Telling Tall Tales

“Uyghur Genocide” as a Political Stratagem

Series: 

Author:
Many claims of genocide do not present a prima facie case of the intent to destroy a group, let alone show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. They are a stratagem to enhance the claimant’s position in an inter-state or intra-state conflict. Claims about China’s Xinjiang are not based on the mass killings associated with genocide, but on birth limits for minorities in 2017-2021 that included practices previously applied to China’s Han majority for decades, plus brief family separations of a few minority children. These assertions impel Western sanctions and incite anti-Chinese sentiment but are empirically unsupported and degrade the concept of genocide.

Prices from (excl. shipping):

€155.09€147.00 excl. VAT
Hardback
Barry Sautman, JD (UCLA), LLM (NYU), PhD (Columbia University), is a political scientist and lawyer, and Professor Emeritus at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. His research is based on documentary and fieldwork methods, focusing on China’s ethnic politics as well as Africa–China relations.
1 Introduction: “Genocide” through the Looking Glass
 1 Crying “Genocide!” as the “Abuse of Abuses”
 2 Xinjiang: the Uyghur Region in Brief
 3 Genocide by Thee, but Not by Me
 4 Re-inventing “Genocide” in Xinjiang
2 “Uyghur Genocide” and Population: Myths and Realities
 1 Stricter Birth Limitations for the Majority Than for Minorities and “Genocide”
 2 “Uyghur Genocide” Inquisitors
 3 The (Temporary) Sharp Fall in Uyghur Births
 4 Genocide without Mass Killing?
3 Forcible Transfer of Children: No Force, No Transfer
 1 No Evidence, No Case
 2 Family Separations, Boarding Schools and Genocides
 3 Xinjiang Boarding Schools and the Genocidal Imaginary
 4 Boarding Schools: All-China and Xinjiang
4 The Fallback: “May Constitute … Crimes against Humanity” in Xinjiang
 1 Crimes against Humanity and the OHCHR Report of 2022
 2 Not Arbitrary, Not Detention
 3 Crimes against Humanity Unproven
 4 Other Crimes against Humanity: Torture and Mass Imprisonment
 5 Arbitrary Detentions Compared
 6 Criminals against Humanity?
 7 Substantiating Genocide and Crimes against Humanity
 8 The Role of Émigrés in the Discourse of “Crimes against Humanity” in Xinjiang
5 “Judging” Genocides Real and Imagined
 1 A “Very British” Pseudo-Court
 2 Propagandizing “Uyghur Genocide”
 3 Supporting Separatism, Denying Religious Extremism and Terrorism
6 Industrializing the “Uyghur Genocide”
 1 The Xinjiang Negative Narrative and Its “Industries”
 2 Xinjiang: No Settlers, No Colonialism
 3 Mortalities, Life Expectancies and Other Comparisons
 4 Poverty Alleviation versus “Genocide”
 5 Ethnic Population Balance and Benign/Malign Intent
 6 Terrorism or No Terrorism?
7 “Genocidal” Impetuses and Intents: Xinjiang and Beyond
 1 A Peculiar “Genocide” in Xinjiang
 2 Preferential Policies and Ethnic Fusion
 3 Speculative Sinophobia
 4 Xinjiang Sanctioned
 5 Forced Labor Unevidenced
 6 Work as a Normal Civic Obligation in China
 7 Forced Labor Unindicated
8 Controlling the Discourse of Xinjiang
 1 The US as “Savior of the Uyghurs”?
 2 Rhetorical Outbidding and “Uyghur Genocide”
 3 Ignoring Counter-Evidence
 4 The Uyghur Diaspora in the West and Ethnic Cleansing
9 Conclusion: Genocide without a Doubt or Genocide as a Stratagem?
 1 “The West versus the Rest” on “Uyghur Genocide”
 2 The Rise and Fall of Uyghur Jihadi Salafists
 3 Accepting or Rejecting the Uyghur Genocide Trope
 4 Weasel Words about Xinjiang
 5 The VETC Strategy and Terrorism
 6 Use and Abuses of “Uyghur Genocide”

Bibliography
Index
Readers for whom this book would be of immediate interest or relevance include academic institutes, human rights NGOs, political leaders and bodies, international lawyers and media practitioners. The relevant subject areas are China’s ethnic politics and genocide studies.
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Manufacturer information:
Koninklijke Brill B.V. 
Plantijnstraat 2
2321 JC
Leiden / The Netherlands
productsafety@degruyterbrill.com