The open access publication of this book has been published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
Are countries capable of reducing economic inequality under conditions of contemporary globalisation without cooperating and coordinating with other countries? While states are far from powerless to effect distributional change within their own sovereign space, Taking a Common Concern Approach to Economic Inequality makes the case that cooperation and coordination is indeed necessary, especially in relation to corporate taxation. It accordingly contemplates the utility of a transnational taxation system that is embedded in cooperative sovereignty through the recognition of rising economic inequality and its deleterious effects â including how increasingly unequal distributions within countries make transnational cooperation and coordination efforts less likely â as a common concern of humankind.
Alexander D. Beyleveld, Ph.D. in Law (2020), University of Bern, is a Senior Researcher at the Mandela Institute, University of the Witwatersrand and an admitted attorney of the High Court of South Africa.
Acknowledgements
List of Figures
Abbreviations
1âGeneral Introduction
2âThe Distribution of Income and Wealth within States Since the Beginning of the Twentieth Century Changes and Effects
â1âIntroduction
â2âChanges to the Distribution of Income and Wealth within States Since 1900
â2.1âDefinitions and Methodologies
â2.1.1âDefinitions
â2.1.2âMethodologies
â2.1.3âClarifications and Critiques
â2.2âA (Very) Brief Overview of Distributional Changes within the States Since 1900
â2.2.1âNorth America
â2.2.2âEast Asia and the Pacific
â2.2.3âSouth Asia
â2.2.4âEurope and Central Asia
â2.2.5âSub-saharan Africa
â2.2.6âLatin America and the Caribbean
â2.2.7âThe Middle East and North Africa
â2.2.8âConcluding Summary
â3âThe Effects of Changing Distributions of Income and Wealth within States
â3.1âEconomic Growth, Poverty Reduction and Mobility
â3.2âClimate Change
â3.3âConflict, Violence and Civil War
â4âConclusions
3âRecognising the Distribution of Income and Wealth within States as a Common Concern of Humankind
â1âIntroduction
â2âEconomic Sovereignty and the Distribution of Income and Wealth Since âGlobalizationâs Second Unbundlingâ
â2.1ââGlobalizationâs Second Unbundlingâ and the Distribution of Income and Wealth within States
â2.2âConceptualising the Distributive Aspects of Contemporary Economic Sovereignty
â2.2.1âAn Outline of âEconomic Sovereigntyâ and Its Relation to the Provision of Public Goods
â2.2.2âTowards a Contemporary Concept of the Distributive Aspects of Economic Sovereignty
â3âThe Recognition of Common Concerns of Humankind as Sovereignty Redefined
â3.1âThe Development of the Common Concern of Humankind Concept in International Law
â3.2âThe (Non-)recognition of a Common Concern of Humankind and Its Legal Implications
â3.2.1âThe Substance of, Space Covered by, and Location of Common Concerns of Humankind
â3.2.2âThe Temporal Elements of Common Concerns of Humankind
â3.2.3âThe (non-)Recognition and Mode of Recognition of Common Concerns of Humankind
â3.2.4âThe (Potential) Legal Implications of Common Concerns of Humankind: An Overview
â3.3âTowards a General Theory for the Recognition of Common Concerns of Humankind in International Law
â3.3.1âFraming a Common Concern of Humankind
â3.3.2âThe Threshold Question: Does State Sovereignty Need Redefinition?
â3.3.3âRecognition of the Common Concern of Humankind through a Process of Law
â4âChanges in the Distribution of Income and Wealth within States: to Recognise as Common, as Concern or as Common Concern?
â4.1âFraming Changes in the Distribution of Income and Wealth within States as a Common Concern of Humankind
â4.2âIllustrating That the Distribution of Income and Wealth Requires a Cooperative Conception of Sovereignty
â5âConclusions
ââAcknowledegments
4âRecognising a Distributional Common Concern in the Area of Corporate Taxation
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Multinational as Global Institution and Use of the Corporate Form
â2.1âMultinationals and Power
â2.1.1âInstrumental Power
â2.1.2âStructural Power
â2.1.3âDiscursive Power
â2.2âMultinationals and Authority
â2.3âThe âRelative Autonomyâ of Multinationals
â3âThe Multinational as the Most Direct Institutional Actor: The Example of Changing Distributions of Income and Wealth within States
â3.1âMultinationals and Within-firm Economic Inequality
â3.2âMultinationals and Between-firm Economic Inequality
â3.3âThe Inseparability of Within-firm Inequality and Between-firm Inequality
â3.3.1âTechnological-enabled Economic Globalization
â3.3.2âTechnological Change Per Se
â3.3.3âMarket Power: Product Market Concentration, Corporate Consolidation, Monopolies and Monopsonies
â3.3.4âExecutive Compensation
â3.3.5âTaxes
â4âParsing State Responsibility in Respect of a Distributional Common Concern into Multinational Action
â4.1âTo Change or Not to Change the Multinational and Corporations? Framing the Purpose of Corporate Law and Corporations
â4.2âTaming the Multinational through Imposing Corporate Responsibility through Cooperative Regulation
â5âTaxation of Multinational Firms and the Distribution of Income and Wealth within States
â6âTax Sovereignty as Cooperative Sovereignty
â6.1âThe Positive Elements of Tax Sovereignty
â6.2âThe Normative Elements of Tax Sovereignty
â7âRecognition of a Distributive Common Concern: Utility and Implications
â8âConclusions
5âConcluding Remarks
Bibliography
Table of Materials
Index
International economic law scholars; economic inequality scholars (non-lawyers included); institutes with focus on international economic law and/or economic inequality (e.g. WU Global Tax Policy Center, World Inequality Lab, UNU-WIDER)