Chapter 9 Bartholomaeâs Law
In: The Reconstruction of Indo-European Stop SystemsSearch for other papers by Tijmen Pronk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Anderson, Stephen R. 1970. On Grassmannâs Law in Sanskrit. Linguistic Inquiry 1, 387â396.
Bartholomae, Christian. 1882. Arische Studien. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Beekes, Robert S.P. 1988. A Grammar of Gatha-Avestan. Leiden: Brill.
Beekes, Robert S.P. 2010. Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.
Bennett, William H. 1966. The Germanic evidence for Bartholomaeâs Law. Language 42/4, 733â737.
Borowsky, Toni and Ralf-Armin Mester. 1983. Aspiration to roots: Remarks on the Sanskrit diaspirates. In: Amy Chukerman, Mitchell Marks, and John F. Richardson (eds.), Papers from the Nineteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 52â63. Chicago: The Society.
Burrow, Thomas. 1973. The Sanskrit Language. London: Faber and Faber.
Calabrese, Andrea and Samuel Jay Keyser. 2006. On the peripatetic behavior of aspiration in Sanskrit roots. In: Eric Bakovic, Junko Ito, and John McCarthy (eds.), Wondering at the Natural Fecundity of Things: Essays in Honor of Alan Prince, 71â94. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Centre.
Cantera, Alberto. 2017. The phonology of Iranian. In: Jared S. Klein, Brian D. Joseph, and Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of Comparative Indo-European Linguistics, vol. 1, 481â503. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cardona, George. 1991. On the dialect status of Vedic forms of the types daká¹£-/dhaká¹£â. In: B. Lakshmi Bai and B. Ramakrishna Reddy (eds.), Studies in Dravidian and General Linguistics: A Festschrift for Bh. Krishnamurti, 263â273. Hyderabad: Centre of Advanced Study in Linguistics.
De Decker, Filip. 2015. What is the Greek counterpart of (Protoâ)Indo-Iranian (*)th? International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 12, 89â164.
de Vaan, Michiel. 1999. The PIE root structure *Te(R)Dhâ. Historische Sprachforschung 112/1, 1â25.
de Vaan, Michiel. 2009. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden: Brill.
Ejerhed, Eva I. 1981. The analysis of aspiration in Sanskrit phonology. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 4/2, 139â159.
Hackstein, Olav. 2002. Uridg. *CH.CC > *C.CC. Historische Sprachforschung 115, 1â22.
Hoffmann, Karl. 1975. Aufsätze zur Indoiranistik. Band I. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Hoffmann, Karl and Bernhard Forssman. 2004 2. Avestische Laut- und Flexionslehre. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
Jakobson, Roman. 1958. Typological studies and their contribution to historical comparative linguistics. In: Eva Sivertsen (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Linguists, Oslo 1958, 17â35. Oslo: Oslo University Press.
Janda, Richard D. and Brian Joseph. 1989. In further defense of a non-phonological account of Sanskrit root-initial aspiration alternations. In: Joyce Powers (ed.), ESCOL â88. Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 246â260. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Janda, Richard D. and Brian Joseph. 2002. Sanskrit as she has been misanalyzed prosodically. Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 5, 59â90.
Kaye, Jonathan and Lowenstamm, Jean. 1985. A non-linear treatment of Grassmannâs law. In: Stephen Berman, Jae-Woong Cohe, and Joyce McDonough (eds.), Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 15, 220â233. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1965. Phonological Change. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.
Kloekhorst, Alwin and Tijmen Pronk 2019. Introduction: reconstructing Proto-Indo-Anatolian and Proto-Indo-Uralic. In: Alwin Kloekhorst and Tijmen Pronk (eds.), The Precursors of Proto-Indo-European: The Indo-Anatolian and Indo-Uralic Hypotheses, 1â14. LeidenâBoston: Brill.
Kobayashi, Masato. 2004. Historical Phonology of Old Indo-Aryan Consonants. Fuchu, Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1978. Proto-Indo-European obstruents. Indogermanische Forschungen 83, 107â118.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1981. Glottalic consonants in Sindhi and Proto-Indo-European. Indo-Iranian Journal 23/1, 15â19.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 2003. An Indo-European substratum in Slavic? In: Alfred Bammesberger and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Languages in Prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Winter, 253â260.
Kümmel, Martin Joachim. 2022. Indo-Iranian. In: Thomas Olander (ed.), The Indo-European Language Family. A Phylogenetic Perspective, 246â268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KuryÅowicz Jerzy. 1935. Ãtudes indoeuropéennes. Kraków: SkÅad gÅówny w ksiÄgarni Gebethnera i Wolffa.
Leumann, Manu 1928. Lateinische Grammatik. Laut- und Formenlehre, Syntax und Stilistik, in fünfter Auflage völlig neu bearbeitet. Munich: Beck.
Lloret, Maria-Rosa. 1995. The representation of glottals in Oromo. Phonology 12, 257â280.
Lombardi, Linda. 1994. Laryngeal Features and Laryngeal Neutralization. New York: Garland.
Lubotsky, Alexander M. 1981. Gr. pá¸gnumi : Skt. pajráâ and loss of laryngeals before mediae in Indo-Iranian. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 40, 133â138.
Lubotsky Alexander M. 2004. Avestan siiazdâ, Sanskrit sedhâ, Latin cedere. In: Adam Hyllested et al. (eds.), Per Aspera ad Asteriscos: Studia Indogermanica in Honorem Jens Elmegard Rasmussen Sexagenarii Idibus Martiis Anno MMIV, 322â332. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
Lubotsky, Alexander M. 2018. The phonology of Proto-Indo-Iranian. In: Jared S. Klein, Brian D. Joseph, and Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of Comparative Indo-European Linguistics, vol. 3, 1875â1888. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Martinet, André. 1955. Economie des changements phonétiques: traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: Francke.
Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1986. Indogermanische Grammatik. Band I. 2. Halbband: Lautlehre [Segmentale Phonologie des Indogermanischen]. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Meier-Brügger, Michael. 2003. Indo-European Linguistics. BerlinâNew York: De Gruyter.
Melchert, H. Craig fthc. The position of Anatolian. In: Michael Weiss and Andrew Garrett (eds.), Handbook of Indo-European Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mey, Jakob L. 1972. Was Bartholomae really a Grassmann? Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26, 81â89.
Meyer, Wilhelm. 1887. Kleine Beiträge zur lateinischen Grammatik. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft 28, 162â176.
Miller, D. Gary. 1977. Bartholomaeâs Law and an IE root constraint. In: Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics: Festschrift for Winfred P. Lehmann, 365â392. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Olander, Thomas (ed.). 2022. The Indo-European Language Family: A Phylogenetic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phelps, Elaine. 1975. Sanskrit diaspirates. Linguistic Inquiry 6, 447â464.
Puhvel, Jaan. 1972. âBartholomaeâs Lawâ in Hittite. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 86, 111â115.
Rasmussen, Jens ElmegÃ¥rd. 1987. On the status of the aspirated tenues and the Indo-European phonation series. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 20/1â2, 81â109.
Rasmussen, Jens ElmegÃ¥rd. 1989. Die Tenues Aspiratae, Dreiteilung oder Vierteilung des indogermanischen Plosivsystems und die Konsequenzen dieser Frage für die Chronologie einer Glottalreihe. In: Theo Vennemann (ed.), The New Sounds of Indo-European. Essays in Phonological Reconstruction, 153â176. BerlinâNew York: De Gruyter.
Sag, Ivan. 1974. The Grassmannâs Law ordering pseudoparadox. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 591â606.
Sag, Ivan. 1976. Pseudosolutions to the pseudoparadox: Sanskrit diaspirates revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 609â622.
Scharfe, Hartmut. 1996. Bartholomaeâs Law revisited or how the RÌ¥gveda is dialectally divided. Studien zu Indologie und Iranistik 20, 351â377.
Schindler, Jochem. 1976. Diachronic and Synchronic Remarks on Bartholomaeâs and Grassmannâs Laws. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 622â637.
Struijke Caro. 2002. Existential Faithfulness: A Study of Reduplicative Tetu Feature Movement and Dissimilation. New York: Routledge.
Szemerényi Oswald. 19904. Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Tremblay, Xavier 2005 Bildeten die iranischen Sprachen ursprünglich eine genetische Familie oder einen Sprachbund innerhalb des indo-iranischen Zweiges? Beiträge zur vergleichenden Grammatik der iranischen Sprachen V. In: Gerhard Meiser and Olav Hackstein (eds.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel. Akten der XI. Fachtagung der indogermanischen Gesellschaft 17.â23. September 2000, Halle an der Saale. Wiesbaden, Reichert, 673â688.
Vennemann, Theo. 1978. Grassmannâs law, Bartholomaeâs law, and linguistic methodology. In: Irmengard Rauch and Gerald F. Carr (eds.), Linguistic Method: Essays in Honor of Herbert Penzl. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 557â584.
Wackernagel, Jacob and Albert Debrunner. 1954. Altindische Grammatik. Band II.2. Die Nominalsuffixe. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Wodtko, Dagmar, Britta Irslinger, and Caroline Schneider (eds.). 2008. Nomina im Indogermanischen Lexikon. Heidelberg: Winter.
Yates, Anthony D. 2019. The phonology, phonetics, and diachrony of Sturtevantâs Law. Indo-European Linguistics 7/1, 241â307.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1965. Topics in Sanskrit phonology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 32 | 32 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 8 | 8 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 14 | 14 | 0 |
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Settings | Accessibility | Legal Notice | Sitemap | Copyright © 2016-2026