The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals: The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory? focuses on the largely unexplored role of the host state law in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals. Given domestic lawâs essential role in subject-matter jurisdiction issues, and in the light of the broader function of host state law and host state courts in contemporary investment treaty law, the author argues that the dormant âlocalisationâ theory that was raised and defended by developing countries in the 1960s-1970s in the context of foreign investment contract disputes has now been partially revived in the area of the investment treaty law. This is a significant milestone in the ongoing discussions on the reform of the investment treaty dispute settlement regime.
Reza Eftekhar, Ph.D. (2019), Leiden University, is a Legal Adviser at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. He has published translations and co-authored articles and book chapters on international arbitration and investment treaty arbitration.
Acknowledgments List of Abbreviations
Introduction
âIâThe Relevance of the Host State Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations: Revival of the Localisation Theory?
âIIâQuestions and Arguments
âIIIâStructure
âIVâEssential Concepts
ââAâApplicable Law
ââBâDomestic Law
âVâApproach and Sources
ââAâGeneral Approach
ââBâInterpretive Approach
ââCâSources
PART 1 The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdictionratione materiaeof An Investment Treaty Tribunal
1âThe Role of Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations in General
âIntroduction
âSection One: General Remarks with Regard to the Application of Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations
ââAâThe Reason for the Importance of Host State Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations
ââBâThe Guise in Which Domestic Law Applies in Investment Treaty Arbitrations: As Fact or as Law?
ââCâThe Legal Grounds of the Application of Domestic Law as Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations
âââAâThe Parties Have Expressly or Impliedly Chosen Domestic Law to Govern a Particular Issue
âââBâThe Nature of the Legal Issue
ââDâThe Irrelevance of the Applicable Law Provision in Investment Treaties and the ICSID Convention
âSection Two: The Situations in Which an Investment Treaty Tribunal Has to Refer to Domestic Laws
âAâThe Role of Domestic Law in Jurisdictional Issues
ââAâJurisdiction Ratione Materiae
âââIâThe Legality of Investment
âââIIâExistence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
âââIIIâApproval of Investments
ââBâRatione Personae
âBâThe Role of Domestic Law in Issues Concerning Merits
ââAâDomestic Law as Fact in Issues Concerning Merits
ââBâDomestic Law as Law in Issues Concerning Merits
âââIâExpress Treaty Reference to the Application of Domestic Law as Law
âââIIâContractual Claims
âSection Three: Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Methods and Means
ââAâAscertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Methods
ââBâAscertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Means
ââCâConclusion on the Methods and Means of Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law
âConclusion
âIntroduction to Chapters 2 & 3: The Role of Domestic Law in Determining the Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals
2âApplication of Domestic Law to the Legality Requirement
âSection One: The Legal Bases for Referring to the Laws of the Host State
ââAâAgreement by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty
âââAâExpress Agreement of the Treaty Contracting Parties
âââIâVarying Formulations and Its Impact
âââIIâVarying Locations and Its Impact
ââBâImplicit Reference
ââBâThe Nature of the Legal Issue
ââCâRelying on Principles of International Law for Dismissing Illegal Investments
âSection Two: The Actual Application of Domestic Law to Particular Questions Regarding the Legality Requirement
ââAâThe Scope of the Legality Requirement
âââAâThe Formal Scope of the Legality Requirement
âââBâThe Substantive Scope of the Legality Requirement
âââIâApproaches Adopted in Investment Treaty Arbitrations
âââIIâThe Proposed Solution Regarding the Substantive Scope of the Legality Requirement
âââCâTemporal Scope of the Legality Requirement
âââDâConclusions on the Scope of the Legality Requirement
ââBâThe Consequences of the Application of the Legality Requirement
âââAâGeneral and Specific Consequences of the Legality Requirement
âââIâGeneral Consequence of Illegality
âââIIâSpecific Consequence of Illegality
âââIIIâThe Missing Jurisdictional Condition
âââBâPossible Defences by Investors
âââIâObject and Purpose of the Underlying Investment Treaty
âââIIâThe Involvement of the Host State
âConclusion
3âApplication of Domestic Law to Questions Regarding the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
âIntroduction
âSection One: The Applicable Law to the Question of Determining the Meaning, Scope, and the Legal Bearings of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
ââAâAgreement by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty
âââIâExpress Choice by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty
âââIIâImplied Choice by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty
ââBâThe Nature of the Legal Issue
ââCâConclusion
âSection Two: The Actual Application of Domestic Law to Particular Questions Regarding the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
ââAâThe General Function of Host State Law in Determining the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
ââBâThe Specific Function of Host State Law in Determining the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
âââAâDefinition of Property
âââBâConditions for Transfer of Title
âââCâConditions for Protection of Contractual Rights
âConclusion
PART 2 The Revival of the Localisation Theory in Light of the Developments in Investment Treaty Law
4âThe Localisation Theory
âRoots, Premises, and Its Legal Destiny
âIntroduction
âSection One: Classic State-Centric Theories: The Calvo Doctrine and the Localisation Theory
âSection Two: The Emergence of Bilateral Investment Treaties
âConclusion
5âPartial Revival of the Localisation Theory in the Field of Investment Treaty Arbitration: The Current Role of Host State Law and Host State Court
âIntroduction
âSection One: The Current Role of Host State Law
ââAâA Distillation of Chapters 1â3 regarding the Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of An Investment Treaty Tribunal
ââBâDevelopments in Investment Treaty Law Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases
âââAâDevelopments in Investment Treaty Rulemaking Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases
ââââIâShift in the Approach towards the Role of the Host State Law in the Indian Model Investment Treaties
ââââIIâShift in the Approach towards the Role of the Host State Law in the Dutch Model Investment Treaties
âââAâDevelopments in Investment Treaty Jurisprudence Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases
âConclusion
âSection Two: The Current Role of Host State Courts
ââAâRecourse to Local Remedies for A Defined Period As A Precondition of Filing the Case before International Investment Arbitration
ââBâRecourse to Host State Court As A Prerequisite of the Establishment of the Violation of Investment Treaty Standards
ââCâRecourse to Host State Courtâs Determinations As A Point of Reference for Clarifying Preliminary Points of the Domestic Law
âââAâThe Interplay between Investment Treaty Tribunal and Host State Court in Substantive Matters
âââBâJurisprudence of International Courts and Tribunals with Regard to the Weight and Value of Host State Courtâs Determinations in International Proceedings
âââCâConcerns over the Legitimacy of Host State Courtâs Determinations
âââDâProposed Solutions to the Legitimacy Concerns
ââDâRecourse to Host State Court As An Investment Dispute Settlement Venue
ââAâHost State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes upon the Irreversible Choice by the Investor: Fork-in-the-Road Clauses
ââBâHost State Court as an Alternative Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes
ââCâHost State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes
ââDâHost State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of Certain Investment Disputes
âConclusion
Final Conclusion
Sources Index
This book concerns the field of investment treaty arbitration. As it significantly deals with academic matters in this field, it will be of interest to the academia (lecturers, commentators, and students (post-graduate)). On the other hand, as this book extensively discusses specific technical matters of law, practitioners, in particular, arbitrators, advocates, and national judges will be the potential readers of this work.