Like many concepts in international law, the definition of ânecessityâ varies widely depending on context. The concepts of necessity in different fields of international law can maintain their unique definitions while learning from each other, and thereby achieve coherence. This book presents the evolution of the concept of necessity, and discusses its definitions in nine different fields of international law. Centering customary international law and the law of the World Trade Organization in his analysis, Dr. Senai W. Andemariam examines the potential for interactions and coherence between concepts of necessity in various fields of international law.
Senai W. Andemariam, Ph.D., Maastricht University, is a former judge and now the head of the Department of Law of the College of Business and Social Sciences in Eritrea. He received his LL.B. from the University of Asmara (With Distinction) and his LL.M. from Georgetown University (With Distinction) as a Fulbright Scholar. He has published with journals at Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Taylor and Francis, Routledge, Springer, DeGruyter, Brill and others.
Foreword
Acknowledgments
List of Tables
Acronyms
Introduction
Part 1 History of the Concept of Necessity in Law 1âEvolution of the Concept from the 1st Millennium bc to the 20th Century
â1.1âEarly Period
â1.2âMedieval Period (5th to 15th Centuries)
â1.3âThe Westphalian Concept of Necessity and the Aftermath (17th to 20th Centuries)
2âState and Tribunal Practices until the 1930s
â2.1âState Practices
â2.2âTribunal Practices
â2.3âAvoiding the Conflation
â2.4âLessons Learned from the State and Tribunal Practices
3âPlacing Necessity in the Context of the Relationship between Sovereignty and Treaty Law
â3.1âHow the Exercise of Powers of Necessity Evolved since the Peace of Westphalia
â3.2âConsent as the Binding Element in the Sovereignty-Treaty Obligation Interface
â3.3âLessons from the History, Practices and Presentation of Necessity since the 1st Millennium bc
Part 2 The Concept of Necessity in International Law 4âPreliminary Issues
â4.1âNecessity: A Widely Represented Concept in International Law
â4.2âIssues on the Concept of Necessity in International Law
5âThe Concept of Necessity in Different Fields of International Law
â5.1âThe Law of Use of Force
â5.2âInternational Humanitarian Law
â5.3âInternational Environmental Law
â5.4âThe Law State Responsibility as Codified in the arsiwa
â5.5âInternational Investment Law
â5.6âInternational Human Rights Law
â5.7âInternational Criminal Law
â5.8âThe Law of Responsibility of International Organizations as Codified in the dario
â5.9âLessons Learned from the Experiences with the Concepts of Necessity in Different Fields of International Law
6âThe Role of International Courts and Tribunals in Developing the Concept of Necessity in Customary International Law
â6.1âGeneral Notes
â6.2âThe pca
â6.3âThe pcij
â6.4âThe icj
â6.5âThe itlos
â6.6âOther International Tribunals
â6.7âLessons Learned from the Contributions of Various International Courts/Tribunals on the Development of the Concept of Necessity in International Law
Part 3 The Concept of Necessity in wto Law 7âHistory of the Drafting of the Necessity Defense Provisions in the General and Security Exceptions of the gatt 1994/gats
â7.1âPre-gatt 1947 Trade Agreements and Treaties Containing General Exceptions-Like Provisions
â7.2âThe US-UK Discussions for Post-Second World War International Trade Rules
â7.3âThe Drafting of the General and Security Exceptions in the London-New York-Geneva-Havana Meetings (1946â1948)
8âEvolution of the Interpretation of the Concept of Necessity in the General and Security Exceptions of the gatt (1947 and 1994) and the gats
â8.1âGeneral Observations on the Nature and Practice of the General Exceptions
â8.2âInterpreting the Term âNecessaryâ in the General Exceptions
â8.3âThe Concept of Necessity in the Security Exceptions
9âThe Concept of Necessity in Other wto Agreements, the tbt, sps and trips Agreements in Particular
â9.1âTextual Presence of the Term (Concept of) Necessity
â9.2âGeneral Background on the tbt and the sps Agreements
â9.3âThe Concepts of Necessity in the tbt and the sps Agreements
â9.4âComparing the Interpretations of Necessity in the General Exceptions of the gatt 1994/gats, the tbt Agreement and the sps Agreement
â9.5âNecessity under the trips Agreement
â9.6âHas a âwto Law Concept of Necessityâ Emerged?
Part 4 The Interaction between the Concepts of Necessity in Customary International Law and wto Law 10âThe Interface between Customary International Law and wto Law
â10.1âContextualizing the Relationship
â10.2âwto Law in the Universe of International Law
â10.3âThe Two-Way Relationship between wto law and International Law
11âRules on Interfacing the Concepts of Necessity in wto Law and Other Fields of International law
â11.1âRules and Practices of Interoperability
â11.2âInteroperability in the Context of the Current Crisis of the wto Dispute Settlement System
â11.3âContrasting the Concepts of Necessity in wto Law and cil
12âThe Exercise of Interfacing the Concepts of Necessity in wto Law and cil
â12.1âGrounds for Considering Interoperability
â12.2âPotential Interoperability
ââConclusion and Final Remarks
Bibliography
Index
Scholars, students, institutes, and practitioners of international law; members and support staff of WTO dispute settlement organs and other relevant international tribunals.