This volume, now in its second and revised edition, deals with the legal status of the three Baltic States - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - as a consequence of the illegality of the Soviet annexation in 1940-1991. It offers a detailed historical overview of the Soviet takeover of the Baltic States in 1939/1940 and analysis of international law as it was in force, also regionally and bilaterally, at the time. It examines the role of the continuity of the diplomatic representations of the Baltic States and other manifestations of the Western non-recognition of the Soviet annexation. Moreover, the book examines the nature of the restoration of the Baltic States in 1991 based on their State continuity claim. It also studies in detail questions such as borders, citizenship and reparation claims, and asks to what extent State continuity could or could not be restored in practice. Compared to the first edition, the text has been updated (for example, on developments regarding border treaties) but also more background references have been added on the history of the Baltic States, Soviet and post-Soviet Russian responses to the continuity claim of the Baltic States, etc. The book interprets the Soviet annexation and Baltic States' continuity case against the wider backdrop of developments in international law in the 20th century and argues that the outcome reflected important normative developments in international law, away from mere effectivity. The case of the Baltic States will be relevant for current and future cases of illegal annexation, following the threat and use of military force prohibited under international law.
Lauri Mälksoo is Professor of International Law at the University of Tartu, Estonia, and a Member of the Institut de Droit International. He is a member of the Estonian Academy of Sciences and, from 2021, a member of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the Venice Commission). He received his legal education at the University of Tartu, Georgetown University (LL.M) and Humboldt University Berlin (PhD). He has conducted post-doctoral studies at New York University, the University of Tokyo and has been research fellow at Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, DC. He is co-editor-in-chief of the Baltic Yearbook of International Law (Brill-Nijhoff) and belongs to the editorial board of the Review of Central and East European Law (Brill-Nijhoff) as well as the advisory board of the Journal of the History of International Law (Brill-Nijhoff).
Preface to the First Edition
Preface to the Second Edition
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Introduction
PART I: Ex Injuria Ius Non Oritur
1 Illegal Annexation, State Continuity and Identity: Concepts and Controversies
â1 The Changing Status of Statehood in Contemporary International Law and Society: Starting Point for Analysis
â2 Re-established States in the Practice of International Relations: Historical Perspective
â3 State Continuity, Identity and Extinction in International Law Doctrine
â4 Issues Raised in Legal Doctrine by World War II Annexation Cases
ââa Does State Identity Always Imply State Continuity?
ââb What are the Normative Consequences of State Identity?
ââc The Basis in International Law for State Identity in World War II Annexation Cases
â5 Implications of the Illegality of Annexation for State Personality
2 The Legal Status of the Baltic States in International Law after 1991: Claims and Responses
â1 The Baltic Thesis
ââa The Republic of Estonia
ââb Republic of Latvia
ââc Republic of Lithuania
â2 Responses to the Baltic Continuity Thesis in the Practice of the International Community
ââa Restoration of Diplomatic Relations with Western Countries in 1991
ââb Subsequent Treaty Practice: Multilateral Treaties
ââc Practice Related to Bilateral Treaties
ââd Other Consequences of State Identity in Relations with Western States
ââe Practice as Related to Membership in International Organizations
ââf The Continuity Thesis of the Baltic States and the Russian Federation
â3 The Legal Status of the Baltic States: Views in the Legal Literature
3 The Baltic States Between 1940 and 1991: Illegality and/or Prescription
â1 Introduction
â2 The Illegality of Soviet Annexation
ââa The Soviet Occupation and Annexation of the Baltic States in 1940: Facts
ââb Soviet Occupation and Annexation of the Baltic States: Applicable Law
ââc Legal Evaluation of Soviet Policy against the Baltic States in 1939/1940
ââd The Illegality of Annexation in International Law: Soviet Views
ââe The Illegality of Soviet Annexation: General Conclusions
â3 Prescription and Soviet Rule in the Illegally Annexed Baltic States
ââa The Concept of Prescription in International Law
ââb Non-Recognition of the Soviet Annexation of the Baltic States: Law and Politics
ââc Survival of State Organs of the Baltic Republics in Exile
ââd The Baltic Peoples and Prescription
â4 Prescription? Conclusions
4 The âOccupationâ of the Baltic States (1940â1991)?
â1 The Baltic Thesis of Soviet Occupation (1940â1941, 1944â1991)
â2 Reception of the Baltic Thesis of Soviet âOccupationâ
â3 Development of the Concept of Occupation in International Law
ââa Were/Are the 1907 Hague Rules Applicable Beyond War?
ââb Occupation Versus Annexation
ââc The Main Requirements of the 1907 Hague Regulations for the Occupying Power and Practice in World War II
â4 An Evaluation of the Baltic Case: Fiction and Reality in Occupation Theory
ââa The Soviet Union and the Hague Regulations
ââb Which Rules of Occupation were Legally Applicable in the Case of the Baltic states?
ââc Conclusions: International Legal Rules Binding the USSR during its Occupation (Illegal Annexation) of the Baltic States
â5 Conclusion: The Baltic States 1940â1991, Continuity or Extinction?
PART II: Ex Factis Oritur Ius
1 Introduction
5 Controversial Claims for Restoration of Legal Rights in the Baltic Case
â1 The Prevailing Understanding of State Continuity in Doctrine
â2 Special Circumstances in the Baltic Case
â3 The Controversy about the Principle of Continuity of Citizenship and the Political Rights of Soviet Era Immigrants
ââa Introduction
ââb The Migration Policies of the Soviet Authorities
ââc The Citizensâ Congresses in Estonia and Latvia in 1990
ââd Baltic Debates about the Political Rights of Russian-Speaking Settlers in the Early 1990s
ââe Baltic Nationality and Naturalization Laws
ââf Acceptance by the International Community of Continuity of the Nationality Principle in Estonian and Latvian Citizenship Laws
ââg Conclusion: No Unrestricted Restoration of Nationality in the Baltic Case
â4 Changes with Respect to State Territories: Border Disputes since Restoration of the Independence of the Baltic States
ââa Estonia
ââb Latvia
ââc The Boundaries of Lithuania
ââd The Border Debate: Legal Issues
ââe The Border Debate: Conclusions
â5 The Issue of State Responsibility for Injuries Caused During Illegal Soviet Annexation
ââa Introduction
ââb Main Principles of the Law of State Responsibility
ââc On Conditions of State Responsibility in the Case of the Baltic States: the Issue of Attributability (the International Legal Status of Todayâs Russia)
ââd The Reparations Issue After Re-establishment of Baltic Independence
ââe The Reparations Issue: Conclusions
â6 General Conclusion from Practice: The Discrepancy between Status and Rights
6 State Continuity in Cases of Prolonged Illegal Annexation: Status and/or Rights?
â1 Introduction
â2 Realist Critiques of International Law
â3 The New Haven Approach and New Stream: Politics in International Law
â4 Doctrinal Proposal: Status Goes beyond Legal Rights and Duties
â5 The Domestic Analogy of Restoration in the Baltic States: No restitutio in integrum
â6 Conclusions
PART III: Between Normativity and Power: The Implications of the Baltic Case for International Law
7 The Baltic Case and Lessons from Other Cases
â1 Introduction
â2 Illegal Annexation and State Continuity
ââa The Annexation of East Timor and the Uncertainties of Non-Recognition in State Practice
ââb State Continuity as a Necessary Consequence of Illegality of Annexation
ââc Other Relevant Factors Beside Illegality? Precedential Effects
â3 Departures from the Effectiveness Principle and Fear of Unfulfilled Fictions
ââa Legality and Effectiveness in Tibet
â4 Concluding Observations