EUR  â¬94.80EUR  â¬79.00 excl. VAT
Inter-Religious Court Debates in the Early Tang Dynasty
A Translation of Reports of Nine Public Debates Between Buddhists and Daoists From Daoxuanâs Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng (T 2104)
Series: - Studies on East Asian Religions, Volume: 15
Author:
Public debate between representatives of different teachings was an important element in the formation of medieval intellectual culture; but documentation is scarce. Daoxuanâs reports are unique as they afford us a vivid glimpse on the debates held at the courts of the early Tang, including philosophical exchanges, jokes, and lively polemics.
The reports are part of Buddhist apologetic literature, and thus important documents relating to the introduction and adaptation of Buddhism in China. Their specific nature provides valuable insight into the institution of such debates and their development through interaction of Buddhist and autochthonous forms of intellectual and agonistic debate.
The reports are part of Buddhist apologetic literature, and thus important documents relating to the introduction and adaptation of Buddhism in China. Their specific nature provides valuable insight into the institution of such debates and their development through interaction of Buddhist and autochthonous forms of intellectual and agonistic debate.
Friederike Assandri, Ph.D. (2002), University of Heidelberg, is a researcher at the Institute of East Asian Studies of Leipzig University. Her publications include The Daode jing Commentary of Cheng Xuanying. Daoism, Buddhism and the Laozi in Tang Dynasty (OUP, 2021).
Academics and graduate students interested in Buddhism, the reception of Buddhism in China, and the development of institutions of debate across different Buddhist cultures.