To what extent and to what purposes did John Chrysostom engage previous models of Biblical exegesis? In this systematic study of his Homilies on Genesis, new light is shed on the precision of his adaption of works by Basil, Origen, Eusebius of Emesa, and Eusebius of Caesarea, findings set against a wider âwebâ of parallels with various other exegetes (e.g. Ephrem, Diodore, Didymus). The cumulative picture is a network of shared knowledge across geographical and ecclesial boundaries which served as creative cache for Chrysostomâs discourses. With the metaphors of textual obscurity and word-depth, he prioritized name and word interpretations as a means of producing multiple layers of ethical evaluation.
Samuel Pomeroy, Ph.D (2019), University of Leuven, is an Alexander von Humboldt Post-Doctoral Researcher at WWU Münster, working in the Forschungsstelle Origenes.
Preface Acknowledgments Abbreviations Note on the Text of Chrysostomâs Homilies on Genesis in the Patrologia Graeca
Part 1 Integrating Tradition and Rhetoric
1 Introduction: Integrating Tradition and Rhetoric
â1âGoals, Techniques, and Tools in Ancient Literary Scholarship
â2âDevelopments in Patristic Exegetical Traditions
â3âQuestions-and-Answers and Genesis Exegesis
â4âChrysostomâs Homilies on Genesis and Patristic Exegetical Traditions
2 The Homilies on Genesis, Old Testament Interpretation, and the Rhetoric of Obscurity
â1âThe Homilies on Genesis in Recent Scholarship
â2âProvenance and Pedagogy of the Homilies on Genesis
â3âCommentary and Obscurity in Late Antiquity
â4âThe Rhetoric of Obscurity in Antiochene Works
â5âThe Rhetoric of Obscurity in the Homilies on Genesis
â6âCase Study: Homily 37 on Genesis
â7âConclusion
3 Questions and Answers in Tradition and Practice
â1âDisputing Exegetical Questions in Other Christian Homilies
â2âPosing Questions in the Homilies on Genesis
â3âVariant Question Formulas
â4âProviding Answers
â5âCase Study: Homily 29 on Genesis
â6âConclusion
4 Grammar and Linguistic Analysis in Rhetorical Context
â1âGlossing
â2âHabits of Scripture
â3âOnomastic Interpretation
â4âConclusion
Part 2 Engaging Exegetical Sources
5 John Chrysostom among the Antiochenes
â1âVariant Readings
â2âDescribing Natural Phenomena or Objects in the Bible
â3âNarrative Coherence
â4âDepartures from Eusebius and Diodore
â5âDisagreements with Eusebius or Diodore
â6âParallels to Ephrem
â7âConclusion
6 John Chrysostom and Basil of Caesarea
â1âLetter 260
â2âHomily 1 on Fasting
â3âHomilies on the Six Day Creation
â4âConclusion
7 John Chrysostom and Eusebius of Caesarea
â1âTypology
â2âTheophanies
â3âConclusion
8 John Chrysostom among the Alexandrians
â1âElucidations of Biblical Texts
â2âExegetical Discussion
â3âAnthropological and Philosophical Argumentation
â4âTypology
â5âTestimonia Collections
â6âConclusion
Conclusion
â1âAsking Exegetical Questions to Defamiliarize
â2âSelecting and Modifying Exegetical Traditions for âSymphoniaâ
â3âCreating Non-literal Readings from Traditions of Name-and Word-Depth Study
â4âAntiochene Debates about Non-literal Interpretations
Appendix 1: Occurrences of Îá½µÏημα and á¼ÏοÏία in the Homilies on Genesis Appendix 2: Sample Biblical Noun Glosses According to âHabitâ in Late Antique Christian Authors Manuscripts Mentioned Bibliography Index of Greek Words Index of Biblical Citations Index of Ancient Literature Index of Modern Authors Index of Subjects
The intended readership of this book is students and professors of ancient Biblical exegesis, particularly those interested in Alexandrian and Antiochene schools. Additionally, scholars of John Chrysostom seeking to gain a contextual perspective on his Biblical learning will benefit.