The Sociomorphic Structure of the Polytheistic Pantheon in Mesopotamia and Its Meaning for Divine Agency and Mentalization

Beate Pongratz-Leisten

Jump to Content

14 The Sociomorphic Structure of the Polytheistic Pantheon in Mesopotamia and Its Meaning for Divine Agency and Mentalization

In: âA Community of Peoplesâ

Author:

Beate Pongratz-Leisten

Beate Pongratz-Leisten
Search for other papers by Beate Pongratz-Leisten in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

Type:: Chapter

Pages:: 269â299

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004511538_015

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

â¬42.00â¬35.00Â excl. VAT

Add to Cart

Redeem Access Token

Abstract

It is well established that the polytheistic pantheon in Mesopotamia was sociomorphic by nature. What is not yet clear, however, is how such a conceptualization of the divine world affected the allocation of agency to otherworldly beings or accorded with human experience, be it physical or mental. The following investigation begins by analyzing the ways in which people in the ancient Near East mentalized the divine and assigned it agency, and how they believed that the divine materialized and presenced itself. It then goes on to explore the use of myth as a conceptual metaphor and god lists as a system for constructing and interpreting the human experience. Myth here is regarded not as an irrational and archaic state of the mind, but as an analytical tool that provides explanatory, legitimizing, and orienting frameworks. In addition to myths, the ancients relied on lists of gods when systematizing and classifying the divine world as well as synchronizing it with their empirical observations of the natural world and the institutional models of human society. Rather than viewing myth and god lists as the product of the random deification of natural phenomena and objects, this paper presents both as epistemic systems of knowledge that reflect the polytheistic system of an interdependent network destined to maintain cosmic stability and order. In sum, it reexamines the way in which the ancients conceived of the nature of the divine and will pay particular attention to the notion of agency, thus casting the divine world in sociomorphic terms.

Citation Info

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share link with colleague or librarian

You can email a link to this page to a colleague or librarian:
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/edcoll/9789004511538/BP000014.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

Collapse
Expand

âA Community of Peoplesâ

Studies on Society and Politics in the Bible and Ancient Near East in Honor of Daniel E. Fleming

Series:Â Harvard Semitic Studies, Volume: 69

E-Book ISBN:: 9789004511538

Publisher:: Brill

Print Publication Date:: 28 Apr 2022

Subjects
- Ancient Near East and Egypt
  - Religion
- Biblical Studies
  - Biblical Interpretations

Front Matter

Back Matter

Metrics

	All Time	Past 365 days	Past 30 Days
Abstract Views	1002	388	101
Full Text Views	43	12	0
PDF Views & Downloads	71	13	0

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

Authors

Open Access

Product Information

Company

Contact

14 The Sociomorphic Structure of the Polytheistic Pantheon in Mesopotamia and Its Meaning for Divine Agency and Mentalization

Abstract

Citation Info

Share link with colleague or librarian

âA Community of Peoplesâ

Studies on Society and Politics in the Bible and Ancient Near East in Honor of Daniel E. Fleming

Table of Contents

Metrics

Metrics

âA Community of Peoplesâ