In Economics Imperialism and Interdisciplinarity: The Watershed and After, Ben Fine selects and adds to his key articles tracking economics imperialism through three phases, focusing on the last decade of the third phase â anything goes as with freakonomics. Each article is accompanied by a preamble setting the context in which it appeared, with a new overall introduction and literature survey drawing out the overall significance for contemporary scholarship.
Ranging over mainstream and heterodox economics, the disputes between them, the relationship between economics and other disciplines, and authors such as Lazear, Stiglitz and Akerlof, the accelerating presence of economics imperialism is documented alongside its perverse, critical neglect. The volume is imperative for those engaging in political economy across the social sciences.
Ben Fine, Ph.D. (1974), London School of Economics, is Emeritus Professor of Economics at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, and Visiting Professor at Wits School of Governance, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa. His most recent books include Material Cultures of Financialisation, co-edited with Kate Bayliss and Mary Robertson (Routledge, 2018); Race, Class and the Post-Apartheid Democratic State, co-edited with John Reynolds and Robert van Niekerk (University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2019); and A Guide to the Systems of Provision Approach: Who Gets What, How and Why, with Kate Bayliss (Palgrave, 2021). His Marxâs âCapitalâ (Pluto, 2016) is now in its sixth edition (with co-author Alfredo Saad Filho). He was founding Chair of the International Initiative for Promoting Political Economy (iippe.org) until June 2023.
Preface
1âIntroduction and Overview
â1âPicking up the Threads
â2âTwin Peaks
2âEconomics Imperialism: a History of a Revolution in Economics that Never Was (Acknowledged)
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Forward March of âEconomics Imperialismâ Halted
â3âThe (In)Visibility of Economics Imperialism
â4âBalance against the Unbalanced/Imbalanced?
â5âEconomics Imperialism Is as Variegated as Economics Imperialism Does
â6âStrategic Considerations by Way of Conclusion
3ââEconomic Imperialismâ: a View from the Periphery
âPostscript as Personal Pre-amble
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Historical Anomaly
â3âThe Anomaly of Scope
â4âThe Anomaly of Resistance
â5âThe Prospects for Radical Political Economy
4ââHousehold Appliances and the Use of Time: the United States and Britain since the 1920sâ â a Comment
âPostscript as Personal Pre-amble
â1âIntroduction
â2âA False Economy of Time?
â3âFrom Time to Demand
â4âThe Appliance of Economic Science?
â5âTowards a Durable Alternative
5âThe Economics of Identity and the Identity of Economics?
âPostscript as Personal Pre-amble
â1âIntroduction
â2âIdentity as Individual Choice
â3âIdentity as Social Choice
â4âIdentity and the Social
â5âThe Economics of Identity as Economics Imperialism
â6âConcluding Remarks
6âCollective Choice and Social Welfare: Economics Imperialism in Action and Inaction
âPostscript as Personal Pre-amble
â1âDisciplinary and Personal Beginnings
â2âBringing Back In, bbi, as Analytical Context
â3âEconomics and Social Choice: Marriage and Divorce
â4âInterpreting the History of Social Choice Theory in Reverse?
7âThe Road Ahead: from Freakonomics to Political Economy
âPostscript as Personal Pre-amble
â1âIntroduction
â2âEconomic Crisis and Economic Theory
â3âThe (General) Criticisms
â4âClearing the Ground
â5âMethodological Issues
â6âQuestions of the History of Economic Thought
â7âEconomics Imperialism and the Role of Finance
â8âThe Road Ahead
8âFreakonomics as Thickening End of the Symbolic Wedge
âPostscript as Personal Pre-amble
â1âResponse to Jack Vromen
9âVicissitudes of Economics Imperialism
âPostscript as Personal Pre-amble
â1âSpeakerâs Corner
10âEconomics and Interdisciplinarity: One Step Forward, N Steps Back?
âPostscript as Personal Pre-amble
â1âEconomics Is as Economics Does
â2âEconomics Imperialism
â3âAcknowledging the Strengths, Exposing and Exploiting the Weaknesses
Index
All interested in the history of economic thought, critique of mainstream economics and promotion of heterodox economics, and interdisciplinarity and the scale and scope of economics imperialism and its critique.