Performing Arguments: Debate in Early English Poetry and Drama proposes a fresh performance-centered view of rhetoric by recovering, tracing, and analyzing the trope and tradition of aestheticized argumentation as a mode of performance across several early ludic genres: Middle English debate poetry, the fifteenth-century âdisguisingâ play, the Tudor Humanist debate interlude, and four Shakespearean works in which the dynamics of debate invite the playsâ reconsideration under the new rubric of ârhetorical problem plays.â Performing Arguments further establishes a distinction between instrumental argumentation, through which an arguer seeks to persuade an opponent or audience, and performative argumentation, through which the arguer provides an aesthetic display of verbal or intellectual skill with persuasion being of secondary concern, or of no concern at all. This study also examines rhetorical and performance theories and practices contemporary with the early texts and genres explored, and is further influenced by more recent critical perspectives on resonance and reception and theories of audience response and reconstruction.
Maura Giles-Watson (ALB-Classical Studies, Harvard; PhD-English, U of Nebraska) teaches early drama and performance studies at the University of San Diego. Her articles have appeared in Early Theatre, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, and essay collections. She directs the Tudor Plays Project, a digital humanities research program.
âThe volume's arguments are clear, well organized, and thoroughly documented and supported by a significant number of primary sources. Of particular value for those in the performing arts is the final chapter, which concerns formal rhetorical argumentation and declamation in Shakespeare's dramas, with a particular focus on the so-called problem plays. An insightful epilogue reframes the volume as an exploration of the encounter between rhetoric and theatre. Summing Up: *** Highly recommended. Graduate students through faculty; professionals.â â K. J. Wetmore Jr., Loyola Marymount University , in: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries 62/3 (2024), p. 246.
Acknowledgements
List of Figures
Introduction
1âToward a Performance-Centred Perspective on Rhetoric
â1âGuiding Principles
â2âRhetorical Aesthetics and Epistemics
â3âEthos and Ethopoeia
â4âLudic Agonistics
2âThe Argument Is the Action Rhetoric, Poetry, and Premodern Performance Culture
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Aesthetics of Disputatio
â3âVarieties of Rhetorico-Poetic Performance
â4ââWhen Is a Text a Play?â
3âRhetorical Theatre Middle English Debate Poetry in Performative Perspective
â1âIntroduction
â5âThe Performability of The Owl and the Nightingale
â6âRepresentation and Ethopoeia in Wynnere and Wastoure
â7âUnsettled Questions: Lydgateâs Disguising at Hertford
4âChamber Theatre Tudor Humanist Debate Interludes and the Participatory Audience
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Thomas More Circle and Rhetorico-Theatrical Aesthetics
â3ââAn Interlude!â
â4âChamber Theatre and the Activated Audience
â5âReconstructing Tudor Performance Spaces and Audience Experience
â6âThe Fourepp and Religious Satire
â7âThe Play of the Wether: Improvisation and Satire at Court
â8âA Play of Love and Mock Legal Argumentation
â9âConclusion
5ââWho Shall Be Most Right?â Ethos, Eloquence, and Argumentation in Shakespeareâs Rhetorical Problem Plays
â1âIntroduction
â2âShakespeareâs Rhetorical Culture
â3âFields of Argumentation in the Dramatic Frame
â4âDebate in the âRhetorical Problem Playsâ
â5âThe Moral Argument in Measure for Measure
â6âPseudo-legal Debate in The Merchant of Venice
â7âPolitical Debate and Sexual Politics in Troilus and Cressida
â8âThe âSweet Smoke of Rhetoricâ in Loveâs Labourâs Lost
â9âConclusion
Epilogue
Bibliography
Index
Research institutes; academic research libraries; specialist faculty and post-graduate researchers; theatre historians and practitioners; researchers in rhetoric and argumentation.