In an era of Covid 19, The Court of Justice of the European Union explores the extent to which the CJEU can realise a powerful role as guardian of the EUâs rule of law in a public health emergency. Drawing on an extensive literature review, The Court of Justice of the European Union argues the CJEU can realise such a role by anchoring a structured rule of law review in its reasoning when considering the exercise by the Member States of the public health derogation. Both the legal reasoning of the CJEU during the Covid 19 public health emergency and its aftermath, as well as the related challenges to the EUâs rule of law, are legally and politically of intense interest to legal academics, legal practitioners, policy makers and students.
Kate Farrant Shaw Ph.D. (2015), Brunel University, is a Rule of law and legal history academic. She was also a former Senior Law Lecturer at Leeds Beckett University and legal officer at H.M. Attorney Generalâs Chambers, Isle of Man.
1âIntroduction and Overview
â1âIntroduction
â2âIntroduction to the cjeu and Its Unique Method of Interpretation for Interpreting Framework Treaties
â3âThe cjeu and the Use of Proportionality as a Useful Tool When Reviewing Expulsion Measures for an EU Citizen on Imperative Grounds of Public Security in Tsakouridis
â3.1âIntroduction
â3.2âArticle 45(2) teu, Article 27 Directive 2004/38 and Expulsion of an EU Citizen on Imperative Grounds of Public Security
â3.3âThe cjeu and the Use of Proportionality When Reviewing the Expulsion of an EU Citizen on Imperative Grounds of Public Security in Tsakouridis
â4âChapter Overview
â5âConclusion
2âTheoretical Perspectives â The Symbolic Importance of the EUâs Rule of Law
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Rule of Law a Widely Acknowledged Legitimating Symbol of Importance
â3âThe EUâs Rule of Law as a Quintessential Treaty Value of Importance
â4âThe cjeu and Taking on the Role of Guardian of the EUâs Rule of Law Standards
â5âConclusion
3âA Clear and Present Danger? Time for a Structured Rule of Law Review by the cjeu in Respect of Preventative Expulsion or Entry of EU Citizens Deemed at Risk of Terrorism?
â1âIntroduction
â2âTheoretical Perspectives â A Preventative Approach to Combating Terrorism in EU Directive on Combatting Terrorism
â2.1âIntroduction
â2.2âA New Preventative Approach to Terrorism in EU Directive on Combating Terrorism
â2.3âCriticism in the Literature of the New Preventative Approach to Terrorism in the Directive on the Grounds It Challenges Legality and Hampers Effective Judicial Scrutiny
â3âThe cjeu and Refusal of Entry of a Suspected Terrorist Case C-300/11, zz
â4âTime for Structured Rule of Law Review by the cjeu in Respect of Rreventative Expulsion of EU Citizens Deemed at Risk of Terrorism?
â5âConclusion
4âThe cjeu and the Public Health Derogation in a Pandemic? â Time to Review the Operation of a Rarely Invoked Derogation?
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Public Health Derogation Pre the Pandemic â A Rarely Invoked Derogation
â3âKey Challenging Circumstances for the Member States in the Covid 19 Public Health Emergency
â3.1âIntroduction
â3.2âKey Challenges for the Member States in the Context of the Exercise of the Public Health Derogation in a Pandemic
â3.2.1âNational Emergency Restrictive Measures Which Are Brought in and Which May Breach Legality, a Key Tenet of the EU Rule of Law Standards
â3.2.2.âDiffering Approaches to Interpretation of Scientific Evidence throughout the Covid 19 Pandemic
â3.2.3âDiversity of Travel Restrictions
â3.2.4âProtection of Health Care Systems of the Member States
â3.2.5âInconsistency in the Application of Covid Restrictive Measures
â4âTime for the cjeu to Review the Operation of a Rarely Invoked Derogation?
â4.1âIntroduction
â4.2âThe cjeu and Reviewing the Exercise of the Public Health Derogation in an Era of Covid 19
â5âConclusion
5âThe cjeu and Anchoring a Meaningful Review of the Public Health Derogation in a Pandemic
â1âIntroduction
â2âAnchoring a Rule of Law Review of the Public Health Derogation
â3âThe cjeu and More Meaningful Engagement with a Structured Rule of Law Review
â4âConclusion
Conclusion
âAppendix 1âTable of Treaties, Instruments and Legislation (in Date Order)
âAppendix 2âTable of Cases (in Alphabetical Order)
Bibliography
Index
The intended audience for the book is for academics, academic libraries, undergraduate and postgraduate EU law students, as well as policy makers.