Save

Defining the Meanings of Magic

Andreas Libavius and the Semantic Construction of Paracelsian Magia

in Daphnis
Autor:in:
Bruce Moran Department of History, University of Nevada Reno Vereinigte Staaten

Search for other papers by Bruce Moran in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Zitierung herunterladen Berechtigungen erhalten

Optionen für den Zugriff

Nutzen Sie bitte eine der untenstehenden Zugriffsmöglichkeiten, um den vollständigen Artikel zu lesen.

Institutszugang

Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.

Über Institut einloggen

Kauf

Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):

36,93 €

Weitere Zugriffsmöglichkeiten

Auf DeepDyve mieten
Token einlösen

Abstract

In his critique of Paracelsian magia, Andreas Libavius (1555–1616) focused on the taxonomic differences between forms of magic, and concentrated especially on the conceptual semantic structures that underpinned those taxonomies (the sorts of language, associations, and meanings used to support them). In one text in particular, his Examen Philosophiae Novae (1615), he centered on the semantic roots of several key terms in the Paracelsian vocabulary (namely, knowledge, art, nature, the meaning of making, and the notion of harmony) and sought to dislocate them from their claimed associations and to transplant them into realms of fiction and the diabolical. In particular, Libavius paid attention to the ways in which Paracelsian definitions related to magia elided natural and supernatural, and impinged upon realms of the divine. In contrast, he insisted on a rule-based system of definitions, structured upon Aristotelian principles, that made the language of natural magic, viewed as natural knowledge, codifiable.

Kennzahlen

Insgesamt Letzte 365 Tage In den letzten 30 Tagen
Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen 412 372 16
Gesamttextansichten 14 10 2
PDF-Downloads 38 28 2