The Marxian theory of fetishism is usually interpreted as a theory of false consciousness, alienation, or reification pertaining to commodities or culture. This book reconstructs how Marx, Lukács, Adorno, and Lefebvre interpret and use the theory of the fetish to explain how capitalist social relations create a supra-individual, autonomous, and inverted form of social domination. These relations transform individuals into bearers of domination, thereby perpetuating capitalist society. The resulting reinterpretations of their respective social theories, and of the theory of the fetish, are crucial for a critical theory of capitalism today.
Chris O'Kane is a critical theorist who lives in Central Queens NY. Chris has taught in London, Humboldt, Portland, Texas, and New York City. He has published widely on Marx, The Frankfurt School, and Marxian Critical Theory. Chris is corresponding editor of the Historical Materialism journal. Along with Werner Bonefeld he edits the Critical Theory and Critique of Society book series.
âChris OâKaneâs book â embodying a confrontation with such diverse authors as Lukács and Rubin, Adorno and Schmidt, Postone and Heinrich, Lefebvre and Bonefeld â is an indispensable reference for understanding the key distinction between fetish character and fetishism. It goes well beyond the traditional interpretations in terms of alienation, reification, and false consciousness, while providing a most clever backward reading of Marx that allows us to integrate the early Marx into the mature Marx. âThingsâ are truly endowed with social power under capital, but their autonomous properties are not natural. The book shows that, to uproot the mystification of capitalism as an enchanted, perverted, topsy-turvy world, one must go back to the human source of abstract wealth, and hence to how Capital as the Automatic Fetish is socially constituted. The exploitative social relation â namely, the âconsumptionâ of living labour power, with human beings regarded as nothing but the bearers of labour power â turns into society as totalitarian domination. While the social characteristics of labour present themselves as objective properties of things, âsufferingâ is the experiential correlate of how the fetish character of money, value, and capital spreads fetishist illusions. Reclaiming Marxâs critique of political economy as a critique of society, in the way OâKane does, is essential for a political project that goes beyond emancipation towards liberation.â
âRiccardo Bellofiore, University of Bergamo (retired)
âFor me, Chris OâKaneâs work in critical social theory is synonymous with the Marx revival. Itâs not just a matter of OâKaneâs subtle reading of canonical works of western Marxism and critical theory (and beyond), where old-fashioned erudition is animated by the life and death stakes of actually existing capitalist society. Itâs also that OâKaneâs historical judgement on those theoretical trajectories is impeccable: his take on the relationship between different approaches; on why certain concepts resonate differently over time; on why one formulation is remaindered while another rises to the surface for debate once again; and so on. OâKaneâs cult-like following among contemporary Marxist and critical theorists is completely earned and deserved.â
âBeverley Best, Concordia University
âChris OâKaneâs masterful critique of fetishism as a reality of violence is a testament to the power of critical thought that, against the doctrinaire certainty of traditional Marxist critique, insists on deciphering capitalist domination as a social form of impersonal power.â
âWerner Bonefeld, Professor Emeritus, University of York (UK)
Acknowledgements Permissions
Introduction
Literature Review
â1âConceptual Typologies of Fetishism
â2âFetishism as False Consciousness
â3âFetishism as Lukácsian Reification
â4âFetishism as Alienation
â5âThe Classical Althusserian Conception of Fetishism
â6âValue-Form Theory Conceptions of Fetishism
â7âConceptual Histories
â8âConceptual Continuity
â9âConceptual Discontinuity
â10âOutline of the Bookâs Main Argument
Part 1 Marx
1 Social Domination in the Young Marx
â1âIntroduction
â2âMarxâs Conceptual Structure of Social Constitution and Social Domination
â3âMarxâs Critique of the Philosophy of Right
â4âAlienated Labour
â5âThe âGerman Ideologyâ
â6âMarxâs Critique of Proudhon
â7âConclusion
2 Capital and the Critique of Political Economy
âIntroduction
â1âA Critique of Political Economy
â2âMarxâs Theory of Value
â3âThe Valorisation Process in Capital Volume I
â4âThe Form-Analysis
â5âThe General Formula of Capital, Surplus Value, Production, Wages, Accumulation, and Primitive Accumulation
â6âConclusion
3 Social Constitution, Fetishistic Social Domination, and the Fetish-Characteristic Properties of the Forms of Value
âIntroduction
â1âThe Fetish Characteristic Properties of Commodities
â2âThe Fetish Characteristic Properties of Money
â3âThe Fetish-Characteristic Properties of Capital
â4âConclusion
4 Social Constitution and Fetishistic Social Domination in the Trinity Formula
âIntroduction
â1âAmbiguities and Gaps in the Trinity Formula
â2âContextualising the Trinity Formula
â3âThe Social Constitution of the Trinity Formula
â4âFetishistic Social Domination in the Trinity Formula
â5âConclusion
Part 2 Lukács
5 Lukácsâs Hegelian Classical Marxist Interpretation of the Fetish
â1âThe Marxism of the 2nd International
â2âThe Early Lukácsâs Theory of Social Constitution and Social Domination
â3âLukácsâs Hegelian Classical Marxism
â4âConclusion
6 Reification as Dominating Social Mystification
â1âLukácsâs Interpretation of Commodity Fetishism as Reification
â2âReification as Dominating Social Mystification
â3âReification as Dominating Social Mystification
â4âThe Constitution of Reified Totality
â5âConclusion
Part 3 Adorno
7 Adorno, the Critique of Political Economy, and the Fetishistic Properties of the Exchange Abstraction
âIntroduction
â1âAdornoâs Interpretation of the Critique of Political Economy
â2âAdornoâs Interpretation of the Fetishistic Properties of the Exchange Abstraction
â3âAdornoâs Interpretation of Capital Accumulation and Crisis
â4âAdornoâs Criticisms of Marx
â5âThe Fetishistic Properties of the Exchange Abstraction in Critical Theory
â6âConclusion
8 Social Constitution and Fetishistic Social Domination in the Negative Totality of Late Capitalism
âIntroduction
â1âThe Social Constitution of Negative Totality
â2âSupra-Individual Objective Fetishistic Social Domination
â3âSupra-Individual Subjective Fetishistic Social Domination
â4âCritical Social Theory
â5âConclusion
Part 4 Lefebvre
9 Lefebvre, the Critique of Political Economy, and Fetishistic Concrete Abstraction
â1âLefebvreâs Non-Systematic Marxism
â2âFetishistic Concrete Abstraction
â3âThe Limits of Fetishistic Social Domination
â4âConclusion
10 Social Constitution and the Social Domination of Fetishistic Concrete Abstraction in Everyday Life, Cities, and Space
â1âThe Critique of Everyday Life
â2âCities and Urban Form
â3âThe Production of Space
â4âConclusion
Conclusion
âIntroduction
â1âA New Perspective
â2âRelevance for Contemporary Critical Theory
â3âTowards a Critical Theory of Social Constitution and Fetishistic Social Domination
Bibliography Index
This book is especially relevant to advanced undergraduates, post-graduates and faculty who work on Marx, Western Marxism, and Frankfurt School Critical Theory in the history, sociology, philosophy, politics, literature, political economy, and cultural studies.