Save

Defining the Meanings of Magic

Andreas Libavius and the Semantic Construction of Paracelsian Magia

In: Daphnis
Author:
Bruce Moran Department of History, University of Nevada Reno Vereinigte Staaten

Search for other papers by Bruce Moran in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

In his critique of Paracelsian magia, Andreas Libavius (1555–1616) focused on the taxonomic differences between forms of magic, and concentrated especially on the conceptual semantic structures that underpinned those taxonomies (the sorts of language, associations, and meanings used to support them). In one text in particular, his Examen Philosophiae Novae (1615), he centered on the semantic roots of several key terms in the Paracelsian vocabulary (namely, knowledge, art, nature, the meaning of making, and the notion of harmony) and sought to dislocate them from their claimed associations and to transplant them into realms of fiction and the diabolical. In particular, Libavius paid attention to the ways in which Paracelsian definitions related to magia elided natural and supernatural, and impinged upon realms of the divine. In contrast, he insisted on a rule-based system of definitions, structured upon Aristotelian principles, that made the language of natural magic, viewed as natural knowledge, codifiable.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 410 370 14
Full Text Views 14 10 2
PDF Views & Downloads 38 28 2