Save

Probiotic and synbiotic safety in infants under two years of age

In: Beneficial Microbes
Authors:
M. van den Nieuwboer

Search for other papers by M. van den Nieuwboer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E. Claassen

Search for other papers by E. Claassen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Morelli Istituto di Microbiologia Università Cattolica S.C., Food Microbiology and Biotechnology, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy

Search for other papers by L. Morelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
F. Guarner Digestive System Research Unit, CIBERehd, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain

Search for other papers by F. Guarner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
R.J. Brummer hool of Health and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 82 Örebro, Sweden

Search for other papers by R.J. Brummer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

In this study, we systematically evaluated safety aspects in clinical trials with probiotics and synbiotics in young infants (0-2 years of age). This study is an update of earlier reports and covers the recent literature from 2008-2013. The safety evaluation is performed along the Common Terminology Clinical Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 scale, hereby also providing guidance for future studies. Safety aspects are represented and related to number of participants per probiotic strain/culture, study duration, dosage, clinical condition and selected afflictions. The results show a deficiency in the precise reporting and classification of adverse events in most studies. Analysis of 57 clinical trials with probiotics and synbiotics in combination with eight follow-up studies indicate that probiotic administration to infants between 0 and 24 months is safe with regard to the evaluated strains in infants with a particular health status or susceptibility. Most adverse events and serious adverse events were considered unrelated to the study product, and there were no major safety concerns. Almost all studies concluded that none of the adverse effects were related to the study product; the study products are generally well tolerated. Finally, inconsistent, imprecise and potentially incomplete reporting as well as the variation in probiotic strains, dosages, administration regimes, study populations and reported outcomes, greatly limit the generalizability of conclusions and argue convincingly for obligatory and standardised behaviour on adverse events (CTCAE) reporting in ‘food’ studies.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 627 271 16
PDF Views & Downloads 464 173 7