Despite the significant advances of Brazilian agriculture, transportation and storage costs still constitute the main barriers to the Brazilian agribusiness. The aim of this article is to analyze the effect of segregation of maize and soybeans in the Brazilian transport and storage logistics, especially genetically modified grains. In the context of the guidelines of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) as well as of the competitiveness in the international market, we develop a spatial equilibrium model in the form of a mixed complementarity problem. The competitiveness of Brazilian maize and soybeans on the international market is compromised by the inefficient logistics and slow responses to the demands of the CPB. The contribution of the paper is to evaluate how regulatory issues of a segment, in this case biotechnology, may interfere with logistic infrastructure projects.
Ahumada, O. and J.R. Villalobos. 2009. Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: a review. European Journal of Operational Research 196: 1-20.
'Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: a review ' () 196 European Journal of Operational Research : 1 -20.
Alvim, A.M. and P.D. Waquil. 2004. O problema de complementaridade mista: um modelo de alocação espacial aplicado ao setor agrícola. In: Métodos quantitativos em economia, edited by M.L. Santos and W.C. Vieira. UFV, Viçosa, Brazil, pp. 161-190.
'O problema de complementaridade mista: um modelo de alocação espacial aplicado ao setor agrícola ', in Métodos quantitativos em economia , () 161 -190.
Bishop, P.M., C.F. Nicholson, J.E. Pratt and A.M. Novakovic. 2001. Tariff-rate quotas: difficult to model or plain simple? Paper presented at the annual conference of the New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Wellington, New Zealand. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/gnlebhl.
Borges, I.C., J.M.F.J. Silveira and A.L.R. Oliveira. 2009. Constraints and incentives to agricultural biotecnology in brazil. Economia – Revista da ANPEC 10: 741-763.
'Constraints and incentives to agricultural biotechnology in brazil ' () 10 Economia – Revista da ANPEC : 741 -763.
Brasil. 2006. Decreto nº 5.705, de 16 de fevereiro de 2006. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/jgzm3h8.
Brooke, A., D. Kendrick and A. Meeraus. 1995. GAMS: a user´s guide. release 2.25. The Scientific Press, Redwood, OR, USA.
GAMS: a user´s guide , ().
Buanain, A.M. 2014. Alguns condicionantes do novo padrão de acumulação da agricultura Brasileira. In: O mundo rural no Brasil do século 21: a formação de um novo padrão agrário e agrícola, edited by A.M. Buainain, E. Alves, J.M. Silveira and Z. Navarro. Embrapa, Brasília, DF, Brazil, pp. 211-240.
'Alguns condicionantes do novo padrão de acumulação da agricultura Brasileira ', in O mundo rural no Brasil do século 21: a formação de um novo padrão agrário e agrícola , () 211 -240.
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB). 2014a. Armazenagem. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/h9vswkz.
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. 2014b. Levantamentos de safra. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/zom22j4.
Dunn, T. 1994. Rapid rural appraisal: a description of the methodology and its application in teaching and research at Charles Sturt University. Rural Society Journal 4: 30-36.
'Rapid rural appraisal: a description of the methodology and its application in teaching and research at Charles Sturt University ' () 4 Rural Society Journal : 30 -36.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2014. FAOSTAT. Availabe at: http://tinyurl.com/kzr77pz.
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI). 2011. Elasticities database. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/gra5wq7.
Fuller, S., T.-H. Yu, L. Fellin, A. Lalor and R. Krajewski. 2001. Effect of improving South American transportation system on U.S. and South American corn and soybean economies (TAMRC International Market Research Report No. IM-2-01). Availabe at: http://tinyurl.com/j5yusnh.
Fuller, S., T.-H. Yu, L. Fellin, A. Lalor and R. Krajewski. 2003. Transportation developments in South America and their effect on international agricultural competitiveness. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1820: 62-68.
'Transportation developments in South America and their effect on international agricultural competitiveness ' () 1820 Journal of the Transportation Research Board : 62 -68.
Gruère, G.P. and M.W. Rosegrant. 2008. Assessing the implementation effects of the biosafety protocol’s proposed stringent information requirements for genetically modified commodities in countries of the Asia Pacific economic cooperation. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 30: 214-232.
'Assessing the implementation effects of the biosafety protocol’s proposed stringent information requirements for genetically modified commodities in countries of the Asia Pacific economic cooperation ' () 30 Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy : 214 -232.
Huang, J., D. Zhang, J. Yang, S. Rozelle and N. Kalaitzandonakes. 2008. Will the biosafety protocol hinder or protect the developing world: learning from China’s experience. Food Policy 33: 1-12.
'Will the biosafety protocol hinder or protect the developing world: learning from China’s experience ' () 33 Food Policy : 1 -12.
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). 2015. GM approval database. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/hhzocle.
James, C. 2013. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013. ISAAA Brief No. 46. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, USA.
'Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013 ', in ISAAA Brief No. 46 , ().
Kalaitzandonakes, N. 2004. The potential impacts of the biosafety protocol on agricultural commodity trade. International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council. Washington, WA, USA. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/z5sx4s8.
Mackenzie, R., F. Burhenne-Guilmin, A.G.M. La Viña and J.D. Werksman. 2003. An explanatory guide to the cartagena protocol on biosafety. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/j9pvttd.
Oliveira, A.L.R., J.M.F.J. Silveira and A.M. Alvim. 2012. Cartagena protocol, biosafety and grain segregation: the effects on the soybean logistics in Brazil. E3 Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2: 17-30.
'Cartagena protocol, biosafety and grain segregation: the effects on the soybean logistics in Brazil ' () 2 E3 Journal of Agricultural Research and Development : 17 -30.
Rutherford, T.F. 1995. Extension of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19: 1299-1324.
'Extension of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis ' () 19 Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control : 1299 -1324.
Safras and Mercado. 2011. Banco de dados – Milho. Available at: http://www.safras.com.br.
Samuelson, P.A. 1952. Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. American Economic Review 42: 283-303..
'Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming ' () 42 American Economic Review : 283 -303.
Schlecht, S.M., W.W. Wilson and B.L. Dahl. 2004. Logistical costs and strategies for wheat segregation. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 551. North Dakota State University. Fargo, ND, USA.
'Logistical costs and strategies for wheat segregation ', in Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 551 , ().
Sistema de Informações de Fretes (Sifreca). 2011. Fretes rodoviários e ferroviários – milho e soja. 2011. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/gtp2x8n.
Simões, D.C. 2008. Regras, normas e padrões no comércio internacional: o protocolo de cartagena sobre biossegurança e seus efeitos potenciais para o Brasil. Master’s thesis, Universidade de São Paulo. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/jv2vcee.
Takayama, T. and G. Judge. 1971. Spatial and temporal price and allocation models. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Spatial and temporal price and allocation models , ().
Thompson, R.L. 1981. A survey of recent U.S. developments in international agricultural trade models. USDA/ERS. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/jmvkgxf.
Thore, S.A. 1991. Economic logistics: the optimization of spatial and sectoral resource, production, and distribution systems. Quorum Books, New York, NY, USA.
Economic logistics: the optimization of spatial and sectoral resource, production, and distribution systems , ().
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2011. Production, supply and distribution online. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/zn4ykur.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2014. Production, supply and distribution online. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/zn4ykur.
Waquil, P.D. and T.L. Cox. 1995. Spatial equilibrium with intermediate products: implementation and validation in the MERCOSUL. University of Wisconsin-Madison AAE Staff Paper No. 388. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/jxjp9tm.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 336 | 107 | 13 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 364 | 124 | 7 |
Despite the significant advances of Brazilian agriculture, transportation and storage costs still constitute the main barriers to the Brazilian agribusiness. The aim of this article is to analyze the effect of segregation of maize and soybeans in the Brazilian transport and storage logistics, especially genetically modified grains. In the context of the guidelines of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) as well as of the competitiveness in the international market, we develop a spatial equilibrium model in the form of a mixed complementarity problem. The competitiveness of Brazilian maize and soybeans on the international market is compromised by the inefficient logistics and slow responses to the demands of the CPB. The contribution of the paper is to evaluate how regulatory issues of a segment, in this case biotechnology, may interfere with logistic infrastructure projects.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 336 | 107 | 13 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 364 | 124 | 7 |