Debate within the Venetian Senate at turn of the fifteenth century has long been opaque, as only an elite few were allowed access to Senate proceedings, their participation bound to secrecy. This volume offers a new interpretation of scribal intent, enabling hidden aspects of those discussions to come to light.
By using documentation related to Veniceâs involvement in Albanian territories as a case study, this study unfolds the systematic yet secretive method by which scribes classified Senate discussions. The registers emerge as triumphs of precise and pragmatic codification within a milieu of information overflow.
Grabiela Rojas Molina, Ph.D. (2020), Central European University, is a researcher of intellectual history and late medieval Venice. She has also delivered lectures and published articles on the legal tradition of medieval Albanian cities.
â1.3âFrom Entry to âStoryâ
â1.3.1âSelection Criteria
2âDebate in Context
â2.1âElitism and Protagonism
â2.2âSea Riches
â2.3âPast and Present
3âOutline on Venice and the Mediterranean Protagonists
â3.1âPower Units alla veneziana
â3.2âCommunal Administration and Organisation of Albanian Cities
â3.3âAlbanian Protagonists
â3.4âMediterranean Protagonists
4âNewsworthiness
â4.1âUneven Impact: N-entries and Other Nouitates (1392â1394)
â4.2âAlternative Formulations of N-entries (1394â1395)
â4.3âThe Ottoman Victory: A Change of Perspective (1396â1397)
â4.4âAlbania Rebels (1398â1400)
â4.5âNews Heard and Expectation (1400â1401)
â4.6âLatest News: All Enemies Defeated (1402)
â4.7âConcluding Remarks
5ââWhat the Signoria Saysâ
â5.1âFirst Responses to Durrës, Shkodra and Lezhë (1392â1394)
â5.2âNew Threats: Many Responses (1395â1396)
â5.3âVeniceâs Silence and Its Consequence (1397â1400)
â5.4âVeniceâs Say in a Changing World (1401â1402)
â5.5âConcluding Remarks
Epilogue: Antonio Morosini, the Witness
Some Conclusions
Bibliography
Index
Scholars, non-academics and graduate students interested in Venetian history, the stato da mar, medieval and early modern Mediterranean studies, political communication, historical method and explanation, and intellectual history.