In the Dutch Republic, courts made decisions by voting and judgments were not given reasoned motivations. Although some judges kept a record of the preceding deliberations, the only extensive collections we have had until recently from the eighteenth century are those of van Bijnkershoek and Pauw. Fortunately, we are also in possession of the Observationes of Johan van Bleiswijk (in 1723â1748 a colleague of van Bijnkershoek). Van Bleiswijk provides an overview of the various opinions relating to cases at the time, but also expounds on his own views. In this way, he sheds light on his own perspective and legal views. Hence, van Bleiswijkâs Observationes are a most welcome addition to our knowledge of judicial decision-making in the Dutch Republic.
Boudewijn Sirks is Emeritus Regius Professor of Civil Law at the University of Oxford and Fellow of All Souls College. He has published articles on the Hoge Raad (Supreme Court) of Holland and Zeeland in the Dutch Republic and edited C. van Bijnkershoek, W. Pauw, Index in observationes tumultuarias (2005).
Preface List of Figures
Van Bleiswijk and His Writings
â1âJohan van Bleiswijk, by L. van Poelgeest
â2âVan Bleiswijkâs Legal Works
â3âThe Importance of Van Bleiswijkâs Observationes tumultuariae
â4âThe Notabile Resolutien (Not. Res.)
â5âThe Bijlagen
â6âThe Observationes tumultuariae
â7âThe Procedure before the Hoge Raad (HR, Supreme Court)
â8âThe Edition of the Observationes tumultuariae
Summaries of the Observationes tumultuariae
The Observationes tumultuariae of Johan van Bleiswijk
Cited Literature Cited Statutes, Ordinances etc.
Index of Sources (referred to in the Observationes) Index of Persons (referred to in the Observationes)
Index of Subjects Concordance
This book will be of interest to academic institutes, libraries, and specialists.