible?” RevQ 21.3 (2004): 407–27.
Thompson, Thomas. “>Rewritten Bible< or Reiterative Rhetoric: Examples from Yahweh’s Garden.” Pages 49–64 in Rewriting and Reception in and of the Bible. Edited by Jesper Høgenhaven, Jesper Tang Nielsen, and Heike Omerzu. WUNT 396. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.
Tiňo, Jozef. “The Classification of Rewritten Scripture: A Plea for Retaining the Emic Perspective.” JSJ 49 (2018): 330–49.
Tolonen, Anna-Lisa and Elisa Uusimäki. “Managing the Ancestral Way of Life in the Roman Diaspora: The Mélange of Philosophical and Scriptural Practice in 4Maccabees.” JSJ 48 (2017): 113–41.
Toorn, Karel van der. Scribal Culture and the Making of the Hebrew Bible. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
Ulrich, Eugene. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Developmental Composition of the Bible. VTSup 169. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
Vayntrub, Jacqueline. “Like Father, Like Son: Theorizing Transmission in Biblical Literature.” HBAI 7 (2018): 500–26.
Whitmarsh, Tim. Beyond the Second Sophistic: Adventures in Greek Postclassicism. Berkley: University of California Press, 2013.
Whitton, Christopher. The Art of Imitation in Latin Prose: Pliny’s Epistles/Quintilian in Brief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Wiater, Nicolas. The Ideology of Classicism: Language, History, and Identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 105. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.
Williams, Catrin. “John’s ‘Rewriting’ of Mark: Some Insights from Ancient Jewish Analogues.” Pages 51–66 in John’s Transformation of Mark. Edited by Eve-Marie Becker, Helen Bond, and Catrin Williams. London: T&T Clark, 2021.
Williamson, H.G.M. “1Esdras as Rewritten Bible.” Pages 237–50 in Was 1Esdras First? An Investigation into the Priority and Nature of 1Esdras. Edited by Lisbeth Fried. AIL 7. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.
Zahn, Molly. Rethinking Rewritten Scripture: Composition and Exegesis in the 4QReworkedPentateuch Manuscripts. STDJ 95. Leiden: Brill, 2011.
Zahn, Molly. “Genre and Rewritten Scripture: A Reassessment.” JBL 131.2 (2012): 271–88.
Zahn, Molly. Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism: Scribal Composition and Transmission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Zsengellér, József, ed. Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? A Last Dialogue with Geza Vermes. JSJSup 166. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 147 | 147 | 15 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 14 | 14 | 4 |
| PDF-Downloads | 42 | 42 | 10 |
The corpus of texts called “Rewritten Scripture” have long been subject to debate about their categorization. When differentiating between minimalist (form-oriented) and maximalist (process-oriented) schools of thought, distinctions must be made between elements like content, techniques, purpose, and function to determine where these texts belong. This article does not attempt to redefine or reclassify Rewritten Scripture as a phenomenon, but contends with arguments suggesting that Rewritten Scripture is basically equivalent to Greco-Roman imitation (
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 147 | 147 | 15 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 14 | 14 | 4 |
| PDF-Downloads | 42 | 42 | 10 |