Fueling the immune response: whatâs the cost?

R.W. Johnson

Fueling the immune response: whatâs the cost?

In: Feed efficiency in swine

Author:

R.W. Johnson

R.W. Johnson Department of Animal Sciences and Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, 4 Animal Sciences Laboratory, 1207 W. Gregory Drive, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; rwjohn@illinois.edu

Search for other papers by R.W. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

Type:: Chapter

Pages:: 211â223

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086867561_012

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

â¬42.00â¬35.00Â excl. VAT

Add to Cart

Redeem Access Token

Pigs kept in environments where they are exposed to a high number of pathogenic microbes have reduced feed intake and growth, even when no obvious acute illness exists. This chronic drain on production is called immunological stress. Sentinel immune cells (e.g. macrophages) âsenseâ the diverse microbial environment by detecting pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are molecules associated with groups of pathogens. The immune sentinels detect PAMPs mainly with Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Stimulation of macrophages through their TLRs leads to the synthesis and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins, thereby initiating the inflammatory response that recruits both soluble immune molecules and circulating immune cells. Pro-inflammatory cytokines enable the immune system to communicate with other disparate physiological systems. They rearrange the animalâs metabolic priorities, resulting in re-partitioning of nutrients away from productive processes towards responses that support the immune system. Thus, the immune system, through detection of PAMPs and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, is the critical chain link connecting the pathogenic environment to productivity. Estimates suggest that at maintenance a healthy animal uses about 0.5-2% of the bodyâs lysine for leukocytes, antibodies, and acute phase proteins. When mounting a robust response to an infectious pathogen the immune response is estimated to account for about 9% of the bodyâs lysine. Thus, the cost of immunological stress, in terms of lysine utilization, must lie somewhere on the gradient beginning at 2% (maintenance) and ending at 9% (robust immune response). Providing additional lysine in the diet does not alleviate the reduced growth caused by immunological stress because the capacity for protein accretion is inhibited. Thus, minimizing exposure to pathogenic microbes with sound environmental management practices must remain a high priority.

Citation Info

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share link with colleague or librarian

You can email a link to this page to a colleague or librarian:
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789086867561/BP000012.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

Collapse
Expand

Feed efficiency in swine

E-Book ISBN:: 9789086867561

Publisher:: Wageningen Academic

Print Publication Date:: 15 Nov 2012

Subjects
- Life Sciences
  - General
  - Animal & Veterinary

Metrics

	All Time	Past 365 days	Past 30 Days
Abstract Views	228	86	20
Full Text Views	6	4	0
PDF Views & Downloads	14	6	1

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

Authors

Open Access

Product Information

Company

Contact

Fueling the immune response: whatâs the cost?

Citation Info

Share link with colleague or librarian

Feed efficiency in swine

Table of Contents

Metrics

Metrics

Fueling the immune response: whatâs the cost?