Many claims of genocide do not present a prima facie case of the intent to destroy a group, let alone show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. They are a stratagem to enhance the claimantâs position in an inter-state or intra-state conflict. Claims about Chinaâs Xinjiang are not based on the mass killings associated with genocide, but on birth limits for minorities in 2017-2021 that included practices previously applied to Chinaâs Han majority for decades, plus brief family separations of a few minority children. These assertions impel Western sanctions and incite anti-Chinese sentiment but are empirically unsupported and degrade the concept of genocide.
Barry Sautman, JD (UCLA), LLM (NYU), PhD (Columbia University), is a political scientist and lawyer, and Professor Emeritus at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. His research is based on documentary and fieldwork methods, focusing on Chinaâs ethnic politics as well as AfricaâChina relations.
Readers for whom this book would be of immediate interest or relevance include academic institutes, human rights NGOs, political leaders and bodies, international lawyers and media practitioners. The relevant subject areas are Chinaâs ethnic politics and genocide studies.