The right of peoples to self-determination seems well-settled and covered extensively in the scholarly record. Yet old Trotskyâs question â of whom is this right and to what? â haunts the self-determination literature. Somehow almost every work on it begins with an expression of puzzlement. This right turns out to be elusive, underdefined in its scope and content, paradoxical in almost every aspect. This book mobilises all powers of critical legal theory and modern philosophy to take the bull by its horns. Instead of ironing out the paradoxes, it aims to finally give them a proper explanation based on the concept of exception.
PrzemysÅaw Tacik, Dr. phil. (2014), Dr. iur (2016), Jagiellonian University in Kraków, is Assistant Professor at that university and Director of Nomos: Centre for International Research on Law, Culture and Power. He has published extensively on law and philosophy, including A New Philosophy of Modernity and Sovereignty. Towards Radical Historicisation (Bloomsbury 2021).
Acknowledgements
Introduction
iâIt Is What It Is Not: Introductory Critical Perspectives on the Right of Self-determination of Peoples
âi.1âWhat Can Critical Legal Theory Bring to the Study of Self-determination?
âi.1.1âPlaidoyer for Theory in International Law
âi.1.2âCritical Legal Thinking as a Paradigm for International Law
âi.1.3âCritical Legal Thinking and Self-Determination of Peoples
âi.2âCritique of Opening Gestures vis-à -vis Self-Determination
âi.2.1âThe Conceptual Vastness of Self-Determination
âi.2.2âHow Could an Internally Contradictory Right Be Effective?
âi.2.3âStrategies of Defining
âi.3âRight to Self-Determination of Nations as a State of Exception within International Law
âi.3.1âAgambenian State of Exception: Suspension at the Heart of the Law
âi.3.2âThe Right of Nations to Self-Determination as the State of Exception in International Law: Theoretical Outline
âi.3.3âThe Right of Nations to Self-Determination as the State of Exception in International Law: Beyond Agamben
âi.4âWar and Spiral: Two Symptomal Lectures
âi.4.1âWar and Self-Determination
âi.4.2âThe Spiral of Self-Determination
âi.5âThe Self-Determination Triangle: Nation, Sovereignty, International Law
âi.5.1âThe rsd as a Suture between the Domestic and the International
âi.5.2âThe Biopolitical Underside of National Self-determination
âi.5.3âIdeologies of Secession
âi.6âConclusions
iiâA Critical Genealogy of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination
âii.1âHistories of Self-Determination: against Continuity
âii.2âRevelation of a Conceptual Knot: from 18th to the First World War
âii.2.1âThe American and the French Revolutions: a Release of Self-Determination Force
âii.2.2âThe Simmering Pot: on the Way to Self-Determination
âii.2.3âThe Theory of Marxism and Self-Determination
âii.3âYes, but ⦠Self-Determination as a Trap and a Misunderstanding: 1914â1945
âii.3.1âThe Practice of Marxism and Self-Determination
âii.3.2âThe Wilsonian Version
âii.3.3âSelf-Determination in the Interwar
âii.4âThis Time Properly? Self-Determination in the Cold War
âii.4.1âThe UN Charter
âii.4.2âThe Golden Era of Self-Determination as Decolonisation
âii.4.3âThe Classic Corpus of icj Jurisprudence on Self-Determination
âii.4.4âParadoxes of Decolonisation
âii.5âLiberal Reconfiguration: 1989â2008
âii.5.1âSelf-Determination under Reconstruction
âii.5.2âThe Post-socialist Wave of Self-Determination
âii.5.3âTheory and Practice of Self-Determination in the Liberal Era
âii.6âConfusion of Post-liberal Times: Revelation of an Aporia
âii.6.1âThe Kosovo Case: Hiatus of Self-Determination Revealed
âii.6.2âThe Post-Kosovo Conondrum
âii.7âConclusions: Historical Incoherence of Self-Determination
iiiâSelf-Determination between Legal Fictions and Reality
âiii.1âThe Nation, the People, the Void
âiii.2âWhat Self Is Determining?
âiii.3âThe Gentle Art of Suturing: Nations, States and uti possidetis
âiii.4âThe Legal Status of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination
âiii.4.1âRight and/or Principle
âiii.4.2âContent and Status
ivâThe Right to Self-Determination as a State of Exception in International Law
âiv.1âThe Content of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination
âiv.1.1âExternal versus Internal Self-Determination: Tales of a False Symmetry
âiv.1.2âThe Pale Scare: Secession as a Form of Self-Determination
âiv.1.3âAn Ideal for Daylight: General Right to Secession
âiv.1.5âInconspicuously Constructed Normality: Internal Self-Determination and Its Corollaries
âiv.1.6âConclusions: Secession and the Non-applicability of the Right to Self-Determination
âiv.2âGovernance of the Exception: Enforceability of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination
âiv.2.1âParadoxes of rsdâs Enforceability
âiv.2.2âBefore âExercisingâ the rsd: Fight in the Extra-legal Zone
âiv.2.3âAfter âExercisingâ the rsd: Recognition as Governance
âiv.3âA Special Case of a Special Right: the rsd of Indigenous Peoples
âiv.3.1âThe Exceptional Position of Indigenous Peoples
âiv.3.2âSelf-Determination of Indigenous Peoples
vâParadoxes of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination: a Critical Reappraisal
âv.1âPopular Sovereignty v. State Sovereignty
âv.2âNationalism v. International Law
âv.3âSelf-Determination v. Territorial Integrity
âv.4âDomestic Law v. Secession
âv.5âSelf-Determination: Law v. Fact
âv.6âSelf-Determination v. The Right to Democratic Governance
âv.7âSelf-Determination v. Representative Government: the Meaning of Peopleâs Consent
âv.8âIndividual v. Collective Rights of Self-Determination
âv.9âCreatio Continua: Is Self-Determination Perpetual or One-Off?
Conclusions
Bibliography
Index
The book is addressed principally at academic libraries, scholars in international law, critical legal theory and political philosophy as well as practitioners of international law (judges, lawyers, diplomats, teachers).