Applying discourse analysis within the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), this study offers a fresh reexamination of the textual and contextual relationship between First and Second Thessalonians. Through register analysisâa key component of SFL discourse analysisâit uncovers a unified linguistic profile across both letters, characterized by pastoral consistency, relational coherence, and structural clarity. By challenging traditional assumptions of textual and situational divergence, it offers a linguistically grounded evaluation of the Pauline authorship debate concerning the Thessalonian correspondence. Combining methodological rigor with accessibility, the study invites readers in New Testament studies, biblical linguistics, and early Christian discourse to engage these foundational Pauline lettersâtextually, contextually, and with renewed insight.
Sungmin Kim, Ph.D. (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, Ontario), is a lecturer at Chongshin University in Seoul. He specializes in New Testament studies, with a research focus on Greek grammar, discourse analysis, and Pauline theology.
Abbreviations
1 Introduction
â1âFraming the Debate
â2âReframing the Authorship Debate through a Linguistic Lens
â3âEstablishing the Argument
â4âOutlining the Study
2 Major Arguments in the Authorship Debate of Second Thessalonians in Its Relationship with First Thessalonians
â1âPreliminary Considerations
â2âThe Difference in Eschatology between First and Second Thessalonians
â3âThe Difference in Tone between First and Second Thessalonians
â4âThe Literary Similarity between First and Second Thessalonians
â5âThe Emphatic Authenticating Comment of 2â¯Thess 3:17
â6âConcluding Remarks
3 A Theory of Register within Systemic Functional Linguistics for Discourse Analysis of First and Second Thessalonians
â1âPreliminary Considerations
â2âDefining Register in Systemic Functional Linguistics
â3âAnalyzing Registers of First and Second Thessalonians
â4âConcluding Remarks
4 Analysis of First Thessalonians
â1âPreliminary Considerations
â2âPaulâs Commitment to Maintaining and Strengthening Relational Ties with the Thessalonian Believers (1â¯Thess 1:1â10)
â3âPaulâs Reminder of His Ministry among the Thessalonians (1â¯Thess 2:1â13)
â4âPaulâs Account of His Ongoing Pastoral Ministry in His Absence from the Thessalonians (1â¯Thess 2:14â3:8)
â5âPaulâs Intercessory Prayer for the Thessalonians (1â¯Thess 3:9â13)
â6âPaulâs Exhortations on Holiness to the Thessalonians (1â¯Thess 4:1â8)
â7âPaulâs Exhortations on Brotherly Love to the Thessalonians (1â¯Thess 4:9â12)
â8âPaulâs Exhortations on Those Who Sleep in Death to the Thessalonians (1â¯Thess 4:13â18)
â9âPaulâs Exhortations on the Day of the Lord to the Thessalonians (1â¯Thess 5:1â22)
â10âPaulâs Intercessory Prayer for the Thessalonians (1â¯Thess 5:23â24)
â11âPaulâs Closing Remarks and Farewell Greetings (1â¯Thess 5:25â28)
â12âMetafunctional and Situational Features in the Language of First Thessalonians
5 Analysis of Second Thessalonians
â1âPaulâs Commitment to Maintaining and Strengthening Relational Ties with the Thessalonian Believers (2â¯Thess 1:1â12)
â2âPaulâs Instructions on the Day of The Lord to the Thessalonians (2â¯Thess 2:1â15)
â3âPaulâs Intercessory Prayer for the Thessalonians and Prayer Requests (2â¯Thess 2:16â3:5)
â4âPaulâs Exhortations to the Thessalonians Concerning Brothers Who Are Idle (2â¯Thess 3:6â15)
â5âPaulâs Intercessory Prayer for the Thessalonians (2â¯Thess 3:16)
â6âPaulâs Closing Remarks and Farewell Greetings (2â¯Thess 3:17â18)
â7âMetafunctional and Situational Features in the Language of Second Thessalonians
6 Conclusion
â1âA Linguistic Perspective on the Authorship Debate
â2âMetafunctional Patterns of Meaning Construction in First and Second Thessalonians
â3âRegister of First and Second Thessalonians
â4âEvaluating the Arguments in the Authorship Debate
â5âRethinking Authorship Criteria
Bibliography Index of Modern Authors Index of Ancient Sources
This volume is aimed at scholars and postgraduate students in New Testament studies, Pauline authorship debates, biblical Greek linguistics, discourse analysis; academic libraries; theological and religious studies departments.