Save

Are different income sources fungible? The effects of agricultural subsidy and disaster relief on household consumption in China

In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review
Authors:
Xiaohui Peng Associate professor, Business School, Nanjing Normal University, No.1 Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing, China P.R.

Search for other papers by Xiaohui Peng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Li Zhao Lecturer, College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, 1550 Haigang Avenue, Pudong New District, Shanghai, China P.R.

Search for other papers by Li Zhao in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chengyan Yue Professor, Department of Applied Economics and Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1420 Eckles Avenue, St. Paul, MN, USA.

Search for other papers by Chengyan Yue in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David Ahlstrom Professor, Department of Management, CUHK Business School, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 12 Chak Cheung Street, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.

Search for other papers by David Ahlstrom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

This paper uses panel data from a sample of farm households in the northeastern China to examine the non-fungibility of different income sources. The results show the private transfer income has a high and significant impact on household consumption while agricultural subsidy and disaster relief have insignificant impacts. Empirical findings prove that the Behavioral Life Cycle Hypothesis is more practical than the Life Cycle Hypothesis. Moreover, they provide important macro policy implications as for how to stimulate farm consumption and expand domestic demand and encourage economic growth.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 419 206 9
PDF Views & Downloads 151 105 4