Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Building on the institutional theory of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and research on CSR in the agriculture of post-Soviet transition economies, the present paper investigates the institutional, organizational and individual factors of farm engagement in CSR activities. Based on a survey of 800 farms in Russia and Kazakhstan, the interaction between the farms’ social role and multilevel institutional characteristics is addressed. We observe notable positive effects of local labor sourcing, insecure land use conditions and farm size (in terms of land area) on farms’ CSR engagement. Individually owned farms, as opposed to corporate farms, tend to be more CSR affine. In addition, we find weak statistical evidence of CSR engagement among the farms affiliated with agroholdings. We discuss the results in the context of different levels of CSR analysis.
Adams, R.B. and D. Ferreira. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 94(2): 291-309.
'Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance ' () 94 Journal of Financial Economics : 291 -309.
Adams, M. and P. Hardwick. 2002. An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies 35(5): 641-654.
'An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence ' () 35 Journal of Management Studies : 641 -654.
Aguilera, R.V., D.E. Rupp, C.A. Williams and J. Ganapathi. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review 32(3): 836-863.
'Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations ' () 32 The Academy of Management Review : 836 -863.
Aguinis, H. and A. Glavas. 2012. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38(4): 932-968.
'What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda ' () 38 Journal of Management : 932 -968.
Amaeshi, K., B.C. Adi, C. Ogbechie and O.O. Amao. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in Nigeria: Western mimicry or indigenous influences? SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.896500
Arato, M., S. Speelman, and G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2016. Corporate social responsibility applied for rural development: an empirical analysis of firms from the American continent. Sustainability 8(1): 102.
'Corporate social responsibility applied for rural development: an empirical analysis of firms from the American continent ' () 8 Sustainability : 102 .
Balmann, A., L. Chatalova, V. Valentinov, and T. Gagalyuk. 2016. When growth obliges: social responsibility of farms in light of the technological treadmill. Paper presented at: 149th EAAE Seminar ‘Structural change in agri-food chains: new relations between farm sector, food industry and retail sector’. October 27-28, 2016. Rennes, France. Available at: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/245072/
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
'Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage ' () 17 Journal of Management : 99 -120.
Battese, G.E. 1997. A note on the estimation of Cobb-Douglas production functions when some explanatory variables have zero values. Journal of Agricultural Economics 48(1-3): 250-252.
'A note on the estimation of Cobb-Douglas production functions when some explanatory variables have zero values ' () 48 Journal of Agricultural Economics : 250 -252.
Bavorová, M., Z. Bednarikova, E.V. Ponkina and O. Visser. 2021. Agribusiness social responsibility in emerging economies: effects of legal structure, economic performance and managers’ motivations. Journal of Cleaner Production 289: 125157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125157
Bear, S., N. Rahman and C. Post. 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 97(2): 207-221.
'The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation ' () 97 Journal of Business Ethics : 207 -221.
Bednaříková, Z., M. Bavorová and E.V. Ponkina. 2016. Migration motivation of agriculturally educated rural youth: the case of Russian Siberia. Journal of Rural Studies 45: 99-111.
'Migration motivation of agriculturally educated rural youth: the case of Russian Siberia ' () 45 Journal of Rural Studies : 99 -111.
Boulouta, I. 2013. Hidden connections: the link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics 113(2): 185-197.
'Hidden connections: the link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance ' () 113 Journal of Business Ethics : 185 -197.
Bourlakis, M., G. Maglaras, E. Aktas, D. Gallear and C. Fotopoulos. 2014. Firm size and sustainable performance in food supply chains: insights from Greek SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics 152(C): 112-130.
'Firm size and sustainable performance in food supply chains: insights from Greek SMEs ' () 152 International Journal of Production Economics : 112 -130.
Brammer S. and A. Millington. 2006. Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: an empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review 15(1): 6-18.
'Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: an empirical analysis ' () 15 Business Ethics: A European Review : 6 -18.
Campbell, J.L. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review 32(3): 946-967.
'Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility ' () 32 The Academy of Management Review : 946 -967.
DiMaggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147-160.
'The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields ' () 48 American Sociological Review : 147 -160.
Dudwick, N., K. Fock and D. Sedik. 2007. Land reform and farm restructuring in transition countries: the experience of Bulgaria, Moldova, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan. World Bank Working Paper No. 104. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
'Land reform and farm restructuring in transition countries: the experience of Bulgaria, Moldova, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan', ().
Epshtein, D., K. Hahlbrock and J. Wandel. 2013. Why are agroholdings so pervasive in Russia’s Belgorod oblast? Evidence from case studies and farm-level data. Post-Communist Economies 25(1): 59-81.
'Why are agroholdings so pervasive in Russia’s Belgorod oblast? Evidence from case studies and farm-level data ' () 25 Post-Communist Economies : 59 -81.
Fifka, M.S. and M. Pobizhan. 2014. An institutional approach to corporate social responsibility in Russia. Journal of Cleaner Production 82: 192-201.
'An institutional approach to corporate social responsibility in Russia ' () 82 Journal of Cleaner Production : 192 -201.
Gagalyuk, T. 2017. Strategic role of corporate transparency: the case of Ukrainian agroholdings. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 20(2): 257-278.
'Strategic role of corporate transparency: the case of Ukrainian agroholdings ' () 20 International Food and Agribusiness Management Review : 257 -278.
Gagalyuk, T. and F. Schaft. 2016. Corporate social responsibility in agribusiness. Agriculture policy report. German-Ukrainian Agricultural Policy Dialogue, Kyiv, Ukraine. Available at: https://www.apd-ukraine.de/images/APD_APR_08-2016_CSR_in_Ukrainian_agriculture_eng.pdf
Gagalyuk, T., V. Valentinov and F. Schaft. 2018. The corporate social responsibility of Ukrainian agroholdings: the stakeholder approach revisited. Systemic Practice and Action Research 31(6): 675-698.
'The corporate social responsibility of Ukrainian agroholdings: the stakeholder approach revisited ' () 31 Systemic Practice and Action Research : 675 -698.
Gagalyuk, T. and V. Valentinov. 2019. Agroholdings, turbulence, and resilience: the case of Ukraine. Journal for East European Management Studies 24(3): 484-496.
'Agroholdings, turbulence, and resilience: the case of Ukraine ' () 24 Journal for East European Management Studies : 484 -496.
Garrido, E., J. Gómez, J.P. Maicas and R. Orcos. 2014. The institution-based view of strategy: how to measure it. BRQ Business Research Quarterly 17(2): 82-101.
'The institution-based view of strategy: how to measure it ' () 17 BRQ Business Research Quarterly : 82 -101.
Graubner, M., I. Ostapchuk and T. Gagalyuk. 2021. Agroholdings and land rental markets: a spatial competition perspective. European Review of Agricultural Economics 48(1): 158-206.
'Agroholdings and land rental markets: a spatial competition perspective ' () 48 European Review of Agricultural Economics : 158 -206.
Greene, W.H. 2020. Econometric analysis, 8th edition. Pearson, Harlow, UK.
'Econometric analysis, 8th edition', ().
Grouiez, P. 2014. Farming strategies regarding ‘social responsibility’ in the Russian agricultural sector. East-West Journal of Economics and Business 17(1): 63-84.
'Farming strategies regarding ‘social responsibility’ in the Russian agricultural sector ' () 17 East-West Journal of Economics and Business : 63 -84.
Hajdu, A., M.F. Daziano and O. Visser. in press. Institutions and individual values motivating corporate social responsibility activities in large farms and agroholdings. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2020.0103
Hartmann, M. 2011. Corporate social responsibility in the food sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics 38(3): 297-324.
'Corporate social responsibility in the food sector ' () 38 European Review of Agricultural Economics : 297 -324.
Hermans, F., F.R. Chaddad, T. Gagalyuk, S. Senesi and A. Balmann. 2017. The emergence and proliferation of agroholdings and mega farms in a global context. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 20(2): 175-186.
'The emergence and proliferation of agroholdings and mega farms in a global context ' () 20 International Food and Agribusiness Management Review : 175 -186.
Heyder, M. and L. Theuvsen. 2008. Legitimating business activities using corporate social responsibility: is there a need for CSR in agribusiness? Conference Paper/Presentation No. 695-2016-47627. European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE) 110th Seminar. February 18-22, 2008. Innsbruck-Igls, Austria, pp. 175-187. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.49851
Heyder, M. and L. Theuvsen. 2012. Determinants and effects of corporate social responsibility in German agribusiness: a PLS model. Agribusiness 28(4): 400-420.
'Determinants and effects of corporate social responsibility in German agribusiness: a PLS model ' () 28 Agribusiness : 400 -420.
Ho, L.-C.J. and M.E. Taylor. 2007. An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 18(2): 123-150.
'An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: evidence from the United States and Japan ' () 18 Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting : 123 -150.
Hosmer, D.W., S. Lemeshow and R.X. Sturdivant. 2013. Applied logistic regression, 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.
'Applied logistic regression, 3rd edition', ().
Jauernig, J. and V. Valentinov. 2019. CSR as hypocrisy avoidance: a conceptual framework. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 10(1): 2-25.
'CSR as hypocrisy avoidance: a conceptual framework ' () 10 Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal : 2 -25.
Kvartiuk, V. and M. Petrick. 2021. Liberal land reform in Kazakhstan? The effect on land rental and credit markets. World Development 138: 105285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105285
Kvartiuk, V., M. Petrick, M., Bavorová, Z. Bednaříková and E. Ponkina. 2020. A brain drain in Russian agriculture? Migration sentiments among skilled Russian rural youth. Europe-Asia Studies 72(8): 1352-1377.
'A brain drain in Russian agriculture? Migration sentiments among skilled Russian rural youth ' () 72 Europe-Asia Studies : 1352 -1377.
Larrieta-Rubín de Celis, I., E. Velasco-Balmaseda, S. Fernández de Bobadilla, M.D.M. Alonso-Almeida and G. Intxaurburu-Clemente. 2015. Does having women managers lead to increased gender equality practices in corporate social responsibility? Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 24(1): 91-110.
'Does having women managers lead to increased gender equality practices in corporate social responsibility? ' () 24 Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility : 91 -110.
Lerman, Z., C. Csaki and G. Feder. 2004. Agriculture in transition. Land policies and evolving farm structures in post-Soviet countries. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, USA.
'Agriculture in transition. Land policies and evolving farm structures in post-Soviet countries', ().
Lin, K.Z., S. Cheng and F. Zhang. 2017. Corporate social responsibility, institutional environments, and tax avoidance: evidence from a subnational comparison in China. The International Journal of Accounting 52(4): 303-318.
'Corporate social responsibility, institutional environments, and tax avoidance: evidence from a subnational comparison in China ' () 52 The International Journal of Accounting : 303 -318.
Li, W. and R. Zhang. 2010. Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics 96(4): 631-645.
'Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: evidence from China ' () 96 Journal of Business Ethics : 631 -645.
Lioubimtseva, E. and G.M. Henebry. 2012. Grain production trends in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan: new opportunities in an increasingly unstable world? Frontiers of Earth Science 6(2): 157-166.
'Grain production trends in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan: new opportunities in an increasingly unstable world? ' () 6 Frontiers of Earth Science : 157 -166.
Matten, D. and J. Moon. 2008. ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33(2): 404-424.
'‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility ' () 33 Academy of Management Review : 404 -424.
McElroy, K.M. and J.J. Siegfried. 1985. The effect of firm size on corporate philanthropy. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 25(2): 18-26.
'The effect of firm size on corporate philanthropy ' () 25 Quarterly Review of Economics and Business : 18 -26.
McWilliams, A. and D.S. Siegel. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21(5): 603-609.
'Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? ' () 21 Strategic Management Journal : 603 -609.
Nizalov, D., S. Thornsbury, S. Loveridge, M. Woods and O. Zadorozhna. 2015. Dynamics of agricultural production and land use in post-soviet Ukraine. In: A. Schmitz and W. Meyers (eds.) Transition to agricultural market economies: the future of Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine. Cabi International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 215-227.
'Dynamics of agricultural production and land use in post-soviet Ukraine ', () 215 -227.
Orlitzky, M. 2001. Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics 33(2): 167-180.
'Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? ' () 33 Journal of Business Ethics : 167 -180.
Oshakbayev, D., R. Taitukova, M. Petrick and N. Djanibekov. 2018. Kazakhstan’s cotton sector reforms since independence. Discussion Paper No. 172. Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Halle (Saale), Germany. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/173255/1/1011202573.pdf
Pallot, J. and T. Nefedova. 2007. Russia’s unknown agriculture. Household production in post-socialist rural Russia, 1st edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
'Russia’s unknown agriculture. Household production in post-socialist rural Russia', ().
Panwar, R., K. Paul, E. Nybakk, E. Hansen and D. Thompson. 2014. The legitimacy of CSR actions of publicly traded companies versus family-owned companies. Journal of Business Ethics 125(3): 481-496.
'The legitimacy of CSR actions of publicly traded companies versus family-owned companies ' () 125 Journal of Business Ethics : 481 -496.
Petrick, M. and L. Götz. 2019. Herd growth, farm organisation and subsidies in the dairy sector of Russia and Kazakhstan. Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(3): 789-811.
'Herd growth, farm organisation and subsidies in the dairy sector of Russia and Kazakhstan ' () 70 Journal of Agricultural Economics : 789 -811.
Petrick, M. and D. Oshakbaev. 2015. Kazakhstan’s agricultural development constraints: evidence from the wheat, beef and dairy sectors. In: A. Schmitz and W.H. Meyers (eds.) Transition to agricultural market economies: the future of Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp. 15-26.
'Kazakhstan’s agricultural development constraints: evidence from the wheat, beef and dairy sectors ', () 15 -26.
Petrick, M., D. Oshakbaev and J. Wandel. 2017. More than pouring money into an ailing sector? Farm-level financial constraints and Kazakhstan’s ‘Agribusiness 2020’ strategy. In: S. Gomez y Paloma, S. Mary, S. Langrell and P. Ciaian (eds.) The Eurasian wheat belt and food security. Global and regional aspects. Springer, New York, NY, USA, pp. 103-118.
'More than pouring money into an ailing sector? Farm-level financial constraints and Kazakhstan’s ‘Agribusiness 2020’ strategy ', () 103 -118.
Petrick, M., J. Wandel and K. Karsten. 2013. Rediscovering the virgin lands: agricultural investment and rural livelihoods in a Eurasian frontier area. World Development 43: 164-179.
'Rediscovering the virgin lands: agricultural investment and rural livelihoods in a Eurasian frontier area ' () 43 World Development : 164 -179.
Pisani, N., A. Kourula, A. Kolk and R. Meijer. 2017. How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review. Journal of World Business 52(5): 591-614.
'How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review ' () 52 Journal of World Business : 591 -614.
Quazi, A.M. 2003. Identifying the determinants of corporate managers’ perceived social obligations. Management Decision 41(9): 822-831.
'Identifying the determinants of corporate managers’ perceived social obligations ' () 41 Management Decision : 822 -831.
Scott, W.R. 1991. Unpacking institutional arguments. In: W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 164-182.
'Unpacking institutional arguments ', () 164 -182.
Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
'Institutions and organizations', ().
Setó-Pamies, D., 2015. The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 22(6): 334-345.
'The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility ' () 22 Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management : 334 -345.
Smedley, T. 2012. Is it time for the cooperative as a more viable alternative for business? The Guardian, 9 July 2012. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/co-operative-viable-alternative-business-model
Soares, R., C. Marquis and M. Lee. 2011. Report: gender and corporate social responsibility: It’s a matter of sustainability. Catalyst, 11 November 2011. Available at: https://www.catalyst.org/research/gender-and-corporate-social-responsibility-its-a-matter-of-sustainability/
Stanwick, P.A. and S.D. Stanwick. 1998. The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: an empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17(2): 195-204.
'The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: an empirical examination ' () 17 Journal of Business Ethics : 195 -204.
Tilt, C.A., 2016. Corporate social responsibility research: the importance of context. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 1(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0003-7
Tjur, T. 2009. Coefficients of determination in logistic regression models – a new proposal: the coefficient of discrimination. The American Statistician 63(4): 366-372.
'Coefficients of determination in logistic regression models – a new proposal: the coefficient of discrimination ' () 63 The American Statistician : 366 -372.
Tleubayev, A., I. Bobojonov, T. Gagalyuk and T. Glauben. 2020. Board genderd diversity and firm performance: evidence from Russian agri-fodd industry. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 23(1): 35-54.
'Board genderd diversity and firm performance: evidence from Russian agri-fodd industry ' () 23 International Food and Agribusiness Management Review : 35 -54.
Udayasankar, K. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics 83(2): 167-175.
'Corporate social responsibility and firm size ' () 83 Journal of Business Ethics : 167 -175.
Unay-Gailhard, İ., M. Bavorová, Z. Bednaříková, Z. and E.V. Ponkina. 2019. ‘I don’t want to work in agriculture!’ The transition from agricultural education to the labor market in rural Russia. Rural Sociology 84(2): 315-349.
'‘I don’t want to work in agriculture!’ The transition from agricultural education to the labor market in rural Russia ' () 84 Rural Sociology : 315 -349.
Vaz, N., B. Fernandez-Feijoo and S. Ruiz. 2016. Integrated reporting: an international overview. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 25(4): 577-591.
'Integrated reporting: an international overview ' () 25 Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility : 577 -591.
Visser, O., A. Kurakin and A. Nikulin. 2019. Corporate social responsibility, coexistence and contestation: large farms’ changing responsibilities vis-à-vis rural households in Russia. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement 40(4): 580-599.
'Corporate social responsibility, coexistence and contestation: large farms’ changing responsibilities vis-à-vis rural households in Russia ' () 40 Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement : 580 -599.
Visser, O., N. Mamonova and M. Spoor. 2012. Oligarchs, megafarms and land reserves: understanding land grabbing in Russia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3-4): 899-931.
'Oligarchs, megafarms and land reserves: understanding land grabbing in Russia ' () 39 The Journal of Peasant Studies : 899 -931.
Wädekin, K.-E. 1973. The private sector in Soviet agriculture, 2nd edition. University of California Press, Berkley, CA, USA.
'The private sector in Soviet agriculture, 2nd edition', ().
Wegren, S.K. 2009. Land reform in Russia. Institutional design and behavioral responses. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.
'Land reform in Russia. Institutional design and behavioral responses', ().
Wegren, S.K., 2018. The ‘left behind’: smallholders in contemporary Russian agriculture. Journal of Agrarian Change 18(4): 913-925.
'The ‘left behind’: smallholders in contemporary Russian agriculture ' () 18 Journal of Agrarian Change : 913 -925.
Wegren, S.K. and C. Elvestad. 2018. Russia’s food self-sufficiency and food security: an assessment. Post-Communist Economies 30(5): 565-587.
'Russia’s food self-sufficiency and food security: an assessment ' () 30 Post-Communist Economies : 565 -587.
Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.
'A resource-based view of the firm ' () 5 Strategic Management Journal : 171 -180.
White, A. 2007. Internal migration trends in Soviet and post-Soviet European Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 59(6): 887-911.
'Internal migration trends in Soviet and post-Soviet European Russia ' () 59 Europe-Asia Studies : 887 -911.
Williamson, O.E., 1983. Credible commitments: using hostages to support exchange. The American Economic Review 73(4): 519-540.
'Credible commitments: using hostages to support exchange ' () 73 The American Economic Review : 519 -540.
Williamson, O.E., 1996. The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
'The mechanisms of governance', ().
Wood, D.J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review 16(4): 691-718.
'Corporate social performance revisited ' () 16 The Academy of Management Review : 691 -718.
Wooten, M. and A.J. Hoffman. 2008. Organizational fields: past, present and future. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby and K. Sahlin (eds.) The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, pp.131-147.
'Organizational fields: past, present and future ', () 131 -147.
Zhang, J.Q., H. Zhu and H.-B. Ding. 2013. Board composition and corporate social responsibility: an empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics 114(3): 1-12.
'Board composition and corporate social responsibility: an empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era ' () 114 Journal of Business Ethics : 1 -12.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 665 | 260 | 33 |
| PDF-Downloads | 450 | 159 | 13 |
Building on the institutional theory of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and research on CSR in the agriculture of post-Soviet transition economies, the present paper investigates the institutional, organizational and individual factors of farm engagement in CSR activities. Based on a survey of 800 farms in Russia and Kazakhstan, the interaction between the farms’ social role and multilevel institutional characteristics is addressed. We observe notable positive effects of local labor sourcing, insecure land use conditions and farm size (in terms of land area) on farms’ CSR engagement. Individually owned farms, as opposed to corporate farms, tend to be more CSR affine. In addition, we find weak statistical evidence of CSR engagement among the farms affiliated with agroholdings. We discuss the results in the context of different levels of CSR analysis.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 665 | 260 | 33 |
| PDF-Downloads | 450 | 159 | 13 |