Chapter 5 Indo-European Root Constraints
In: The Reconstruction of Indo-European Stop SystemsSearch for other papers by Rianne van Lieburg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
LIV2: Helmut Rix (ed.). 20012. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben: Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen, 2nd edition. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Barrack, Charles M. 2002. The Glottalic Theory revisited: a negative appraisal. Indogermanische Forschungen 107, 76–95.
Beckwith, Christopher I. 2007. On the Proto-Indo-European obstruent system. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 120, 1–19.
Beekes, Robert S.P. 2011. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Benveniste, Émile. 1935. Origines de la formation des noms en indo-européen (Vol. 1). Paris : Adrien-Maisonneuve.
Bomhard, Alan. R. 2016. The glottalic model of Proto-Indo-European consonantism: Re-igniting the dialog. Slovo a slovesnost 77/4, 371–391.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. Feature geometry of vowels and co-occurrence restrictions in Cantonese. Proceedings on The West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 9, 107–124.
Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clements, G. Nick. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology 2/1, 225–252.
Clements, G. Nick. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1, 283–333.
Coetzee, Andries W. 2014. Grammatical change through lexical accumulation: Voicing cooccurrence restrictions in Afrikaans. Language 90/3, 693–721.
Cooper, Adam I. 2008. Reevaluating root structure constraints in Proto-Indo-European: The case of **DVD. Abstract for the 39th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. November 7–9, 2008, Cornell University. http://conf.ling.cornell.edu/nels39/NELS-39Abstracts/238-ReevaluatingRoot.pdf (accessed 2022).
Cooper, Adam I. 2009. Similarity avoidance in the Proto-Indo-European root. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15/1, 55–64.
Cooper, Adam I. 2011. Stop co-occurrence in the PIE root: A new perspective. In: Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin, and Brian Smith (eds.), NELS 39: Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 1, 217–226. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Fortson, Ben W. 2004. Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fournet, Arnaud. 2019. Did the ancestor of Proto-Indo-European have three or only two series of stops? Manuscript. https://www.academia.edu/40070172/Did_the_ancestor_of_Proto_Indo_European_have_three_or_only_two_series_of_stops_Arnaud_Fournet_draft (accessed 2022).
Gallagher, Gillian E.S. 2008. The role of contrast in laryngeal cooccurrence restrictions. Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 177–184.
Gallagher, Gillian E.S. 2010a. The Perceptual Basis of Long-Distance Laryngeal Restrictions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.
Gallagher, Gillian E.S. 2010b. Perceptual distinctness and long-distance laryngeal restrictions. Phonology 27/3, 435–480.
Gallagher, Gillian E.S. 2011. Acoustic and articulatory features in phonology—the case for [long VOT]. The Linguistic Review 28/3, 281–313.
Gamkrelidze, Tamaz V. and Vjačeslav V. Ivanov. 1973. Sprachtypologie und die Rekonstruktion der gemeinindogermanischen Verschlüsse. Phonetica 27/3, 150–156.
Haider, Hubert. 1985. The fallacy of typology: Remarks on the PIE stop-system. Lingua 65/1, 1–27.
Hayward, Richard J. 1988. Remarks on the Omotic sibilants. In: Marianne Bechhaus-Gerst and Fritz Serzisko (eds.), Cushitic-Omotic. Papers from the International Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic Languages. Cologne, January 6–9 1986, 261–299. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Huld, Martin E. 1986. On the unacceptability of the Indo-European voiced stops as ejectives. Indogermanische Forschungen 91, 67–78.
Iverson, Gregory K. and Joseph C. Salmons. 1992. The phonology of the Proto-Indo-European root structure constraints. Lingua 87/4, 293–320.
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2012. Lyman’s Law is active in loanwords and nonce words: Evidence from naturalness judgment studies. Lingua 122/11, 1193–1206.
Kawahara, Shigeto, Hajime Ono, and Kiyoshi Sudo. 2006. Consonant co-occurrence restrictions in Yamato Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 14, 27–38.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In: E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds.). Universals in Linguistic Theory, 170–202. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon. Leiden–Boston: Brill.
Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2016. The Anatolian stop system and the Indo-Hittite hypothesis. Indogermanische Forschungen 121/1, 213–248.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1978. Proto-Indo-European obstruents. Indogermanische Forschungen 83, 107–118.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1985. Proto-Indo-European glottalic stops: The comparative evidence. Folia Linguistica Historica 19 (Historica vol. 6/2), 183–202.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1986. Proto-Indo-European tones? Journal of Indo-European Studies 14, 153–160.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 2010. An outline of Indo-European. In Studies in Germanic, Indo-European and Indo-Uralic, 37–45. Leiden–Boston: Brill.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 2018. More evidence for Proto-Indo-European glottalic stops. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 71/1, 153–158.
Krauss, Michael E. 1964. Proto-Athapaskan-Eyak and the problem of Na-Dene: The phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics 30/2, 118–131.
Kroonen, Guus. 2013. Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden–Boston: Brill.
Kümmel, Martin Joachim. 2012. Typology and reconstruction. The consonants and vowels of Proto-Indo-European. Phonetics, Phonemics, and Morphophonemics, 291–329.
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1968. Indogermanische Grammatik (Vol. 2). Heidelberg: Winter.
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1986. A Gothic Etymological Dictionary. Leiden–Boston: Brill.
Lipp, Reiner. 2016. Final stops in Indo-European: their phonological classification as a key to the Proto-Indo-European root structure constraint. Slovo a slovesnost 77/4, 251–299.
Lubotsky, Alexander M. 1988. The System of Nominal Accentuation in Sanskrit and Proto-Indo-European. Leiden–Boston: Brill.
MacEachern, Margaret R. 1997 [1999]. Laryngeal Cooccurrence Restrictions. University of California, Los Angeles, PhD thesis.
Malzahn, Melanie. 2010. The Tocharian Verbal System. Leiden–Boston: Brill.
Matasovic, Ranko. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic. Leiden–Boston: Brill.
McCarthy, John J. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17/2, 207–263.
McCarthy, John J. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 45/2–4, 84–108.
McCarthy, John J. 2002. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meillet, Antoine. 1949. Introduction a l’etude comparative des langues indo-europeenes. Paris: Librairie Hachette.
Miller, D. Garry. 1977a. Bartholomae’s Law and an IE root structure constraint. Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics: Festschrift for Winfred P. Lehmann. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 365–392.
Miller, D. Garry. 1977b. Some theoretical and typological implications of IE root structure constraints. Journal of Indo-European Studies 5, 31–40.
Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern–Munich: Francke Verlag.
Pozdniakov, Konstantin and Guillaume Segerer. 2007. Similar place avoidance: A statistical universal. Linguistic Typology 11/2, 307–348.
Pronk, Tijmen C. 2013. On Indo-European tones, accentuation and ablaut. In: Götz Keydana, Paul Widmer, and Thomas Olander (eds.), Indo-European Accent and Ablaut, 149–176. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Salmons, Joseph C. 1993. The Glottalic Theory: Survey and Synthesis (Journal of Indo-European Studies: Monograph series 10). McLean, VA: Institute for the Study of Man.
Sandell, Ryan. 2016. Obligatory contour principle effects in Indo-European phonology: Statistical evidence and the morphology-phonology interface. In: Stephanie W. Jamison, H. Craig Melchert, and Brent Vine (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 141–160. Bremen: Hempen.
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stanley, Patricia C. 1985. Grassmann’s Law, Verner’s Law, and Proto-Indo-European root structure. Indogermanische Forschungen 90, 39–54.
Suzuki, Keiichiro. 1998. A Typological Investigation of Dissimilation. University of Arizona PhD thesis.
Vaan, Michiel A.C. de 1999. The PIE root structure *Te(R)Dh. Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics 112/1, 1–25.
Vaan, Michiel A.C. de 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden–Boston: Brill.
Vennemann, Theo. 1984. Hochgermanisch und niedergermanisch. Die Verzweigungstheorie der germanisch-deutschen Lautverschiebungen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB)106, 1–45.
Vennemann, Theo. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure: And the Explanation of Sound Change with Special Reference to German, Germanic, Italian, and Latin. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Voyles, Joseph. 1989. Bifurcational Germanic and glottonic Indo-European: A critique. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB) 111, 16–34.
Weiss, Michael L. 2009. Outline of Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 114 | 114 | 29 |
| Full Text Views | 6 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 10 | 10 | 0 |
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Settings | Accessibility | Legal Notice | Sitemap | Copyright © 2016-2026